Case law

In re the Probate of an Alleged Nuncupative Will of Gwin

1 Tuck. Surr. 44 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 1, 1870

(Morrell v. Morrell, 1 Hagg., 51; In the Goods of Hayes, 2 Curteis, 338.) A cook on board a steam ship has been held t„o be a mariner. (In re Thomson, 4 Brad., *45 159 .) … (The Thomas Jefferson, 10 Wheaton, 428 ; Steamboat Orleans v. Phoebus, 11 Peters R., 175.) In Pegroux v.

Palmer v. Stephens

1 Denio 471 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Oct 15, 1845

(Brown v. The Butchers' and Drovers' Bank, 6 Hill, 443 ; Williamson v. Johnson, 1 Barn. & Cress. 146; Bank v. Flanders, 4 N. Hamp. R. 239, 247, 8.) … (Rogers v. Coit, 6 Hill, 322 ; South Carolina Bank v. Case, 8 Barn. & Cress. 427.)

Opinion No. 76-261 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1976

Title 19 O.S. 734 [ 19-734 ] (1971), provides, in part: "Whenever the board of county commissioners of any county considers it to be to the best interest of the county to acquire sites, purchase, erect, repair, remodel, equip … Morris v. City of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Okl., 229 P.2d 131 (1965). A discussion of a hypothetical fact situation might be helpful to indicate the legislative intent.

In re the Estate of Dickman

142 Misc. 207 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 16, 1931

Y. 158 ; Matter of Akin, 248 id. 202 ; Matter of Raymond v. Davis, Id. 67; Matter of Cook, 244 id. 63; Matter of Winter, 231 App. Div. 519 ; Matter of Ashner, Id. 127; Heavner v. Clarke, 229 id. 786; McLean v. … Div. 831 ; Matter of Seaman, 205 id. 681; Matter of Van Buren v.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 31, 1989

Cherry v. … Bohart v. Anderson, 103 P. 742 (Okla. 1909).

Kinge v. State

20 Misc. 3d 161 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 13, 2007

OPINION OF THE COURT Nicholas V. … Relying upon the Court of Appeals decision in Brown v State of New York ( 89 NY2d 172 [1996]), defendant contends that a negligent supervision cause of action may not be maintained in the absence of an actionable underlying

Opinion No. Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 6, 1986

OPINION — AG — ** HORSE RACING COMMISSION — BINDING RULES AND REGULATIONS — BINDING EFFECT ** AN ADMINISTRATIVE BODY, SUCH AS A BOARD, AGENCY OR COMMISSION, "CANNOT" ENACT IRREPEALABLE RULES OR REGULATIONS OR LIMIT OR RESTRICT … (RULES AND REGULATIONS, CHANGE) CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 54, OPINION NO. 69-221, 75 O.S. 303 [ 75-303 ], 75 O.S. 308 [ 75-308 ](E) (NEAL LEADER)

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 1988

Tulsa Tribune Company v. … Cavett v.

Marshall, Tara v. Mueller Company

2016 TN WC App. 30 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 11, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Tara Marshall ) Docket No. 2015 ... 01-0147 ) v. … WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Tara Marshall ) Docket No. 2015-01-0147 ) v.

In re the Accounting of Miller

199 Misc. 396 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 28, 1951

(City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Evans, 255 App. Div. 135 ; Matter of Arms [Tiffany Foundation], 193 Misc. 427 ; Matter of Hamersley, 152 Misc. 903 .) … Bank v. Board of Supervisors of Otsego Co. ( 51 N.

Roth v. Penguin Toilets, LLC

2011 NCBC 45 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 30, 2011

other officers and managers as the Board may determine. … Int’l Paper Co. v. Corporex Constructors, Inc., 96 N.C. App. 312, 317, 385 S.E.2d 553, 556 (1989) (citing Silver v. Board of Transp., 47 N.C. App. 261, 267 S.E.2d 49 (1980)); see also Schenkel & Shultz, Inc. v.

Opinion No. 75-337

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 7, 1976

GAMINO) SEE: LOWERY V. OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD — 584 P.2d 720

Iboy, Olga Esperanza v. Kenten Management< LLC

2018 TN WC App. 21 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 8, 2018

Hensley delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge Timothy W. Conner joined. W. … As we have previously observed, it is not the role of the Appeals Board to address issues in the first instance. See Buckner v. Eaton Corp., No. 2016-01-0303, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 84, at *12 (Tenn.

Edmonson v. State

132 Misc. 2d 452 · New York Court of Claims · Jun 23, 1986

Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130 .) … It appears that the Departmental Review Board *455 construes this provision to include the date of confinement. (Cf. General Construction Law § 20.)

Aronson v. Markulin

39 Misc. 2d 273 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Feb 25, 1963

Brown, 19 Misc 2d 957 [App. Term, 1st. Dept.]; South Carolina Leasing Co. v. Allen, 32 Misc 2d 659 [App. Term, 2d Dept.]; Joffe v. Drake Business School, 35 Misc 2d 442 [App. Term, 2d Dept.]; Fordham Hill Associates v. … Fiebach, 21 Misc 2d 277 ; Best Realty Corp. v. Luftig, supra; Farrell v. Woodward, 101 Misc. 560 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]; Giordano v. Loperfide, 203 App. Div. 164 [1st Dept.]; Commercial Cable Bldg. Co. v.

Sirkin, Shawn v. Trans Carriers, Inc.

2015 TN WC 140 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 12, 2015

Tindall v. Waring Park Ass'n, 725 S.W.2d 935, 937 (Tenn. 1987); Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, No. 2015-01-0055, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Aug. 18, 2015). … State v. Good Times, Ltd, No. E2007-1172-COA-R3-CV, 2008 Tenn. App. LEXIS 551, at * 11 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 23, 2008).

Llano Granite & Marble Co. v. Hollinger

212 S.W. 151 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 28, 1919

The evidence upon this issue is in substance as follows: On June 7, 1909, the board of directors of the «laintiff corporation passed the following resolution: “Meeting of the board of directors of the Ulano Granite & Marble … Matheney v. City, 82 Kan. 720 , 109 Pac. 166 , 28 L. R. A. (N.S.) 980; McLemore v. Hawkins, 46 Miss. 715 ; De Clark v. Waters, 10 Wyo. 31 , 65 Pac. 855 ; Zimpleman v. Veeder, 98 Ill. 613 ; Garlick v. James, 12 Johns.

County of Cayuga v. State

112 Misc. 517 · New York Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1920

Wing, 7 Hill, 159 ; National Bank of Ballston Spa v. Board of Supervisors, 106 N. Y. 488 ; New York & Hudson Railroad Co. v. Marsh, 12 id. 308; Flower v. … Village of Fort Edward v. Fish, 156 N. Y. 364 ; Donohue v. City of New York, 10 Hun, 37 ; Board of Supervisors v. Ellis, 59 N. Y. 620 ; Ward v. Barnum, 10 Col. App. 496; Wayne Co. v. Reynolds, 126 Mich. 231 ; Bayne v.

Moore, Jeffrey v. Transforce, Inc.

2021 TN WC 220 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 27, 2021

See Hardin v. Royal & 3 Mr. Moore’s later refusal to return to Dr. Kaminski is another matter entirely. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Opinion No. 72-224 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 28, 1972

(Board of Education v. Chickasha, 195 Okl. 127 , 155 P.2d 723 (1945); Healdton v. Board of Education, 204 Okl. 579 , 232 P.2d 148 (1951). … However, a Utah case, Murray City v. Board of Education, 396 P.2d 628 (1964) has been cited as authority for the proposition that a tap charge is a charge for a benefit created.