Case law

Janney v. Rappahannock Area Community Services Board

14 Va. Cir. 249 · Fredericksburg County Circuit Court · Dec 28, 1988

The defendant, Rappahannock Community Services Board, apparently is sponsoring the home. The defendant, Rappahannock Community Services, Inc. … (RCS), a subsidiary of the Board, owns or is in the process of acquiring the property. Defendants Phillips and Sanford own or once owned the property.

Brown v. Mayor of New York

16 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 587 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1877

Brown, as parties plaintiff in the action in place of Seaver the special administrator. … (Rooney v. Second Av. R. R. Co., 18 N. Y., 368 ; McGregor v. Comstock, 28 id., 237; Clark v. Rowling, 3 id., 217; Richardson v. R. R. Co., 7 Hun, 69 .)

Professional Equities Corp. v. Board of Assessment Review

75 Misc. 2d 403 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1973

This protest was returned by the Review Board for the reason that all adjourned hearings had been completed. The last public hearing before said board was held on July 25, 1973. … grievance day (700 Shore Road Assoc. v.

Brown v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburgh Railroad

52 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 439 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1887

Tbis point was marked and inferentially decided in Hewitt v. Prince ( 21 Wend., 79 ), a case considered under tbe provision of tbe Revised Statutes, as was also Edington v. Etna Life Insurance Company ( 77 N. Y., 564 ). … (Pierson v. The People, 79 N. Y., 424, 432, 433, 434 .) There is .nothing to the contary in Grattan v. Mutual Life Insurance Company (80 N. Y , 281), and in Renihan v.

Nesbitt v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

121 Misc. 2d 336 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1983

s insisted that its tenants, including petitioners, enter into new leases at rents higher than those permitted by rent stabilization, petitioners filed separate complaints with the New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board … Bank v Brower, 42 NY2d 471,474 ; see Gair v Peck, 6 NY2d 97 )” (Matter of Male Infant B., 96 AD2d 1055 ). However, where, as here, statutory authority exists for the granting of fees, such fees should be awarded.

Foti v. Board of Trustees

17 Va. Cir. 60 · Arlington County Circuit Court · Jan 10, 1989

Virginia Beach Beautification Commission v. Board of Zoning, 231 Va. 415, 417 (1986). The Retirement Board is not a board of the state government. … Taylor v. County Board, 189 Va. 472, 483 (1949). Due weight must be given by the trial court to the administrative proceedings. School Board of Campbell County v.

Boston v. Montville Township Zoning Board of Appeals

32 Ohio Misc. 118 · Medina County Court of Common Pleas · Sep 18, 1972

zoning certificate with the defendant Zoning Board of Appeals. … It will be nullified by a court only where the decision constitutes an abuse of the board’s discretion.” (See, also, Deibel v. Wilson, 77 Ohio Law Abs. 471 and Kanter v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 14 O. O. 2d 243.)

Brown v. Mayor of New York

18 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 21 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1877

(Rooney v. Second Av. R. R. Co., 18 N. Y., 368 ; McGregor v. Comstock, 28 id., 231; 3 id., 211; Richardson v. R. R. Co., 7 Hun, 69 ; opinion of Davis, P. J., in Brown v. The Mayor, 9 Hun, 581 .) … (Rooney v. Second Av. R. R., 18 N. Y., 368 ; Sherwood v. Buffalo and W. Y. R. R. Co., 12 How., 136 ; Haight v. Holcomb, 16 id., 173 ; Pinder v. Morris, 3 Caines, 165 ; Bradt v. Koon, 4 Cow., 416 ; Howland v.

Anderson v. Fairfax County Board

47 Va. Cir. 273 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Oct 27, 1998

It is from this ruling that the Board files its Motion for Reconsideration. … In support of this position, the Board relies upon the case of Board of Supervisors v. King Land Corp., 238 Va. 97 (1989). The Court finds that reliance to be misplaced.

