Case law

Brown v. Buckingham

11 Abb. Pr. 387 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1860

Brown v. Wing

170 Misc. 2d 554 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1996

(See, Matter of Jones v Berman, 37 NY2d 42, 57 .) … Y. v Soto-Lopez, supra, 476 US, at 903, 904 ).

Parker v. Brown

15 N.H. 176 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Jul 15, 1844

Rose v. Brown

186 Misc. 553 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1945

Co. v. … Brown. If the plaintiff had been required to reach Brown in New York City, his rights would have been lost. Under these circumstances it is held that defendant Brown is before the court in these proceedings.

Brown v. Guichard

37 Misc. 78 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1902

Grant v. Bank, 97 N. Y. 80 ; Stucky v. Bank, 108 id. 74; Barbour v. Priest, 103 id. 293; Bank v. Cook, 95 id. 343.

State v. Brown

167 Ohio Misc. 2d 45 · Athens County Municipal Court · Dec 12, 2011

. {¶ 1} This matter came on for consideration of the memoranda of the parties regarding the issue of restitution ordered at defendant’s, Patrick Brown’s, November 8, 2011 plea hearing. … State v. Johnson 164 Ohio App.3d 792 , 2005-Ohio-6826 , 844 N.E.2d 372 (2d Dist.), disallowed a restitution order to the Ohio Highway Patrol for its investigation costs. State v.

Gillis v. Brown

5 Cow. 388 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1826

People v. Brown

31 Misc. 3d 794 · Rochester City Court · Mar 31, 2011

That the defendant knew or had reason to know that his license was suspended or revoked is a necessary element of the offense (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [1] [a]; People v Pacer, 6 NY3d 504 [2006]; People v Mayes, 19 Misc … 3d 48 [2008]; People v Gabriel, 164 Misc 2d 473 [1995]).

Jackson v. Brown

26 N.Y.S. 156 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1893

Cheever v. Brown

7 N.Y.S. 918 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1889

The appeal papers in the case of Abbott v. Thomas 1 have been submitted to me upon this motion. They contain an opinion rendered by Mr. Justice Bartlett upon an application similar to the present one.

Brown v. Werblin

138 Misc. 29 · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 1930

(Gilbert Paper Co. v. Prankard, 204 App. Div. 83 ; Schantz v. Oakman, 163 N. Y. 148 .) … (Dykman v. Keeney, 154 N. Y. 483 ; Marsh v. Kaye, supra.)

Smith v. Brown

1 Duer 665 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 3, 1853

Smith v. Brown

3 How. Pr. 9 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1846

Hopper v. Brown

34 Misc. 661 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1901

Fowler v. Bowery Sav. Bank, 113 N. Y. 455 ; Goodwin v. Griffis, 88 id. 629. The six-year limitation *662 (Code, § 382), therefore, controls. On August 1, 1894, the unauthorized payment was made. … Such an action, therefore, would not be barred by the statute until February 1, 1902 (Hall v. Brennan, 140 N. Y. 409 ; Riley v. Riley, 141 id. 409 ; Adams v. Fassett, 149 id. 61), and suit was brought January 5, 1901.

Brown v. Walter

145 N.Y.S. 859 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1913

Brown & Sons Dumber Company of Louisville, Ky., or their authorized representative, nine hundred and fifty dollars ($950.00), to be paid out of my contract with Mr. William C. … Brown & Sons Lumber Co., or their representative, seven hundred dollars ($700.00) on or about July 10th, balance two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00), to be paid by August 1st, or sooner if possible.

Commonwealth v. Brown

1 Foster 345 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County · Oct 27, 1873

Brown v. Rosenberger

40 Pa. D. & C.4th 432 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 6, 1998

Philadelphia v. PRT Co., 337 Pa. 1 , 10 A.2d 434 (1940); Topelski v. Universal South Side Autos Inc., 407 Pa. 339 , 180 A.2d 414 (1962). … (See attached: exhibit “A.”) *441 EXHIBIT “A” In The Court Of Common Pleas Of Philadelphia County Trial Division August Term 1997, No. 3538 Elise Brown v. Craig A. Rosenberger And Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co.

Brown v. Finkelstein

193 Misc. 311 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1948

Wormser v. Brown

25 N.Y.S. 553 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1893

In November, 1892, the defendant trustees, upon notice to the plaintiffs, made an application to the said park board to rescind the resolution of said board revoking said permit; and the said board, after having heard both … defendants that no-relief could be granted to the plaintiffs because the windows had been finished, even if this action had been commenced as soon as-their construction had been begun, citing decision in case of Fire Department v.

Quereau v. Brown

17 N.Y.S. 644 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1892

Code Civil Proc. § 1021; Liegeois v. McCrackan; 22 Hun, 69 ; Rum. Pr. 236, 237; Gray v. Rothschild, 13 Civil Proc. R. 359 . … Gray v. Rothschild, *645 supra; Bank v. Bussell, 14 Abb. N. C. 99 ; Bank v. Lynch, 76 N. Y. 514 . The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion should be denied, with $10 costs.