Opinion

Hardgrow v. Office of Atty. Gen.

  • 2011 Ohio 4853
Court
Ohio Court of Claims
Filed
Aug 8, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
Weaver
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 32.2%

The opinion

[Cite as Hardgrow v. Office of Atty. Gen., 2011-Ohio-4853.]

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center

65 South Front Street, Third Floor

Columbus, OH 43215

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263

www.cco.state.oh.us

SIDNEY HARDGROW, SR.

Plaintiff

v.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Defendant

Case No. 2010-07598

Judge Clark B. Weaver Sr.

DECISION

{¶1} On June 13, 2011, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment

pursuant to Civ.R. 56(B). On June 15, 2011, plaintiff filed a response. The motion is

now before the court for a non-oral hearing pursuant to L.C.C.R. 4(D).

{¶2} Civ.R. 56(C) states, in part, as follows:

{¶3} “Summary judgment shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings,

depositions, answers to interrogatories, written admissions, affidavits, transcripts of

evidence, and written stipulations of fact, if any, timely filed in the action, show that

there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to

judgment as a matter of law. No evidence or stipulation may be considered except as

stated in this rule. A summary judgment shall not be rendered unless it appears from

the evidence or stipulation, and only from the evidence or stipulation, that reasonable

minds can come to but one conclusion and that conclusion is adverse to the party

against whom the motion for summary judgment is made, that party being entitled to

have the evidence or stipulation construed most strongly in the party’s favor.” See also

Gilbert v. Summit County, 104 Ohio St.3d 660, 2004-Ohio-7108, citing Temple v. Wean

United, Inc. (1977), 50 Ohio St.2d 317.

{¶4} On January 31, 2008, plaintiff’s employment as a corrections officer at

Richland Correctional Institution (RCI) was terminated. Plaintiff filed the instant claim

alleging inappropriate conduct by RCI’s counsel in Case No. 2008-07675, a claim that

he had filed regarding his termination. In his complaint in this matter, plaintiff asserts

both that defendant violated R.C. 2921.45 and the “constitution” by “interfering” with his

civil rights and that it “obstructed justice” in violation of R.C. 2921.32.

{¶5} It has been consistently held that this court is without jurisdiction to

consider claims for relief premised upon alleged violations of either the Ohio or United

States Constitution. See, e.g., Graham v. Board of Bar Examiners (1994), 98 Ohio

App.3d 620; Jett v. Dallas Indep. School Dist. (1989), 491 U.S. 701; Burkey v. Southern

Ohio Correctional Facility (1988), 38 Ohio App.3d 170. Moreover, R.C. 2921.45, a

criminal statute, does not provide for a civil remedy in this court. See Palmer v. Foley,

Montgomery App. No. 21235, 2006-Ohio-4013. Accordingly, plaintiff’s constitutional

and civil rights claims shall be dismissed.

{¶6} Plaintiff also asserts that defendant communicated false information which

resulted in intentional infliction of emotional distress. The entirety of plaintiff’s complaint

is based upon an e-mail from Assistant Attorney General Amy Brown, sent on

December 15, 2009, regarding subpoenas that had been issued by plaintiff.

{¶7} To the extent that plaintiff’s complaint sounds in tort, defendant is entitled

to judgment as a matter of law based upon the doctrine of absolute judicial immunity.

{¶8} “An attorney is immune from liability to third persons arising from his

performance as an attorney in good faith on behalf of, and with the knowledge of his

client, unless such third person is in privity with the client or the attorney acts

maliciously.” Scholler v. Scholler (1984), 10 Ohio St.3d 98, paragraph one of the

syllabus.

{¶9} In support of its motion, defendant filed the affidavit of Amy Brown. Brown

avers, in relevant part, as follows:

{¶10} “3. I was counsel of record for the Richland Correctional Institution in a

case filed by Sidney Hardgrow with the Ohio Court of Claims and identified as Case No.

2008-07675. A true and accurate copy of the Complaint in that matter is attached as

Exhibit 1 to this affidavit.

{¶11} “4. On November 24, 2009, the Court issued subpoenas to C.O. Kenney,

Mr. Scruggs and Lt. Melton at the request of Mr. Hardgrow. The subpoenas required

C.O. Kenney, Mr. Scruggs and Lt. Melton to attend and give testimony at the December

21, 2009 trial in Case No. 2008-07675 at the Ohio Court of Claims in Columbus, Ohio

and also require Mr. Scruggs’ [sic] to produce incident reports of fights at Richland

Correctional Institution between all staff on this date.

{¶12} “5. On November 24, 2009, I filed a motion to quash Mr. Scruggs, Lt.

Melton and Officer Kenney’s subpoenas arguing that those subpoenas were not

properly served because Mr. Hardgrow failed to tender the required witness fees and

mileage. A true and accurate copy of my motion to quash is attached as Exhibit 2 to

this affidavit.

{¶13} “6. Thereafter, on December 14, 2009, Judge Clark issued his decision

ruling that Mr. Scruggs, Lt. Melton and Officer Kenney’s subpoenas were invalid

because Mr. Hardgrow failed to tender the necessary witness fees and mileage. A true

and accurate copy of that decision is attached as Exhibit 3 to this affidavit.

{¶14} “7. On December 15, 2009, I emailed Judge Clark’s December 14, 2009

decision to my client. Mr. Hardgrow has attached a true and accurate copy of that email

to his Complaint in Case No. 2010-07598. I have no personal knowledge regarding

how Mr. Hardgrow obtained a copy of that email, which is protected by an attorney-

client privilege.

{¶15} “8. Mr. Hardgrow voluntarily dismissed Case No. 2008-07675 without

prejudice and refiled those claims as Case No. 2010-07512. I am counsel of record for

the Richland Correctional Institution in Case No. 2010-07512 and that matter is

currently pending before the Ohio Court of Claims. A true and accurate copy of the

October 13, 2010 amended Complaint in Case No. 2010-07512 is attached as Exhibit 4

to this affidavit.

{¶16} “9. I was acting in the course and scope of my employment with the state

of Ohio at all relevant times, including, but not limited to, my representation of the

Richland Correctional Institution in Case Nos. 2008-07675 and 2010-07512 and,

specifically, in sending the December 15, 2009 email to my client. I did not intend to

cause serious emotional distress to Plaintiff Hardgrow, nor did I know or have any

reason to believe that such distress would result from the email to my client. In fact, the

email was privileged and I never expected that Plaintiff Hardgrow would ever see the

email.”

{¶17} Construing the evidence most strongly in plaintiff’s favor, the court finds

that Brown’s actions of informing potential witnesses that the subpoenas served upon

them were deficient cannot be reasonably construed as malicious conduct. Moreover,

Brown’s actions clearly arose from her performance as an attorney and plaintiff has

brought forth no evidence to show that her actions were in bad faith. Therefore, the

court finds that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the totality of

plaintiff’s complaint. Accordingly, defendant’s motion for summary judgment shall be

granted and judgment shall be rendered in favor of defendant.

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center

65 South Front Street, Third Floor

Columbus, OH 43215

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263

www.cco.state.oh.us

SIDNEY HARDGROW, SR.

Plaintiff

v.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Defendant

Case No. 2010-07598

Judge Clark B. Weaver Sr.

JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶18} A non-oral hearing was conducted in this case upon defendant’s motion

for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth in the decision filed concurrently

herewith, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and judgment is

rendered in favor of defendant. Plaintiff’s constitutional and civil rights claims are

DISMISSED. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all

parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

_____________________________________

CLARK B. WEAVER SR.

Judge

cc:

Velda K. Hofacker Sidney Hardgrow, Sr.

Assistant Attorney General 109 Washington Avenue

150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor Mansfield, Ohio 44903

Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130

HTS/dms

Filed August 8, 2011

To S.C. reporter September 22, 2011

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.