Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.69s

  • Brown v. Wahlig

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 29, 2017

    Plaintiffs, ) V. ) ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S ) MOTION FOR INVOLUNTARY JOHN B. … as a result of the alleged injuries suffered by Plaintiff Jeffery Brown.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • City of Morgantown v. Board of Governors

    8 Ct. Cl. 41 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1969

    In Hukle v. City of Huntington, 134 W.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Claim of Short v. Board of Education

    12 Misc. 2d 440 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1956

    In Matter of Mathusa v. Board of Educ. ( 202 Misc. 1010 ), the court, following Matter of Hogan v. City of Cohoes ( 279 App. … In Matter of Hogan v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rodger v. American Kennel Club, Inc.

    138 Misc. 310 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1930

    Brown were read and on motion same were referred to the New York Trial Board for investigation and report.” … Brown purchased it. (Dent v. North American S. Co., 49 N. Y. 390 .) It is, therefore, clear that Mrs.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Edelman v. Town Board of Oyster Bay

    14 Misc. 2d 953 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1958

    Apparently, considerations of traffic burdens and hazards are for the police and not zoning boards (Matter of Plander v. Koehler, 150 N. Y. S. 2d 879; Matter of Brooklyn Parking Corp. v. … Gannella, 193 Misc. 811 ; Matter of Property Owners Assn. v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 2 Misc 2d 309 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Scruby v. Zoning Appeals Board

    65 Va. Cir. 89 · Albemarle County Circuit Court · Jun 1, 2004

    Board of Zoning Appeals of Albemarle County? (2) If so, is the Zoning Administrator’s policy consistent with Stigallt Discussion of Authority County of Chesterfield v. … After Sanford v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Albemarle County in 1990, the policy was to treat an eminent domain taking as legally separating a parcel into two if the separation occurred before December 10, 1980.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • La Vecchia v. Board of Standards & Appeals

    26 Misc. 2d 39 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1960

    (Matter of New York Ambassador v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, 281 App. Div. 342 , affd. 305 N. Y. 791, 793 .) … Board of Stds. & Appeals, supra).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Department of Highways

    13 Ct. Cl. 60 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Nov 19, 1979

    RULEY, JUDGE: This claim was originally filed by Andrew Jackson Junior High School, but during the testimony it was developed that the damaged vehicle, a 1974 Dodge van, was in fact owned by The Board of Education of the … Shortly thereafter, the brown van turned to the left for reasons unknown at that time to Nelson.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cornelius v. Monroe County Board of Elections

    91 Misc. 2d 528 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1977

    Voorhis, 252 N.Y. 14, 18 ; Matter of Crane v. Voorhis, 257 N.Y. 298 ).” … (Matter of Cherry v Hayduk, 49 AD2d 934 ; Matter of Smith v McNab, 35 AD2d 744 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cale-Rome, Inc. v. Board of Assessors

    44 Misc. 2d 675 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1964

    City of Watertown v. Gilmore, 166 Misc. 323 ; Matter of Bender v. Easson, 216 N. Y. S. 2d 393; Real Property Tax Law, § 1612). … Our decision bears in mind that in a sense the clerk of the board is an agent of convenience (People ex rel. City of Watertown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Burgess v. Code Enforcement Board

    13 Fla. Supp. 2d 96 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Apr 23, 1985

    The nature of this appeal is the Order of the Lake County Code Enforcement Board, hereinafter called “Board”, requiring the Appellant, Ruth N. … Florida Companies v. Orange County, 411 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Dade County v. Gayer, 388 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1980); United States Casualty Company v. Maryland Casualty Company, 55 So.2d 741 (Fla. 1951).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vella v. City Zoning Board of Appeals

    206 Misc. 941 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1954

    V-7405 submitted and on file ”, and the board added in its resolution “ that in taking this action the Board of Appeals recommends: 1. … The board of appeals acted lawfully in granting said permits. (Matter of Reed v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, supra, pp. 134-135; Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, 278 App.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mico Business Products, Inc. v. Brown

    146 Misc. 2d 650 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1990

    More importantly, the Third Department’s decision in Rex Paving Corp. v White ( 139 AD2d 176, 181-182 ) confers standing upon the petitioner under the circumstances of this case. … Finally, in Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese v New York State Dept. of Health ( 66 NY2d 948 ), the Court of Appeals gave direction to the lower courts as to how standing objections should be handled.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tarnell v. Zoning Appeals Board

    63 Va. Cir. 588 · Fauquier County Circuit Court · Feb 6, 2004

    The Petitioner cites the recent case of Forrester v. Hall, 265 Va. 293 (2003), in support for their position of once a mobile home always a mobile home. … See Vepco v. Prince William Co., 226 Va. 382, 388 (1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sanitary Water Board v. Harmar Coal Co.

    50 Pa. D. & C.2d 627 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Aug 20, 1970

    See Marmer v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 190 Pa. Superior Ct. 436 (1959). … The board’s evidence contra was most speculative. The recent case of Sanitary Water Board v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Thwaites v. New York State Board of Parole

    34 Misc. 3d 694 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 21, 2011

    (Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470 [2000]; Matter of King v New York State Div. of Parole, 190 AD2d 423 [1st Dept 1993], affd 83 NY2d 788 [1994]; Matter of Duffy v New York State Div. of Parole, 74 AD3d 965 [2010]; Matter … In Matter of King v New York State Div. of Parole ( 190 AD2d at 432 ), the court, in finding the Parole Board’s determination fundamentally flawed, stated, “The role of the Parole Board is not to resentence petitioner according

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Flatbush Real Estate Board, Inc. v. Weaver

    5 Misc. 2d 75 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1957

    Petitioners, Flatbush Beal Estate Board, Inc., and Bushwick Beal Estate Board, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “ Flatbush Board ” and “ Bushwick Board ”, challenge, in this article 78 proceeding, the validity of Amendment … Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, October, 1948, Docket No. 21100; Woods v. Claving Realty Corp., et al., U. S. Court, of Appeals, Second Circuit, October 1948, Docket No. 21150.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Monroe Community Hospital v. Ingraham

    80 Misc. 2d 950 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1975

    Matter of Sigety v Ingraham, 29 NY2d 110, 115 .) … (See Sigety v Ingraham, 29 NY2d 110 , supra.) The motion to dismiss is denied and the respondents are directed to file an answer.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Buckley v. Zoning Appeals Board

    59 Va. Cir. 150 · Virginia Circuit Court · Jun 4, 2002

    Masterson v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Virginia Beach, 233 Va. 37 (1987). The Court will accord the decision of the Board with the required presumption of correctness. … Montello Salt Co. v. Utah, 221 U.S. 452 (1911).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Ayres v. Board of Supervisors

    14 Barb. 52 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1852

    In the Com *55 mercial Bank of Albany v. … (People v. Van Wyck, (4 Cowen, 260.)

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.