Case law

Buchanan, Joyce v. Powe, Inc.

2017 TN WC 105 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 2, 2017

Thus, as noted by the Appeals Board, it is "critical" that "an employment relationship exist[ ed] at the time of injury." Duck v. Cox Oil Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 2, at* 13 (Jan. 21, 2016). … In Black v.

Asd Three Rivers Ma Solar, LLC v. the Planning Board of the Town of Wilbraham

Massachusetts Land Court · Apr 5, 2021

THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WILBRAHAM, MISC 19-000089 ASD THREE RIVERS MA SOLAR, LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WILBRAHAM, and JEFFREY A. SMITH, TRACEY PLANTIER, JOHN McCLOSKEY, JAMES E. … ORDERED that the special permit be issued forthwith by the Town of Wilbraham Planning Board to ASD Three Rivers MA Solar, LLC.

Hardy, Tracy v. Hershey Co.

2019 TN WC 96 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 27, 2019

Hardy's coworkers, Angela Woods and Danyiel Brown, testified by affidavit regarding their exposure to chemicals, mold, and asbestos at Hershey. Ms. Brown further observed Ms. … Johnson v. Pilgrim's Pride, Inc., et al., 2017 TN Wrk Comp App Bd LEXIS 18, at *3-4 (Feb. 13, 2017) (internal citations omitted).

Tedford, Daniel v. Energy Savers, LLC

2022 TN WC App. 8 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 22, 2022

Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

In re Brown

907 A.2d 684 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 2006

The Board has charged that Respondent’s conduct set out in Part A (paragraphs 1-9 of the Complaint) constitutes: 1. conduct which brings the judicial office into disrepute, a violation of Article V, § 18(d)(1) of the Pennsylvania … The Board has charged that Respondent’s conduct set out in Part C (paragraphs 18-23 of the Complaint) constitutes: 7. a violation of Article V, § 18(d)(1) of the Pennsylvania Constitution by engaging in conduct which brings

Irwin Mortgage Corp. v. Indiana Board of Tax Review

775 N.E.2d 720 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 30, 2002

As stated in Whetzel v. Department of Local Government Finance, the State Board was a creation of the Legislature and therefore only had those powers conferred by statute. Whetzel v. … See Whetzel v.

Pahokee Farms, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund

20 Fla. Supp. 2d 222 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Aug 9, 1985

for submission to the Board in February of 1984. … statement prior to its approval by the Board.

City of Jersey City v. Seaboard Terminal & Refrigeration Co.

19 N.J. Misc. 178 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 21, 1941

Rep. 96 ; General Motors Corp. v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1940), 124 N. J. L. 212; 11 Atl. … Rep. 306 ; Turnley v. Elizabeth (Supreme Court, 1908), 76 N. J. L. 42; 68 Atl. Rep. 1094 ; Schetty v. City of Jersey City (State Board, 1940), 18 N. J. Mis. R. 37; 11 Atl.

Jamestown Homes of Mishawaka, Inc. v. St. Joseph County Assessor

909 N.E.2d 1138 · Indiana Tax Court · Jul 24, 2009

When reviewing Indiana Board final determinations, the Court will defer to the Indiana Board's factual findings as long as they are supported by substantial evidence. Cedar Lake Conference Ass'n v. Lake County Prop. … The majority of those cases cited support the Indiana Board's final determination. See, e.g., Waterbury First Church Hous., Inc. v.

Opinion No. 70-254 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 28, 1970

The rule of statutory construction related to your question is stated in Brown v. … State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 (1962), follows: "Public officers have only such authority as is conferred upon them by law, and such authority must be exercised in the manner prescribed by law."

St. Joseph County v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

683 N.E.2d 1379 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 13, 1997

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives the decisions of the State Board great deference so long as the Board acts within the scope of its authority. Bender v. … Roehl Transp., Inc. v. Department of State Revenue, 653 N.E.2d 539, 541 (Ind.Tax Ct.1995).

Hillard v. Univ. of Cincinnati

2011 Ohio 1861 · Ohio Court of Claims · Apr 4, 2011

Garofalo v. Chicago Title Ins. … Brown George M. Reul Jr. Randall W.

Burnette, Gail v. K-Mart Corporation

2015 TN WC App. 2 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 20, 2015

Clay County Manor, Inc. v. State of Tennessee, 849 S.W.2d 755, 759 (Tenn. 1993) (quoting Southern Railway Co. v. … Akard v. Akard, No. E2013-00818-COA-R3-CV, 2014 Tenn. App. LEXIS 766, at * 11 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 25, 2014) (quoting Hessmer v. Hessmer, 138 S.W.3d 901, 903 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003)).

Pandolph v. State

155 Misc. 2d 612 · New York Court of Claims · Sep 28, 1992

297, 300 ; Easley v New York State Thruway Auth., 1 NY2d 374, 376-377 ; see, Matter of Brown v Board of Trustees, 303 NY 484, 489 ). … "stands on its own feet, transacts its business affairs through its own personnel and on its own initiative and is not subject to the strict requirements imposed upon a board or department of the State” (Matter of Plumbing

District Board of Trustees of Miami-Dade Community College v. King

19 Fla. Supp. 2d 200 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Dec 20, 1985

As noted in the case of Muldrow v. … See Seitz v. Duval County School Board, 346 So.2d 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). The rule applicable to district school boards define the term “gross insubordination” and may be consulted for guidance.

Green v. Condra

2009 NCBC 21 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 14, 2009

Green v. Condra, 2009 NCBC 21. … Brown Law LLP by Gregory W. Brown and Joshua M. Hiller for Defendants. Diaz, Judge.

Browne v. City of New York

102 Misc. 2d 28 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 12, 1979

The person making the payments must, in that case, bear the loss occasioned by his own neglect (Mayer v. Mayor of City of New York, 63 N. Y. 455 ; Board of Education of Town of Eastchester v. … Board of Education of City of Mt. Vernon, 267 App. Div. 871 affd 294 N. Y. 676 ).” (Matter of Quadrozzi Realty Corp. v Irizarry, supra, p 20, col 3.)

In re Banister

1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 399 · Rhode Island Vice Admiralty Court · Jul 1, 1746

. *400 Whereas John Banister of Newport mer4 hath this day presented a Petition to this Court setting forth the damages George Strout hath sustained In his Cargo on board the Schooner Jeremiah by Storms at sea, as Per Petition … We command you to request Cap4 John Beard, Cap4 Rob4 Gibbs, and Cap4 James Brown all of Newport afores3 to Inspect immediately into the Stowage of the Hold and condition of the Decks and in order to see how said Damages arose

Short Hills Associates v. Millburn Township

20 N.J. Tax 352 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 19, 2002

Stores Co. v. … In support of its position, plaintiff misapplies Brown v. Glen Rock Bor., 19 N.J.Tax 366 (App.Div.2001).

In re the Estate of Pace

93 Misc. 2d 969 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 14, 1977

(Eyerman v Mercantile Trust Co., 524 SW2d 210 [Mo]; Brown v Burdett, 21 Chan Div 667 [Eng 1882]; Colonial Trust Co. v Brown, 105 Conn 261; Board of Comrs. v Scott, 88 Minn 386; Scott, Trusts [2d ed], §§ 62.14, 124.7.) … In the early English case of Brown v Burdett (21 Chan Div 667, supra) the testatrix devised her house in trust with directions that the doors and windows be boarded, shuttered, bricked and sealed for 20 years and thereafter