Opinion

Gillis v. Brown

  • 5 Cow. 388
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 15, 1826
Status
Published
Author
Curiawoodworth
On the bench
Curia, Woodworth
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 66.6%

The opinion

Curia, per Woodworth, J.

The husband of the demandant had not an estate, that could descend to his heirs. It was pur auter vie. By the English statute, (29 Car. 2, c. 3, sec. 12,) such an estate descends to the heir, if it comes to him as a special occupant. It was enacted to prevent the mischief, which previously existed, that where no special occupant was designated by the grant, it belonged to the person who first took possession. (4 D. & E. 229.) This act enables the proprietor to devise the estate; but when no devise is made, it is chargeable in the hands of the heir, if it comes to him by reason of a special occupancy as assets by descent, as in case of lands in fee simple; and if there be no special occupant, it shall go to the executor and be assets. Our act, (1 R. L. 365, s. 4,) declares that estates of this description shall be deviseable; and if no devise be made, they shall go to the executor or administrator, *390 to be applied and distributed as- part of the personal estate. The consequence is, the demandant is not entitléd to dow er; and the tenant is entitled to judgment.

Judgment for the tenant.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.