Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.29s
County of Erie v. Board of Trustees
62 Misc. 2d 396 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1970
(Matter of Divisich v. Marshall, 281 N. … (Matter of Fuhrmann v. Graves, 235 N. Y. 77, 80 .) The grant of such powers to the board of education negatives authority in the municipality to exercise like powers. (People ex rel. Wells & Newton Co. v. Craig, 232 N.
Cited 6 timesPublishedToth v. Board of Liquor Control
54 Ohio Law. Abs. 22 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Dec 6, 1948
This action is an appeal on law and fact from a decision of the Board of Liquor Control of the State of Ohio, Appellee, in pursuance to §154-73 GC rejecting the application of John Toth, Sr., d. b. a. … (See Farrand v. State Medical Board, Court of Appeals for the Second District of Ohio, 52 Abs 552 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedGardner v. Zoning Appeals Board
77 Va. Cir. 296 · Virginia Beach County Circuit Court · Nov 20, 2008
Board of Supervisors v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 268 Va. 441, 452 (2006). … (quoting Cochran v. Fairfax County Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 267 Va. 756, 766 (2004)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedAugustine v. E. M. Brown, Inc.
34 Pa. D. & C.2d 567 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County · Aug 24, 1964
Further, the court feels bound by the Supreme Court’s pronouncement in Kosco v. … This question is resolved against defendant, this court concluding that it is answered and controlled by the case of Stevenson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown Estate v. Government Employees Insurance
40 Pa. D. & C.3d 275 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · May 12, 1986
Brown and Regina J. Lazzaro, in her own right v. … In McMonagle v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedErhardt v. New York State Board
199 Misc. 131 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1950
Fershing v. … Paradowski v.
Cited 1 timesPublished23 Pa. D. & C.4th 238 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Mar 23, 1995
Ramondo v. Zoning Hearing Board, Haverford Township, 61 Pa. Commw. 242 , 434 A.2d 204 (1981); Whitpain Township Board of Supervisors v. Whitpain Township Zoning Hearing Board, 121 Pa. … Constantino v. Zoning Hearing Board, 152 Pa. Commw. 258 , 618 A.2d 1193 (1992); Chacona v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 143 Pa. Commw. 408 , 599 A.2d 255 (1991); King v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Hudson v. Board of Education
158 Misc. 583 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1936
The rights of individuals dealing with municipal authorities was well settled in Moore v. Mayor ( 73 N. … (Louisville v. Cumberland Telephone Co., 224 U. S. 649, 662 .)
Cited 7 timesPublishedBrown v. Housing Authority of Pittsburgh
34 Pa. D. & C.3d 59 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Sep 21, 1984
STRASSBURGER, J., Plaintiff, Pamela Brown, has appealed from this court’s order of July 18, 1984, striking the default judgment entered on May 25, 1984 against defend *60 ants, Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh … Planters Peanuts v. Neptune Jet Corp., 56 Luz. Leg. Reg. Rep. 40 (1965). *62 This is not to suggest that this court condones defendants’ delay in responding to discovery.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRotanelli v. Westchester County Board of Elections
41 Misc. 3d 254 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 5, 2013
The Board took no position on the motion. … Matter of Littlewort v Board of Elections in City of N.Y., 87 AD3d 642, 643 [2d Dept 2011] [petitioners complied with the order to show cause, “which permitted service, among other means, ‘by guaranteed express overnight
Cited 3 timesPublishedStrait v. Board of Commissioners
38 Pa. D. & C.3d 549 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fulton County · Mar 6, 1986
An aggrieved taxpayer may not proceed into the court of common pleas without first going through the assessment appeals board, unless he or she is attacking the validity of the taxing statute itself. Narehood v. … See also Rochester and Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Indiana County Board of Assessment, 438 Pa. 506 , 266 A.2d 78 (1970).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Supervisors of Livingston v. White
30 Barb. 72 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1859
(McBurney v. Cutler, 18 Barb. 203 .) It is proved that the bond was presented to the plaintiffs, and that *79 it was satisfactory to them. This was sufficient evidence of a delivery. … By § 99, (p. 865,) “ whenever the condition of the county treasurer’s bond shall be forfeited, to the knowledge of the board of supervisors of the county, and whenever such board shall be required to do so by the comptroller
Cited 3 timesPublishedCaruso v. Civilian Complaint Review Board
158 Misc. 2d 909 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1993
(Lefkowitz v Turley, 414 US 70, 77 [1973].) *913 In Garrity v New Jersey ( 385 US 493 [1967]), the Supreme Court held that if a police officer is threatened with being fired from his job unless he answers questions in an … (Matter of Matt v LaRocca, supra, at 159.) Use immunity requires no specific statutory authorization.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Seward Independent School District
64 Pa. D. & C. 616 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County · Aug 20, 1948
Wilson et ux. v. Philadelphia School District, 328 Pa. 225 , here controls on the constitutional question. … The court there distinguished the case of Minsinger v. Rau, 236 Pa. 327 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedMullen v. Zoning Hearing Board
35 Pa. D. & C.3d 542 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clinton County · Feb 4, 1984
DISCUSSION The standard of review on appeal in a zoning case is limited to a determination as to whether the board abused its discretion or committed an error of law. Soble Construction Co. v. … Zoning Hearing Board, 16 Pa. Commw. 599 , 329 A.2d 912 (1974); Surrik v. Zoning Hearing Board, 11 Pa. Commw. 607 , 314 A.2d 565 (1974).
Cited 0 timesPublishedLocal No. 1, Amalgamated Lithographers of America v. Brown
45 Misc. 2d 109 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1965
That doctrine is referred to in Bradley v. O’Hare ( 11 AD 2d 15 ) in an illuminating opinion by Mr. Justice Beeitel. … ALA questions plaintiff’s claim that it represents lithographers only (Brown’s affidavit of Aug. 8, 1964, p. 28). Brown claims that it represents photoengravers also. No facts to support this claim are set forth.
Cited 2 timesPublished3 Pa. D. & C.4th 98 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County · Dec 6, 1988
Both sides have cited Reese v. County Board of Elections of Lancaster County, 10 Pa. Commw. 448 , 308 A.2d 154 (1973). … A third case is cited by defendant, Chenet v. County Board of Elections of Westmoreland County, 56 Westmoreland L.J. 195 (1974).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Commissioners of Excise v. Purdy
36 Barb. 266 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1862
In Thayer v. … In the cases of The Ninety-nine Plaintiffs v. Vanderbilt, ( 1 Abb. 193 ,) the court required the attorney to exhibit his authority.
Cited 6 timesPublished3 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 122 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Jan 4, 1905
The Supreme Court in the ease of The City of Toledo v. … In the case of Kelly v.
Cited 0 timesPublished860 Executive Towers v. Board of Assessors
84 Misc. 2d 525 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1975
Yaras v Kinnaw, 303 NY 224, 231 ; People ex rel. Stewart v Feitner, 53 Misc 334 ). … Yaras v Kinnaw, 303 NY 224 , supra; Wolf v Assessors of Town of Hanover, 308 NY 416 , supra).
Cited 15 timesPublished
Ask Donna