Case law

W. E. Brown, Inc. v. Pederson Construction & Tile Co.

20 Va. Cir. 280 · Charlottesville County Circuit Court · Jul 11, 1990

Mory Stores v. Skoog Const. Co., 38 Ill. … In Coakley & Williams, Inc. v.

Stickley v. Rockingham County Board of Supervisors

47 Va. Cir. 347 · Rockingham County Circuit Court · Nov 13, 1998

See, e.g, Ticonderoga Farms v. County of Loudoun, 242 Va. 170 (1991); Resource Conservation *351 Management, Inc. v. Board of Supvrs. of Prince William County, 238 Va. 15 (1989). … Chris Brown, Esquire, counsel for the Respondent, and to Bonnie L. Paul, Esquire, counsel for Petitioner.

Kolinski v. Board of Regents

13 Ct. Cl. 206 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Apr 25, 1980

The first was a motion filed by the claimants for sanctions, requesting the entry of an Order awarding claimants costs and attorney’s fees for the reason that the respondent, Charles V. … See Evans v. Dept. of Banking, 12 Ct.Cl. 168 (1978) and Metz v. W.Va. State Bd. of Probation and Parole, et al., 13 Ct.Cl. 292 (1979). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the respondent Campanizzi is sustained.

Roosevelt Nassau Operating Corp. v. Board of Assessors

68 Misc. 2d 183 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1970

Tax Comm., 19 A D 2d 56; Matter of United States of Amer. v. Tax Comm., 22 A D 2d 290; Killip Laundering Co. v. State of N. Y., 32 A D 2d 579; J. W. Mays, Inc., v. Tax Comm., 21 A D 2d 801, affd. 16 N Y 2d 529.) … (See, also, Woolworth Co. v. Comm. of Taxation and Assessment, 26 A D 2d 759; People ex rel. Gale v.

Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Armstrong School District Board of Directors

62 Pa. D. & C.2d 369 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Armstrong County · Jul 19, 1973

The courts have repeatedly stated that costs in equity should be taxed by analogy to common-law rules of liability for costs: Winton’s Appeal, 87 Pa. 77 ; Cadillac Real Estate Co. v. … . & C. 2d 199; Shapiro v. Shapiro, 424 Pa. 120 .

Kemp v. Monroe County Board of Elections

129 Misc. 2d 491 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 23, 1985

On all of the foregoing, the court grants the relief requested by each of the petitioners and directs the respondent Board of Elections to reinstate the designating petitions of said petitioners. … Cooper, the Board of Elections correctly invalidated the 10 signatures on page 4 of their petition because the subscribing witness did not show her post-office address, to wit: Fairport, New York.

Norton v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

27 Va. Cir. 318 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Apr 8, 1992

Although Virginia case law may require Norton to prove manifest error or a total disregard of controlling evidence by the Board, see Arlington County Board v. … Parris v. Appalachian Power Co., 2 Va. App. 219 (1986).

Cohn v. Board of Supervisors of Warren

34 Misc. 2d 928 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1962

Y. v. Leo, 174 N. Y. S. 451, 459; Gilmartin v. City of New York, 20 Misc 2d 235 ; Moore v. Town of Oyster Bay, 29 Misc 2d 169 .) … A county board may not even spend tax moneys to submit a proposition to the electorate if the board has the sole authority to act (Matter of McCabe v. Voorhis, supra).

Maldonado v. New York State Board of Parole

102 Misc. 2d 880 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1979

Wright, 568 F2d 142; Turner v American Bar Assn., 407 F Supp 451 ; United States v Hinderman, 528 F2d 100). … For the foregoing reasons, the motion is denied. *882 The court further recommends that the Board of Parole and the superintendents of the State correctional institutions inform each inmate law clerk under their jurisdiction

People ex rel. Drake v. Sutton

34 N.Y.S. 487 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1895

BROWN, P. J. The relators are all veteran volunteer firemen of the city of Brooklyn, and prior to January 31, 1895, were clerks in the board of audit of that city, and on that day were discharged. … The case of People v. Groetting, 133 N. Y. 569 , 30 N.

Chem Construction Corp. v. Board of Education

105 Misc. 2d 980 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1980

Co. v Board of Educ., 229 NYS2d 337 , 339). … Co. v Board of Educ., 229 NYS2d 337 , 339, supra).

Booher v. Botetourt County Board of Supervisors

65 Va. Cir. 53 · Botetourt County Circuit Court · Apr 29, 2004

However, all of the cases cited by the Board, including Helmick v. … Cupp v. Board of Supervisors, 227 Va. 580, 589 , 318 S.E.2d 407, 411 (1984). See, e.g., Virginia Beach Beautification Comm’n v.

Board of Education of Terrace Park v. Board of Education of Indian Hill Local School District

60 Ohio Law. Abs. 29 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Apr 13, 1951

Hamilton County Board of Education is the duly constituted Board of Education of said county; and Defendant Board of Education of Indian Hill Local School District is the duly constituted Board of Education of said local … This court is of the opinion that a negative answer to this question is found in the case of Wachendorf v. Shaver, 149 Oh St 231, 36 O.

Board of Education v. Board of Assessment Review of the Fenner

193 Misc. 2d 272 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2002

(Matter of Dudley v Kerwick, 52 NY2d 542 [1981].) … Fund Corp. v Buckley, 74 Misc 2d 1078 [Sup Ct, Rensselaer County 1973]; Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 131 Misc 2d 817 [Sup Ct, Monroe County 1986].)

Stacy v. Board of Governors

48 Ill. Ct. Cl. 269 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Sep 15, 1995

(Weber v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners (1990), 204 Ill. App. 3d 358 ; Stearns v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners (1978), 59 Ill. App. 3d 569 .) … (Piper v. Board of Trustees (1981), 99 Ill. App. 3d 752 .)

Flinn v. Fairfax County School Board

87 Va. Cir. 262 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Nov 14, 2013

The statute does not place a burden on the Plaintiff, rather, the burden is on the school board and the school board alone. … Carnes, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors, 252 Va. 377, 383 , 478 S.E.2d 295 (1996)).

Levy v. Nassau County Board of Elections

162 Misc. 2d 861 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1994

(Mackey v Nassau County Democratic Comm., 147 AD2d 688, 689 .) … (Matter of Thompson v Wallace, 45 NY2d 803 .) There was no reason petitioner, in this case, should have let the 10-day period lapse even though the Board of Elections had not rendered its decision.

Lewitus v. Seccomb

136 Misc. 305 · City of New York Municipal Court · Mar 25, 1930

Litigation over costs has been unduly frequent since the famous case of Jarndyce v. Jarndyce, reported in the last century by Charles Dickens. … But the rules applicable to the case before me now are clearly laid down by at least three authorities: First National Bank v. Fourth National Bank ( 84 N. Y. 469 ); Merkel v. Lazard ( 139 App. Div. 624 ), and Jones v.

Brown & Ketcham Iron Co. v. L. P. Hazen & Co.

20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 490 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jan 4, 1908

Upon the authority of Ward v. Ward, 10 Circ. Dec. 656 ( 20 R. 136 ), we are of the opinion that the affidavit for attachment filed herein was void. … See Saxton v. Plymire, 2 Circ. Dec. 118 ( 3 R. 209 ). The court therefore erred in overruling the motion of plaintiff in error to discharge the attachment, and said judgment is reversed. Swing and Oiffln, JJ., concur.

Dawson v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors

59 Va. Cir. 517 · Virginia Circuit Court · Oct 22, 2001

In Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County v. … Gregory v. Board of Supervisors, 257 Va. 530, 537 (1999).