Case law

Brown v. Monroe County Tax Claim Bureau

13 Pa. D. & C.4th 599 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County · Apr 24, 1992

Halpern v. Monroe County Tax Claim Bureau, 126 Pa. Commw. 35 , 558 A.2d 197 (1989). … Brown, Alston E. Vervoort and Thomas G.

Allen v. Cattaraugus County Board of Health

4 Misc. 3d 383 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 2004

In fact, the only case to consider this claim rejected it (see NYC C.L.A.S.H., Inc. v City of New York, 315 F Supp 2d 461 [SD NY 2004]). Petitioner also claims that he was denied due process. … Clearly, the requirements of procedural due process, notice of the charges and an opportunity to be heard (see Matter of McCann v Scaduto, 71 NY2d 164 [1987]) were met.

Color Printing Attachment Co. v. Brown

5 Jones & S. 433 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 1, 1874

This ruling was clearly erroneous, as it *436 raised a collateral issue leading to a comparison between attachments -that were somewhat, but not exactly, alike (Gouge v. Roberts, 53 N. Y. 619 ). … Worrall v. Parmelee, 1 N. Y. 519 ; Williams v. Fitch, 18 N. Y. 546 . The decision in Murray v. Smith, 1 Duer, 412 , as shown in Wilmot v.

Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. Brown

10 Jones & S. 522 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 25, 1877

Brown, 14 Q. B. 496; Dows v. National Exchange Bank, 91 U. S. 618 ; Turner v. Trustees of Liverpool Docks, 6 Excheq. 543). An early case is reported in 3 Camp. 92, Barrow v. … Their broker knew that it was “Milwaukee No. 2,” that it was then afloat on a canal boat, and had not then been delivered to any consignee (Dows v. Perrin, 15 N. Y. 325 ; Bank of Toledo v. Shaw, 61 Id. 283).

Brack Construction Corp. v. Board of Assessors

51 Misc. 2d 747 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1966

The petitioner asks the court to emphasize substance over form as the court did in Matter of Cale-Rome v. Board of Assessors of City of Rome ( 44 Misc 2d 675 ). … In Matter of Shanty Hollow Corp. v.

United Citizens v. Zoning Board of Appeals

109 Misc. 2d 1080 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1981

The purpose of the notice is to alert interested parties and afford them the opportunity to present their views to the zoning board. (Matter of Gerling v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Clay, 11 Misc 2d 84 .) … (Satin v Board of Stds. & Appeals of City of N.

Town of Greenburgh v. Board of Supervisors

53 Misc. 2d 88 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1967

(Town of Greenburgh v. Board of Supervisors, 49 Misc 2d 116.) On April 18, the board adopted a local law providing for an apportionment plan, which was submitted to the court for approval. … (Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 565 , supra.) Each citizen has, of course, the same right with respect to the processes of his county Board of Supervisors (Seaman v. Fedourich, 16 N Y 2d 94, supra).

Harris v. Board of Education

46 Misc. 3d 835 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 3, 2014

Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 17 AD3d 682, 683 [2d Dept 2005]). … Dist. v Hogan, 109 AD3d 817 , 817-818 [2d Dept 2013], citing Mobil Oil Indonesia v Asamera Oil [Indonesia], 43 NY2d 276, 281 [1977], and CSP Tech., Inc. v Hekal, 57 AD3d 372 [1st Dept 2008]; but see also Matter of Board of

Freedman v. Suffolk County Board of Supervisors

52 Misc. 2d 670 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1967

Board of Educ. ( 41 Misc 2d 391 ), also a mandamus proceeding, it was specifically held that the Board of Education though an arm of the State had standing to question the constitutionality of the statute in question. … This is not a case such as Matter of Mandle v. Brown (5 N Y 2d 51) in which a general reclassification based upon prior valid levels of work was upheld. Nor is it similar to Matter of Amann v. Finegan ( 253 App.

Snyder v. Town Board

27 Misc. 2d 645 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1961

(Wiggins v. Town of Somers, 4 N Y 2d 215.) … (Matter of Murphy v. Kraemer, 16 Misc 2d 374 .) This is a case where the very act of the plaintiff brought about the hardship complained of, and is on all fours with Matter of Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals ( 301 N.

Schenectady Illuminating Co. v. Board of Supervisors

88 Misc. 226 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1914

People v. Neff, 191 N. Y. 210 . … Beebe v. Supervisors of Sullivan County, 64 Hun, 377 ; affd., 142 N. Y. 631 ; Heughes v. Board of Education, 37 App. Div. 182 ; Matter of Taxpayers, 27 id. 365. This is the *228 principle of the common law. Smith v.

Knott v. Town Board of Oyster Bay

57 Misc. 2d 925 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1968

Village of Elmsford, 20 A D 2d 818), an action for an injunction (Cord Meyer Development Co. v. Bell Bay Drugs, 20 N Y 2d 211) or an article 78 proceeding (Matter of Lido Beach Civic Assn. v. … Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 13 A D 2d 1030).

Tran v. Brown

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 6, 2018

V. … Accord, Fernandez v. Quarry Hills Association L.P., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136884 at *27-*29 (D. Mass. 2010).

La Vecchia v. Board of Standards & Appeals

26 Misc. 2d 39 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1960

(Matter of New York Ambassador v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, 281 App. Div. 342 , affd. 305 N. Y. 791, 793 .) … Board of Stds. & Appeals, supra).

Madison v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors

82 Va. Cir. 106 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Jan 12, 2011

In this case, in accordance with the provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance, the Board of Supervisors has granted to the HDRC the authority to adopt operating procedures. … In summary, any challenge to the reasonableness of the actions of the HDRC is subject to administrative appeal to the Board of Supervisors and subsequent judicial review.

Board of Education v. Department of Highways

13 Ct. Cl. 60 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Nov 19, 1979

RULEY, JUDGE: This claim was originally filed by Andrew Jackson Junior High School, but during the testimony it was developed that the damaged vehicle, a 1974 Dodge van, was in fact owned by The Board of Education of the … Shortly thereafter, the brown van turned to the left for reasons unknown at that time to Nelson.

Cale-Rome, Inc. v. Board of Assessors

44 Misc. 2d 675 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1964

City of Watertown v. Gilmore, 166 Misc. 323 ; Matter of Bender v. Easson, 216 N. Y. S. 2d 393; Real Property Tax Law, § 1612). … Our decision bears in mind that in a sense the clerk of the board is an agent of convenience (People ex rel. City of Watertown v.

Baker v. Zoning Hearing Board

15 Pa. D. & C.5th 207 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County · Jul 14, 2010

Lantos v. Zoning Hearing Board of Haverford Township, 153 Pa. Commw. 591, 597 . 621 A.2d 1208, 1211 (1993). … Lando v. Springettsbury Township Zoning Board of Adjustment, 4 Pa. Commw. 312, 316-17 , 286 A.2d 924, 927 (1972).

Brown v. Solomon & Solomon, P. C.

181 Misc. 2d 461 · Albany City Court · May 21, 1999

Furthermore, in Ducrest v Alco Collections ( 931 F Supp 459, 462 [1996]), the court, citing the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Baker v G. C. Servs. … (Ducrest v Aleo Collections, 931 F Supp, at 462 .)

Brown v. Graffam

Superior Court of Maine · May 4, 2018

Graffam cites Dyer v. Me. … Cf America v. Sunspray Condo.