Neustadter v. Zoning Appeals Board

38 Va. Cir. 185 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Oct 16, 1995

The decision of the Board is presumed to be correct, and the burden is upon the appellants to overcome the presumption. Board of Zoning Appeals v. Bond, 225 Va. 177, 179 (1983). … The Board’s decision will not be disturbed unless it applied erroneous principles of law or its decision was plainly wrong and violated the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance. Packer v.

Tullidge v. Zoning Appeals Board

29 Va. Cir. 385 · Augusta County Circuit Court · Dec 16, 1992

Cupp v. Board of Supervisors, 227 Va. 580, 594 , 318 S.E.2d 407 (1984); Hylton Enterprises, Inc. v. Prince William Co., 220 Va. 435, 440 , 258 S.E.2d 577, 581 (1979). … Board of Supervisors of Loudoun County v. Pumphrey, 221 Va. 205 , 269 S.E.2d 361 (1980).

People ex rel. Carleton v. Board of Assessors

52 How. Pr. 140 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1876

It was not necessary to entitle the applicant to a hearing that it should be conclusively shown in the first instance that an award must be made in his favor by the board of assessors. … If he should, the board has complete authority so to decide. Its duty is to hear the case as it may be presented.

Board of Control v. Wilson

82 Pa. D. & C.4th 545 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Oct 9, 2006

and the elected board. … the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Georges Township School Directors, 286 Pa. 129 , 133 A. 223 (1926), and more recently affirmed and explained in detail by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in South Newton Township Electors v.

Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. State

171 Misc. 2d 585 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1996

Board of Coop. Educ. Servs. v New York State Teachers’ Retirement Sys. (BOCES) was brought in Albany County, and assigned to this court from the outset. … There is a motion pending before this court seeking to consolidate BOCES with Matter of Bernstein v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs. (Bernstein) and Board of Educ. of *588 Haverstraw-Stony Point Cent.

Morello v. Ellwood City Borough Zoning Board

61 Pa. D. & C.2d 38 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County · Mar 12, 1973

J., — On October 4, 1972, the Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Ellwood City granted a variance to defendants, Brown-stein and Lane, to use the premises located at 300 Fountain Avenue, Ellwood City, Lawrence County, … Lessees of neighboring property have been granted standing to protest the zoning permit or application: Richman v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 391 Pa. 254 , 137 A.2d 280 (1958) and Nicholson v.

Thacker v. Zoning Appeals Board

41 Va. Cir. 136 · Virginia Beach County Circuit Court · Nov 5, 1996

The presumption on an appeal from the Board of Zoning Appeals, once certiorari has been granted, is with the BZA. … Town of Ashland v. Ashland Investment Co., 235 Va. 150, 155 (1988); see also Donovan v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 251 Va. 271, 274 (1996).

Smith v. Board of Stadium & Memorial Auditorium

197 Misc. 529 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1948

(Matter of Mercer v. Dowd, 288 N. Y. 381 ; Matter of Rohr v. Kenngott, 288 N. Y. 97 ; Matter of Mylod v. Graves, 274 N. Y. 381 .) … (Matter of Byrnes v. Windels, supra, p. 406 . See, also, Matter of Mercer v. Dowd, supra, p. 385 .)

Emerson v. Zoning Appeals Board

44 Va. Cir. 436 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Feb 13, 1998

Knowlton v. Browning-Ferris Industries, 220 Va. 571 (1979). Accordingly, once the Zoning Administrator showed that Mr. … In Dick Kelly Ent. v.

Cress v. Board of Regents

15 Ct. Cl. 216 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1984

Those letters (Claimant’s Exhibits 8 and 9) were written by and between the President of West Virginia Northern Community College and the Chancellor of the West Virginia Board of Regents. … Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 217 S.E.2d 919 (W.Va. 1975).

Clark v. Board of Supervisors

24 Va. Cir. 1 · Albemarle County Circuit Court · Apr 9, 1990

From the pleadings and evidence adduced, it is clear that the plaintiffs, unlike those in Johnson v. … The Court finds the case of McMinn v. Anderson, 189 Va. 289 (1949), applicable.