Case law

Adair v. Department of Revenue

17 Or. Tax 311 · Oregon Tax Court · Jan 29, 2004

V. CONCLUSION Taxpayer’s Complaint was untimely and must be dismissed. The county’s Motion to Dismiss should be granted. … Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed. 1 All references to the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) are to 2001. 2 One element of delay for taxpayer was that following receipt of her tax bill, she took her first appeal to the county board

Sheffield v. Clackamas County Assessor, Tc-Md 090001c (or.tax 3-11-2009)

Oregon Tax Court · Mar 11, 2009

It is unclear whether Plaintiffs appealed the value to the county board of property tax appeals (board). … Sheffield asserted that his wife sent a petition to the board on December 16, 2008, but that they did not hear back from the board. Healy stated that his office has no record of a board appeal.

Holmes v. Tennant

231 S.W. 313 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 1, 1921

Brown, a feme sole, by special warranty deed. On November 14, 1899, the case was again dismissed for want of prosecution. On November 17, 1899, L. E. Brown conveyed the land to J. H. … Soell v. Hadden, 85 Tex. 182 , 19 S. W. 1087 ; De Bruhl v. Maas, 54 Tex. 472 ; Alstin v. Cundiff, 52 Tex. 462 ; Gray v. Shelby, 83 Tex. 408 , 18 S. W. 809 .

Verizon New Jersey Inc. v. Hopewell Borough

26 N.J. Tax 400 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 26, 2012

Feldman v. … State Bar Ass’n v.

Orban v. Alexandria Township

21 N.J. Tax 1 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 8, 2003

The municipality argues that this case is not akin to West Milford Township v. … In Mountain View Crossing Investors, L.L.C. v.

Jones v. State

5 S.W.2d 973 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 9, 1928

Stuart v. Baker, 17 Tex. 417 ; Gibbons v. Bell, 54 Tex. 417 ; Shannon v. Taylor, 16 Tex. 413 ; Cooper v. Austin, 58 Tex. 494 ; Johnson v. Johnson, 65 Tex. 87 ; Wardlow v. Miller, 69 Tex. 395 , 6 S. W. 292 ; Cravens v. … Rep. 803 ; Aycock v. Kimbrough, 71 Tex. 330 , 12 S. W. 71 , 10 Am. St. Rep. 745 ; Betts v. Simmons (Tex. Civ. App.) 35 S. W. 50 ; Brown v. Humphrey, 43 Tex. Civ. App. 23 , 95 S. W. 23 ; Cowan v. Brett, 43 Tex. Civ.

In re Detmold's Estate

3 N.Y.S. 555 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 30, 1888

Rundell v. … Rundell v.

Kennedy, Justin v. Paladin Attachments

2015 TN WC 180 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 10, 2015

Simpson v. Satterfield, 564 S.W.2d 953, 955 (Tenn. 1978); See also Gray v. Cullom Mach., Tool and Die, Inc., 152 S.W.3d 439, 443 (Tenn. 2004); Gluck Brothers, Inc. v. Coffey, 431 S.W.2d 756, 759 (Tenn. 1968). … See Carter v.

Platt v. Moore

1 Dem. Sur. 191 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1883

Upon this subject, the decision in Isenhart v. Brown ( 2 Edw. Ch., 341) seems never to have been questioned. … She may justly claim, however, as directly within the doctrine asserted, in Isenhart v.

King's Medical Supply Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Corp.

194 Misc. 2d 667 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 14, 2003

Co. v RCR Bldrs., 268 AD2d 574 [2d Dept 2000].) … (See Dailey v Estate of Grogan, NYLJ, Oct. 3, 2003, at 19, col 1 [Civ Ct, NY County].)

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Baird

129 Misc. 78 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1927

Y. 381 ; Haug v. Schumacher, 166 id. 506 ; Meeks v. Meeks, 161 id. 66.) … Law, § 42; Brown v. Quintard, 177 N. Y. 75 ; Matter of Wilcox, 194 id. 288; Matter of Hitchcock, supra), and it follows that the trust is invalid and that the residue must be distributed as in a case of intestacy.

Batey, Christopher v. Deliver This, Inc.

2018 TN WC App. 2 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 6, 2018

Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Kirk, Regina v. Amazon.com, Inc.

2015 TN WC 136 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 8, 2015

See Pentecost v. … In Lambert v.

Timmerman, Ryan v. Indta Dry of Knoxville,

2016 TN WC 87 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 18, 2016

Bargery v. Obion Grain Co., 785 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. 1990). Determining whether an individual worked as an employee or an independent contractor requires a specialized factual analysis. Masiers v. … Boruff v. CNA Ins. Co., 795 S.W.2d 125, 127 (Tenn. 1990).

Dale Engineering Co. v. State

114 Misc. 233 · New York Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1921

Munro v. State of New York, 223 N. Y. 208 ; Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. v. Canal Board, 204 id. 471; Trustees Exempt Firemen’s Benev. Fund v. Roome, 93 id. 313; Wheeler v. … Co. v. Columbus, 249 U.

Livingston v. State Tax Commission

1 Or. Tax 461 · Oregon Tax Court · Jan 31, 1964

The Board [now the United States Tax Court] rightly applied to them the law as it stood when the gains became taxable.” … Justice Jackson in Arrowsmith v. Commissioner, 344 US 6, 11 , 97 L ed 6, 11 (1952).

Hutley v. New York State Thruway Authority

139 Misc. 2d 868 · New York Court of Claims · May 11, 1988

(Supra; Hofstra Coll, v Board of Trustees, 145 NYS2d 323 , affd without opn 3 AD2d 712 .) The statutory authority for the regulation of traffic is codified in the Vehicle and Traffic Law. … Carlisle v Board of Supervisors, 217 NY 424 ; Farrell v Town of N Salem, 205 NY 453 ; Allen v Village of Holley, 226 App Div 294 ; see also, Ball v County of Monroe, 79 AD2d 878 , lv denied 52 NY2d 706 , supra; Gunn v Good

Noel, Darlene v. Ean Holdings, LLC

2016 TN WC 282 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 29, 2016

Further, the Court finds guidance in Lewis v. Merry Maid, No. 2015-06- 0456, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 19 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Apr. 20, 20 16). … Right to Appeal : Tennessee Law allows any party who disagrees with this Expedited Hearing Order to appeal the decision to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board.

Partilla, Stephen v. Velocity Ventures, Inc.

2016 TN WC App. 56 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 31, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Stephen Partilla ) Docket No. 2016-03-0502 ) v. … Hubbard v. Sherman-Dixie Concrete, Indus., No. E2010-02219-WC-R3-WC, 2011 Tenn. LEXIS 965, at *11 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Oct. 18, 2011) (quoting State v. Farrell, 277 S.W.3d 372, 378 (Tenn. 2009)).

Dyer, Jimmy v. Tankersley Concrete

2015 TN WC 83 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 14, 2015

McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015). … The Judge must approve the statement of the evidence before the Court Clerk may submit the record to the Clerk of the Appeals Board. 6.