Case law

St. Mary's Medical Center of Evansville, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

534 N.E.2d 277 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 27, 1989

In LeSea Broadcasting Corp. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners (1988), Ind. … The applicability of legislative acquiescence to cases such as this one is seriously in doubt after the Indiana Supreme Court’s decision in Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners v.

In re the Legacy Given by the Will of Mills

121 Misc. 147 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1923

The residuary legatees are the Board of Home Missions of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America and the Board of Foreign Missions of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America. … In Brown v. Condit, 70 N. J. Eq. 440, the court discussed the principles involved in the query and held upon the facts of that case that the doctrine of cy-pres did not apply as there was no charitable intention.

Gonsalves v. Cumberland County B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 23, 2001

The North Carolina School Board Insurance Trust is the carrier on the risk. 2.

Hi-Temp, Inc. of Decatur County v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

645 N.E.2d 680 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 9, 1995

Knauf Fiber Glass, GmbH v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs (1994), Ind.Tax, 629 N.E.2d 959, 961 . Moreover, “[t]he State Board is accorded great deference when acting within the scope of its authority.” Wirth v. … Hi-Temp also insists that the case of State Board of Tax Commissioners v.

In re the Estate of Luckenbach

46 Misc. 2d 864 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 30, 1965

The corporation had an independent board of directors; its officers were elected by the board; it paid corporation taxes; its creditors treated the company as a corporation; and all indications were that this was a multimillion … Y. 234 ; Matter of Dix, 34 Misc 2d 421 ; Matter of Browning, 258 App. Div. 621 ). The petitioner’s contentions could only be asserted by the corporation.

Sevilla-Palma, Norvin v. Wauford Air Conditioning, Inc.

2016 TN WC 167 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 19, 2016

The controlling case for this defense is Mitchell v. Fayetteville Public Utilities, 368 S.W.3d 442 (Tenn. 2012),3 which the Appeals Board cited as applicable to cases under the Reform Act of 2013 in Gonzales v. … See Kelly v. Kelly, 445 S.W.3d 685, 694-695 (Tenn. 2014).

People v. Bowers

72 Misc. 2d 800 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Jan 8, 1973

In People v. … The prosecution cites People v.

Stanley v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr.

2012 Ohio 6351 · Ohio Court of Claims · Oct 29, 2012

Brown, a head bleed following acoustic neuroma surgeries is a rare but known risk of the surgery. Dr. Brown agreed with Dr. … Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc., 63 Ohio St.3d 84, 93 (1992).

Opinion No. 67-331

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 1967

OPINION — AG — THE ATTORNEY GENERAL APPLIES THAT FAMILIAR RULE THAT PUBLIC OFFICERS HAVE ONLY SUCH AUTHORITY AS IS CONFERRED UPON THEM BY LAW, AND SUCH AUTHORITY MUST BE EXERCISE IN THE MANNER PRESCRIBED BY LAW, BROWN V. … STATE ELECTION BOARD, OKL. 369 P.2d 140 , AND IN ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION ADVISES YOU THAT THERE IS NO STATUTE THAT GIVES YOU A DUTY OR AUTHORITY TO COMMENCE AN ACTION TO TERMINATE A PARENT'S PARENTAL RIGHTS TO HIS CHILD.

Board of Directors of Millennium Homeowners Ass'n v. Bosco

8 Misc. 3d 950 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 25, 2005

Condominium I v Albert, 168 Misc 2d 587 [1996]). … Seaview Assn. of Fire Is. v Williams, 69 NY2d 987, 989 (1987).

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 1967

OPINION — AG — THE ATTORNEY GENERAL APPLIES THAT FAMILIAR RULE THAT PUBLIC OFFICERS HAVE ONLY SUCH AUTHORITY AS IS CONFERRED UPON THEM BY LAW, AND SUCH AUTHORITY MUST BE EXERCISE IN THE MANNER PRESCRIBED BY LAW, BROWN V. … STATE ELECTION BOARD, OKL. 369 P.2d 140 , AND IN ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION ADVISES YOU THAT THERE IS NO STATUTE THAT GIVES YOU A DUTY OR AUTHORITY TO COMMENCE AN ACTION TO TERMINATE A PARENT'S PARENTAL RIGHTS TO HIS CHILD.

Opinion No. 77-243 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 1977

Hedges v. Groom, 151 P.2d 936 (okl. 1944). … Cuzalina, 520 P.2d 656 (Okl. 1974); Wade v. Brown, 516 P.2d 526 (Okl. 1973). The earlier statute will not be repealed by a latter statute unless there is irreconcilable conflict. Gulf Oil Co. v.

Oaken Bucket Partners, LLC v. Hamilton County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals

909 N.E.2d 1129 · Indiana Tax Court · Jul 24, 2009

Cf., e.g., State Bd. of Tax Com'rs v. … See also, e.g., State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs v.

Jackson County Assessor v. Brown, 4389 (or.tax 8-13-1999)

Oregon Tax Court · Aug 13, 1999

On February 10, 1999, a magistrate issued a written decision in Brown v. Jackson County Assessor, OTC-MD 982848D. On February 22, 1999, a motion for reconsideration was filed and was denied by order dated March 4, 1999. … On April 12, 1999, a Complaint was filed in the Regular Division entitled Jackson County Assessor v. Sandra Brown.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Brown

129 Misc. 293 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 8, 1927

Brown, in his individual capacity. … (McMaster v. Gould, 240 N. Y. 379, 386 ; Matter of Walsh, 126 Misc. 479 .)

Dallas Consol. Electric St. Ry. Co. v. City of Dallas

260 S.W. 1034 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 23, 1924

Bank v. Hanks, 104 Tex. 320 , 137 S. W 1120, Ann. Cas. 1914B, 368. … In the case of Hutcheson v. Storrie, 92 Tex. 685 , 51 S. W. 853 , 45 L. R. A. 289. 71 Am. St.

Morris v. People

3 Denio 381 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1846

In The People v. … The same principle was decided in Smith v. Brown, ( 1 Wend. 231 .) There the defendant was sued for a penalty given for altering or counterfeiting a brand upon a barrel of flour, unfit for exportation.

Herrera, Jesus v. Pedro Luna and Turcios Masonry

2020 TN WC 116 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 3, 2020

.: 2019-05-0765 Employee, ) 2019-05-0764 V. ) ) PEDRO LUNA, ) State File Nos. 49239-2019 And, ) 47819-2019 TURCIOS MASONRY, ) Employers, ) And, ) ) BUSINESSFIRST INS. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Board of Managers of Patchogue Homes Corp. Condominium No. 1 v. Islar

171 Misc. 2d 704 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Feb 4, 1997

The notice further stated that: "under the business judgment rule, the Board of Managers of Patchogue Homes Corp. … (See, condominium by-laws art IV ["Managers”], § 12 ["Powers and Duties of the Board”], subd [E].)

350 East 62nd Street Associates v. Vecilla

182 Misc. 2d 68 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Oct 4, 1999

The appellate courts have addressed this problem in Ram I v Stuart ( 248 AD2d 255 [1st Dept 1998]), Giddings v Waterside Redevelopment Co. … (NYLJ, June 30, 1998, at 26, col 1 [App Term, 1st Dept]), Ariel Assocs. v Brown (NYLJ, Apr. 14, 1999, at 26, col 2 [App Term, 1st Dept]), as well as El-Kam Realty Co. v Epstein ( 148 Misc 2d 835 [App Term, 1st Dept 1990])