Case law

Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Department of Revenue

8 Or. Tax 97 · Oregon Tax Court · Mar 6, 1979

In the case of Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of Eq., 329 US 69 , 67 S Ct 156 , 91 L Ed 80 (1946), the court held that movement had started, although no common carrier was involved. … Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of Eq., 329 US 69 , 67 S Ct 156 , 91 L Ed 80 (1946).

Amos, Harvey v. Goodman Global Group

2016 TN WC 249 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 20, 2016

McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015). … The Appeals Board will consider the Affidavit of Indigency and issue an Order granting or denying the request for a waiver of the filing fee as soon thereafter as is practicable.

Drake v. Lane County Assessor, Tc-Md 080394c (or.tax 2-4-2009)

Oregon Tax Court · Feb 4, 2009

Plaintiffs appealed to the county board of property tax appeals (board), and the board sustained that land value. Plaintiffs appealed that decision to this court. … Feves v. Dept. of Revenue , 4 OTR 302 , 312 (1971). "[I]f the evidence is inconclusive or unpersuasive, the taxpayer will have failed to meet his burden of proof." Reed v.

In re the Estate of Altman

115 Misc. 476 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1921

Brown v. Quintard, 177 N. Y. 75, 83 , quoting from Mann v. Mann, 1 Johns. Ch. 231 ; Fries v. Osborn, 190 N. Y. 35 ; Matter of Lummis, 101 Misc. Rep. 258 ; Matter of Douglas, 97 id. 208; Jessup-Redfield, 551. … La Frinz v. Whitney, 195 App. Div. 131 ; Fulton Trust Co. v. Phillips, 218 N. Y. 573 ; Cammann v. Bailey, 210 id. 19; Herzog v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 177 id. 86; Ritch v. Hawxhurst, 114 id. 512. Mr.

Spatt v. State

76 Misc. 2d 114 · New York Court of Claims · Aug 4, 1972

Claimant alleges that he had qualified for a scholarship of the type awarded by the State of New York through the Board of Regents and the Education Department. … Board of Regents of Univ. of Cal., 273 Cal. App. 2d 430, app. dsmd. 396 U. S. 554; Starns v. Malkerson, 326 F. Supp. 234 , affd. 401 U. S. 985 ).

Barker v. Smith

1 Dem. Sur. 290 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1883

He ought not to have bought it, and ought not to be allowed to retain it against objection, even if it were admitted that he purchased in good faith and paid adequate consideration (Terwilliger v. Brown, 44 N. … Y., 40; Whelan v. Lynch, 60 N. Y., 469 ; Ormsby v. Copper Mining Co., 56 N. Y., 623 ; Tyng v. Warehouse Co., 58 N. Y., 308 ).

People v. Strax

80 Misc. 2d 679 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Jan 17, 1975

According to Adlerstein v. … According to People v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1978

DELASHAW) ** SEE: 639 P.2d 1239 , SHADID V. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD ** OPINION NO. 77-264 IS OVERRULED WITHDRAWN

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Collin Duel, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 31

2026 OK AG 2 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 17, 2026

Citing Meyer v. Doty , 1963 OK 5 378 P.2d 309 Meyer does not support such a conclusion. … Faced with dueling appointments to fill the position by the district judge and the board of county commissioners, the court held that the board of county commissioners' appointee was the proper individual to fill the county

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 5, 1950

OPINION — AG — ** COUNTY COMMISSIONERS — INDEBTEDNESS — JUDGMENT ** FOR GOOD AND VALID CONSIDERATIONS (AS THAT TERM IS USED AND DEFINED IN THE LAW OF CONTRACTS), BUT " ONLY FOR SUCH A CONSIDERATION " THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS … (COURT CASE, LITIGATION, ABANDONMENT, CLAIM, JUDGMENT) CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 53, 19 O.S. 3 [ 19-3 ], 19 O.S. 1 [ 19-1 ], 19 O.S. 339 [ 19-339 ] (JAMES C. HARKIN)

In re Starr

59 Pa. D. & C.2d 597 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Nov 16, 1972

MALIN, Chairman, This matter is before the board on an appeal filed by David C. … The board has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter. 2.

Bioskryb Genomics, Inc. v. Aclarity Genomics Inc.

2026 NCBC 51 · North Carolina Business Court · Jun 8, 2026

Around that time, West formed a new company called AClarity Genomics, Inc., and in May 2024, he resigned from BioSkryb’s board of directors. … v. Arias, 2011 NCBC LEXIS 21, at *16 (N.C. Super. Ct. July 5, 2011); see also Farr Assocs., Inc. v. Baskin, 138 N.C.

Opinion No. (1993)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 10, 1993

IN WAY V. … PAWNEE COUNTY EXCISE BOARD V.KERN, 187 OKL. 110, 101 P.2D 614 SUPRA.

Sheffield v. Clackamas County Assessor, Tc-Md 090001c (or.tax 3-11-2009)

Oregon Tax Court · Mar 11, 2009

It is unclear whether Plaintiffs appealed the value to the county board of property tax appeals (board). … Sheffield asserted that his wife sent a petition to the board on December 16, 2008, but that they did not hear back from the board. Healy stated that his office has no record of a board appeal.

Hurd, James v. Kellogg Company

2018 TN WC 207 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 26, 2018

In Thompson v. Comcast, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … Recently, the Board clarified the analysis in Travis v. Carter Express, Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS — (Dec. 21, 2018).

Jett, Kimsue v. CBC Group, Inc., Cgristian Brands, Inc.

2021 TN WC 170 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 7, 2021

Love v. Delta Faucet Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 45, at *15-16 (Sept. 19, 2016). Similarly, parties cannot rely solely on their own medical interpretations to support their arguments. Lurz v. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Smith v. Hare Pipeline Const. Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 24, 2000

Additionally, plaintiffs work of maneuvering the boards on and off the trailer was difficult and awkward due to the length of the boards. … Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Company , 305 N.C. 593 (1982).

Lenox, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation

20 N.J. Tax 464 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 4, 2002

Hence, on balance equity demands that the Board be permitted to recoup moneys paid under such circumstances and rectify its error. [ Id. at 42, 469 A.2d 58 .] See also Board of Educ. of Passaic v. … In United States v.

Amaya, Tanya v. Sims Recycling Solutions, Inc.

2020 TN WC 17 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 5, 2020

01:40 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE Tanya Amaya, ) Docket No. 2019-06-1559 Employee, ) V. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Baird

129 Misc. 78 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1927

Y. 381 ; Haug v. Schumacher, 166 id. 506 ; Meeks v. Meeks, 161 id. 66.) … Law, § 42; Brown v. Quintard, 177 N. Y. 75 ; Matter of Wilcox, 194 id. 288; Matter of Hitchcock, supra), and it follows that the trust is invalid and that the residue must be distributed as in a case of intestacy.