Case law

Board of Commisioners of Excise v. Doherty

16 How. Pr. 46 · New York County Courts · Dec 15, 1857

It is objected by the defendant’s counsel, that the action should have been brought in the name of the individuals who compose the board of commissioners of excise, and not in the name of the board. … Ormsby, on being examined by the defendant’s counsel, said “ he was not aware that the board had formally met on the subject.”

Mercado v. New York City Youth Board

21 Misc. 2d 228 · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 1959

Since petitioner did not qualify for employment on the basis of merit and fitness pursuant to a competitive test, he acquired no legal right to the position and is subject to removal at will (Matter of Scahill v. … Y. 560 ; Matter of Hilsenrad v. Miller, 284 N. Y. 445 ). The motion is denied and the petition dismissed.

Sanitary Water Board v. Harmar Coal Co.

50 Pa. D. & C.2d 627 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Aug 20, 1970

See Marmer v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 190 Pa. Superior Ct. 436 (1959). … The board’s evidence contra was most speculative. The recent case of Sanitary Water Board v.

Ludders v. Board of Supervisors

83 Pa. D. & C.4th 137 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County · Mar 1, 2007

See also, Cossell v. Connellsville Township Board of Supervisors, 779 A.2d 611 (Pa. … See generally, Atticks v. Lancaster Township Zoning Hearing Board, 915 A.2d 713 , 2006 WL 3913368 (Pa. Commw. 2007).

Thwaites v. New York State Board of Parole

34 Misc. 3d 694 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 21, 2011

(Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470 [2000]; Matter of King v New York State Div. of Parole, 190 AD2d 423 [1st Dept 1993], affd 83 NY2d 788 [1994]; Matter of Duffy v New York State Div. of Parole, 74 AD3d 965 [2010]; Matter … In Matter of King v New York State Div. of Parole ( 190 AD2d at 432 ), the court, in finding the Parole Board’s determination fundamentally flawed, stated, “The role of the Parole Board is not to resentence petitioner according

Town of Greenburgh v. Board of Supervisors

51 Misc. 2d 168 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1966

(See Town of Greenburgh v. Board of Supervisors, 49 Misc 2d 116,119 .) … Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.

People ex rel. Ayres v. Board of Supervisors

14 Barb. 52 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1852

In the Com *55 mercial Bank of Albany v. … (People v. Van Wyck, (4 Cowen, 260.)

Dixon v. Zoning Appeals Board

50 Va. Cir. 424 · Virginia Beach County Circuit Court · Nov 19, 1999

Packer v. Hornsby, 221 Va 117 (1980), quoting Tidewater Utilities v. Norfolk, 208 Va. 705, 711 (1968). … Segaloff v. City of Newport News, 209 Va. 259 (1968). Such a mistake does not give rise to a hardship as recognized in § 15.1-2309.

Hill v. Board of Water & Sewer Commissioners

28 N.Y.S. 805 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1894

Benton v. Hatch, 122 N. Y. 322 , 25 N. E. 486 ; Gilman v. Gilman, 111 N. Y. 265 , 18 N. E. 849 . In Wheeler v. Lawson, 103-R Y. 40, 8 FT. … A like view was taken in Griffin v. Railroad Co., 101 N. Y. 354 , 4 N. E. 740 ; People v. Hagadorn, 104 N. Y. 519 , 520, 10 N. E. 891 .

Town Board of Fallsburgh v. National Surety Corp.

53 Misc. 2d 23 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1967

Viemeister, 25 A D 2d 815; Greenwald v. Howard Stores Corp., 24 A D 2d 626; Herzog v. Herzog, 43 Misc 2d 1062 ; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. … Homer v. Homer, 282 App. Div. 699,700 ; Huffy v. Huffy, 241 App. Div. 682 ).

People ex rel. Olmsted v. Board of Supervisors

12 Barb. 446 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1852

And the same court, in the case of The People v. … The rule was so laid down by Judge Bronson, in The People v.

Brown v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

29 Fla. Supp. 2d 57 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Jul 11, 1988

The Browns purchased uninsured motorist coverage from State Farm. Thereafter, Mr. Brown sustained injuries in an automobile collision involving Juan Molina, an under insured motorist. … Keen v. Detroit Diesel Allison, 569 F.2d 547, 554 (10th Cir. 1978).

Decker v. Furniss

3 Duer 291 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 6, 1854

Full performance of the covenant on the part of Brown was made; the vessel left her wharf completed on the last of January, 1850, and she was registered in the names of Brown and Furniss, as joint owners, on Furniss’ affidavit … This is not a controversy between Brown and Furniss, but is one between them and third persons.

Barney v. Board of Rapid Transit Railroad Commissioners

38 Misc. 549 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1902

follow a line distant only seven feet from the building or house line of the street, it being claimed that in the plan of construction adopted there is a substantial departure from the maps and descriptions prepared by the board … In the case of Rogers v. O’Brien, 153 N.

Campbell County Board of Supervisors v. Royal

75 Va. Cir. 460 · Campbell County Circuit Court · Jun 26, 2007

Schwartz v. North Salem Board of Education

65 Misc. 2d 472 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1971

In article XII of the same contract, “Powers of Board”, the board’s powers were not to be abridged, etc., by the arbitration procedure. … (Matter of Lehman v. Ostrovsky, 264 N. Y. 130 .) “No one is under a duty to arbitrate unless by clear language he has agreed to do so ’ ’ (Matter of Eagar Constr. Corp. [Ward Foundation Corp.], 255 App.

People ex rel. Thomson v. Board of Supervisors

35 Barb. 408 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1861

In Warren v. … (Ayrault v. Sackett, 17 id. 508.) In Supervisors of Onondaga v.

Wilson v. Bedford County Board

66 Va. Cir. 427 · Bedford County Circuit Court · Jul 30, 1998

The Court in Freeman v. … Id. at 59 (citing Board of Public Works v. Gannt, 76 Va. 455, 461 (1882)). This echos the opinion of the Court in Mann v.

People ex rel. Board of Education v. Bennett

54 Barb. 480 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1867

of the 17th section of the same act, directed and empowered, and it is also therein expressed to be their duty, to raise and collect, *482 by tax, in the same manner as other taxes are collected, such sums as the said “.board … It may be proper to state, that it appears from the papers before me, that “ the board of trustees of said village” consists of six members, three of whom voted to raise the required sum, and the three defendants named in

Brown v. Supreme Court of the Independent Order of Foresters

34 Misc. 556 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1901

The Court of Appeals, in Rohrbach v. Germania Fire Ins. Co., 62 N. Y. 47 , and in Alexander v. … See Murphy v. Sons of Jacob, 77 Miss. 830 ; Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur v. Hall, 24 Ind. App. 316 ; Knights of Pythias v. Withers, 59 U. S. App. 177; 177 U. S. 260 . Mr.