Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.37s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 17, 2009
This issue was addressed in Luker v. Board of County Commissioners , 84 P.3d 773 (Okla.Civ.App. 2002). … Id.; see also Lutes v.
Cited 0 timesPublished108 Misc. 2d 1066 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 4, 1981
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v Brown ( 270 F Supp 782 , affd 392 F2d 120, cert den 391 US 921 ), cited by the Attorney-General as involving prohibited judicial State action, is readily distinguishable. … The mere supervision of and appointment of trustees by a probate court does not alone amount to proscribed State entanglement (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v Brown, 270 F Supp 782, 787 , supra).
Cited 2 timesPublishedHardgrow v. Office of Atty. Gen.
2011 Ohio 4853 · Ohio Court of Claims · Aug 8, 2011
See, e.g., Graham v. Board of Bar Examiners (1994), 98 Ohio App.3d 620; Jett v. Dallas Indep. School Dist. (1989), 491 U.S. 701; Burkey v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (1988), 38 Ohio App.3d 170. … Scholler v. Scholler (1984), 10 Ohio St.3d 98, paragraph one of the syllabus. {¶9} In support of its motion, defendant filed the affidavit of Amy Brown.
Cited 0 timesPublishedShoopman v. Clay Township Assessor
827 N.E.2d 662 · Indiana Tax Court · May 18, 2005
See, e.g., Greer v. … v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 1996
Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. … Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980). ¶ 15 The Board's rule on training outside the United States goes beyond the Legislature's statutory provisions.
Cited 0 timesPublishedO'Donnell v. Department of Local Government Finance
854 N.E.2d 90 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 21, 2006
STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the seope of its authority. Wittenberg Lutheran Vill Endowment Corp. v. Lake County Prop. … P'ship v. Brown Twp. Assessor, 851 N.E.2d 399 , 400 n. 2 (Ind. Tax Ct.2006); Long v. Wayne Twp. Assessor, 821 N.E.2d 466, 471-472 (Ind. Tax Ct.2005), review denied.
Cited 11 timesPublished61 A.3d 402 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 2012
Conduct of Magisterial District Judges, Article V, § 17(b), and Article V, § 18(d)(1) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. 5. … v.
Cited 4 timesPublished123 Misc. 955 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 21, 1924
Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Brown, 116 Misc. Rep. 184, 191 , quoting from Adams v. Swift, 169 App. … Brown, supra, quoting from Matter of Hermann, 178 App.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 1968
Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 . A thorough study of 74 O.S. 500 .1 [ 74-500.1 ] (1961) et seq., as amended, fails to reveal any authority for reimbursement of turnpike fees. … These rules and regulations are subject to the approval of the State Board of Affairs.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 30, 1969
All facilities and agencies of the State are under the Management and control of some state officer or group of officers in the form of board or commission. In the case of Brown v. … State Election Board, 369 P.2d 140 , our court quoted from Shaw v.
Cited 0 timesPublished150 Misc. 2d 606 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Apr 18, 1991
(Carey v Brown, supra, at 461-462.) … (Matter of Boung Jae Jang v Brown, 161 AD2d 49 .)
Cited 2 timesPublished2019 NCBC 9 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 6, 2019
See Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520, 523, 507 S.E.2d 894, 896 (1998). In construing a statute, a court “looks first to the plain meaning of the words of the statute itself.” State v. … Jenner v. Ecoplus, Inc., 224 N.C. App. 275, 277–78, 737 S.E.2d 121, 123 (2012) (citing Brown, 349 N.C. at 522–23, 507 S.E.2d at 895–96); see Coastal Ready- Mix Concrete Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 22, 1997
In re Bankoff, 875 P.2d 1138 , 1141 (Okla. 1994); Blue Circle Cement v. Board of County Commissioners, 27 F.3d 1499 , 1513 (10th Cir. 1994); see also Harris v. … Hadacheck v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2005
Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16, 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982) (footnote omitted). … DREW EDMONDSON Attorney General of Oklahoma DOROTHY BROWN Assistant Attorney General 1 Id. § 6536(4). 2 Id. § 6536(6). 3 Id. § 6538(D)(6). 4 Id. § 6542(E)(6). 5 Id. § 6535(B)(6). 6 Your question is related to disclosure under
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 1969
Title 57 O.S. 514 [ 57-514 ](d) (1968), made it the duty of the Division of Probation and Parole to "report to the Pardon and Parole Board, for recommendation to the Governor, violations of terms and conditions of paroles … Public Officers have only such authority as conferred upon them by law, and such authority must be exercised in the manner prescribed by law Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 .
Cited 0 timesPublished2026 TN WC 14 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 26, 2026
Brown v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., No. 01-S01-9010-CH-00090, 1991 Tenn. LEXIS 157, at *5-6 (Tenn. Apr. 15, 1991). The Court finds Mr. Floria intended to participate in horseplay with the other employees. … See Jordan v. United Methodist Ministries, 740 S.W. 2d 411, 412 (Tenn. 1987).
Cited 0 timesPublished59 S.W.2d 1080 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 3, 1933
for school of blind (article 3206); state board of canvassers (article 3068); state board of education (article 2664); state bureau of child and animal protection (article 4597); state naval board (article 5891); tax board … In Brown v. Wheelock, 75 Tex. 385 , 12 S. W. 111, 841 , it was held that the act of the district judge in removing the disabilities of a minor was not a judicial act. See, also, Cunningham v.
Cited 43 timesPublished1 Misc. 3d 723 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 16, 2003
(Davis v Waterside Hous. Co., 274 AD2d 318, 319 [1st Dept 2000]; Haddad Corp. v Redmond Studio, 102 AD2d 730 [1984]; Matter of Markow-Brown v Board of Educ. Port Jefferson Pub. … (Matter of Markow-Brown v Board of Educ., 301 AD2d at 653-654; Heller v Coca-Cola Co., 230 AD2d at 769 .)
Cited 1 timesPublished87 Misc. 2d 806 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Aug 13, 1976
, Judge Abruzzo and People v Perez, 79 Misc 2d 88 , Judge Goldfluss). … (See, also, People v Jackson, 72 Misc 2d 297 and Velez v Sugarman, 75 Misc 2d 746 .)
Cited 2 timesPublished142 Misc. 2d 1073 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 17, 1989
v New York Univ. … All that is absent is the donee’s rights vis-á-vis the corporation (Brown, Personal Property § 8.3 [3d ed]).
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna