Case law

Albritton v. Albritton Prop. Assocs., Ltd. P'ship

2021 NCBC 34 · North Carolina Business Court · Jun 7, 2021

In 1996, Bille, David, Deborah, and Charles formed a management board to manage the Bille Entities. (ECF No. 140.1 at ¶¶ 3, 7; ECF No. 130.5, at pp. 14–15.) The management board held monthly meetings. … Schmaus Co. v.

Knowles v. N.C. Department of Corr.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 23, 2009

. § 143-291 (a) confers upon the North Carolina Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear negligence claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … Pulley v. Rex Hospital 326 N.C. 701 , 705 , 392 S.E.2d 380 , 383 (1990). 3.

In re Felipe O.

96 Misc. 2d 401 · New York Family Court · Aug 28, 1978

Though the court has discretion in a Judge-trial to consider suppression issues on a voir dire in the course of trial (People v Brown, 24 NY2d 168 ), here a pretrial determination to afford guidance to both sides seemed expedient … (However, in view of the Brown rule the motion Judge obviously is not disqualified from conducting the trial.

Hickey v. Bomark Fabrics, Inc.

111 Misc. 2d 812 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Nov 23, 1981

This class shall include hotels, lodging houses, rooming houses, boarding houses, boarding schools, furnished room houses, lodgings, club houses, college and school dormitories”. 2 Although the parties dispute whether the … (Goodman v Ramirez, 100 Misc 2d 881 .)

ADP of New Jersey, Inc. v. Parsippanytroy Hills Tp.

14 N.J. Tax 372 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 18, 1994

The constitutionality of Chapter 91 has been affirmed in Ocean Pines, Ltd. v. Point Pleasant Bor., 112 N.J. 1 , 547 A.2d 691 (1988). … Central Bergen Props. v. Elmwood Park, 6 N.J.Tax 495 (Tax 1984).

Williamson v. Outsource Partners

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 8, 2006

See Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co., 305 N.C. 593 , 290 S.E.2d 682 (1982); Dalton v. Anvil Knitwear, 119 N.C. App. 275 , 458 S.E.2d 251 (1987); and Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution, 108 N.C. … Holley v. ACTS, Inc., 357 N.C. 228 , 581 S.E.2d 750 (2003); Young v. Hickory Bus. Furn., 353 N.C. 227 , 230 , 538 S.E.2d 912 , 915 (2000); Ballenger v. ITT Grinnell Indus.

Sizes & Shapes, Inc. v. Roselle Borough

New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 31, 2017

Presumption of Validity “Original assessments and judgments of county boards of taxation are entitled to a presumption of validity.” MSGW Real Estate Fund, LLC v. Borough of Mountain Lakes, 18 N.J. … Brown v. Borough of Glen Rock, 19 N.J. Tax 366, 376 (App. Div. 2001), certif. denied, 168 N.J. 291 (2001) (internal citation omitted)).

Owens, Sheila v. Sitters, Etc.

2023 TN WC App. 52 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 17, 2023

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Sheila D. … Hubble v. Dyer Nursing Home, 188 S.W.3d 525, 535 (Tenn. 2006) (citing Vinson v. United Parcel Serv., 92 S.W.3d 380, 386 (Tenn. 2002)).

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Hamilton

2 Mills Surr. 202 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1901

No proof is made of the value of the board and lodging so received. … Ross v. Hardin, 79 N. Y. 84, 90 ; Lind v. Sullestadt, 21 Hun, 364 , 366; Sullivan v. Sullivan, 6 id. 658; Hendricks v. Isaacs, 117 N. Y. 411, 418 .

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 26, 1990

as provided in subsection B of this section, after February 1, 1990, applicants for certification and license shall: 1. show proof of certification or licensing by a program or governmental entity approved by the State Board … Roach v. Atlas Life Insurance Company, 769 P.2d 158 (Okla. 1989).

Opinion No. 74-162 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 30, 1975

Title 19 O.S. 174 .1 [ 19-174.1 ] (1971), gives the State Examiner and Inspector authority upon filing of report of audit of the books, records and accounts of county officers, boards or commissions to publish in a newspaper … Erwin v. Wheeler, 31 Okl. 331 , 120 P. 1098 (1912).

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 1985

Cf., Oklahoma City News Broadcasters Assoc., Inc. v. Nigh , 683 P.2d 72 (Okla. 1984). … No. 79-41, citing Maddox v.

In re Scheuer

5 Dem. Sur. 369 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 15, 1887

By pursuing this course, the respondents have relieved the petitioner from the disqualification established by § 829 (Smith v. Crawford, 3 Hun, 585 ; Marsh v. Brown, 18 Hun, 319 ; Potts v. Mayer, 86 N. … Y., 302 ; Wadsworth v. Heermans, 85 N. Y., 639 ; Estate of Stanley, N. Y. Surrog. Dec., May 27th, 1886).

Opinion No. 71-424 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 6, 1972

Co. v. Arrow Industrial Manuf. Co., 297 P.2d 410 . … See also Harn v. State ex rel Williamson, 87 P.2d 127 ; Oklahoma City v. Local Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n of Okla. City, 134 P.2d 565 ; 29A C.J.S. Eminent Domain 21. Mr.

In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Dorrity

118 Misc. 725 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1922

Hook v. Pratt, 8 Hun, 102 . No positive dishonesty of purpose is required to show constructive fraud. Forker v. Brown, 10 Misc. Rep. 161 . … Grant v. Grant, 1 Sandf. Ch. 235; Matter of Purdy, 46 App. Div. 33 ; Early v. Early, supra; Knapp v. Knapp, 10 N. Y. 276 ; Perry v. Perry, 21 N. Y. Supp. 133 ; Matter of Kennedy, 167 N. Y. 163 ; Harris v.

In re the Estate of Markowitz

152 Misc. 1 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1934

(Underhill v. Newburger, 4 Redf. 499, 506 ; Matter of Taber, 30 Misc. 172,180,181 ; affd., 54 App. Div. 529 ; Matter of Brown, 86 Misc. 187, 188 ; affd., 167 App. Div. 912 ; affd., 217 N. … Y. 681 ; Little v. McClain, 134 App. Div. 197, 200 ; Skelly v. Mortimer, 154 id. 921), wherefore the particulars in this regard will be furnished by the contestants.

Spencer v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 080425c (or.tax 9-24-2008)

Oregon Tax Court · Sep 24, 2008

STATEMENT OF FACTS Plaintiffs appealed the value of their property 1 for the 2007-08 tax year to the county board of property tax appeals (board), and the board reduced their real market value (RMV) from $698,130 to $573,130 … Gall v. Dept. of Rev. , 17 OTR 268 , 270 (2003). Plaintiffs' belief that there is a formulaic relationship between RMV and AV is incorrect. RMV represents the market value ( i.e. , likely selling price) of a property.

Sheryl Alemany v. Twp. of Marlboro

New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 30, 2024

PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FACTS On May 7, 2023, plaintiff timely filed a complaint with this court appealing the judgment of the Monmouth County Board of Taxation (“County Board”). … Therefore, the judgment of the County Board is reversed.

Bagley v. Spruill

1 Posey 277 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 24, 1880

In Neill v. Brown, 11 Tex., 17 , where an act was passed on the 7th of February, A.

Womack, Angela v. Yorozu Automotive TN

2016 TN WC 153 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 30, 2016

Cha Yang v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., 440 S.W.3d 593, 600 (Tenn. 2014). … Lay v. Scott Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t., 109 S.W.3d 293, 299 (Tenn. 2003).