Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.61s

  • Opinion No. 71-271 (1971) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1971

    Board of Education of Wynnewood School District I-8, Okl. 344 P.2d 572 , on page 573, the Court quoted the case of Skelly Oil Co. v. … Again, we must go to the case of Board of Equalization of Oklahoma County v. Bonner, supra, which states that the homestead exemption should be strictly construed against the exemption.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hicks

    265 S.W. 381 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Oct 29, 1924

    Hicks, who was living in Brown-wood, Tex., went to Georgetown, Tex., and secured employment as a table waiter in a hotel at that place, and continued in that work until after the 28th of the following April. … In Western Union Telegraph Co. v. McDaniel, 103 Ind. 294 , 2 N. E. 709 , the message was addressed thus: “To Mrs. Da Fountain, Kankakee.”

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 75-131 (1975) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 10, 1975

    lawfully appropriate and direct transfer of any money in the Depletion, Management and Sale Fund to the Capitol Improvement Authority Fund in order to pay for the use of quarters and facilities by other state agencies, boards … In Betts v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1986)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 21, 1986

    Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16 of Payne County , 648 P.2d 26 ,29 (Okla. 1982). … The State Board of Health has the authority to insure compliance with the Act through the powers to revoke or suspend licenses issued under the Act . 59 O.S. 1689 (1985) . MICHAEL C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Meeks, Bryant v. Nyrstar Clarksville, Inc.

    2023 TN WC 34 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 9, 2023

    The Appeals Board considered somewhat similar circumstances in Morgan v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 76 (Dec. 3, 2019). … The Board affirmed a denial of summary judgment in an occupational disease claim.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith Bros., Inc. v. Lucas

    26 S.W.2d 1055 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 30, 1930

    Gorman v. State, 42 Tex. 221 . The divorce decree did not result in a dissolution of these relations. … Wolfe v. Buckley, 52 Tex. 641 ; Holloway v. Holloway, 86 Ga. 576 , 12 S. E. 943 , 11 L. R. A. 518, 22 Am. St.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 16, 1969

    MONROE)SEE: GOODIN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 601 P.2d 88

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Van Doren

    9 Mills Surr. 290 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1912

    Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y. 378 . … Brown v. Clark, supra. . How it came to pass that the name of Edward B. David appeared as a residuary legatee in the first duplicate, but not in the second, one can only conjecture.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rosenthal Dry Goods Co. v. Hillebrandt

    7 S.W.2d 521 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 13, 1928

    In Russell v. … R. v. Dickey, 108 Tex. 126 ,. 187 S. W. 184 ; Gonzales v. mores (Tex. Civ. App.) 200 S. W. 851 ; Texas, etc., Co. v. Barton (Tex. Civ. App.) 213 S. W. 689 .

    Cited 79 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1999)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 23, 1999

    See Grubb v. … See Maule v. Indep. Sch Dist. No. 9, 714 P.2d 198 , 200 (Okla. 1985).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Washington, John v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc.

    2018 TN WC App. 34 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 2, 2018

    He reported at least two of the physicians to their state licensing board. … State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith, Angel v. Trustpoint Hospital, LLC

    2020 TN WC 80 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 28, 2020

    Patterson v. Huff & Puff Trucking, 2018 TN. Wrk. Comp. Bd. LEXIS 33, at *9 (July 6, 2018). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reeves v. N.C. Department of Correction

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 30, 2011

    Pursuant to Tort Claims Act, the General Assembly has conferred upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction over tort claims filed "against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments … The Act is in partial derogation of sovereign immunity, see Stone v. N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Foskey v. N.C. Department of Correction

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 12, 2011

    . § 143-291 (a) confers upon the North Carolina Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear negligence claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … Bolkhir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Doraville Enterprises v. Commonwealth

    73 Pa. D. & C.2d 635 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Oct 21, 1975

    Compare Newport Homes et al. v. Kassab et al., 17 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 317 , 332 A. 2d 568 (1975). … For the board to decide important issues brought before it on the basis of the promptings of members of the public would not be consistent with the quasi-judicial nature of the board’s functions.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tipton v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

    2012 Ohio 1254 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jan 13, 2012

    McPeek v. Leetonia Italian-Am. … Brown Jason E. Tipton, #A476-875 Ashley L. Oliker P.O. Box 120 Kristin S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ed Stevenson and E-Car Auctions v. Tony Morris

    Delaware Court of Common Pleas · Mar 4, 2014

    Tony Morris Brown, Shiels & Beauregard, LLC 939 Janvier Ct. 502 S. State St. … Stevenson’s and E» Car Auctions’ motion to vacate default judgment This appeal is governed by Ney v. Poll`te, 399 A.2d 527 (Del. 1978).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilkins v. N.C. Department of Correction

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 24, 2011

    . § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkhir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nickels v. N.C. Department of Correction

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 20, 2009

    . § 143-291 confers the North Carolina Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of … Stat. § 143-291 et seq. ; Ayscue v. Highway Commission , 270 N.C. 100 , 153 S.E.2d 823 (1967); Woolard v. DOT , 93 N.C. App. 214 , 377 S.E.2d 267 , cert. denied , 325 N.C. 230 , 381 S.E.2d 792 (1989). 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leutwyler v. N.C. Department of Correction

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 6, 2011

    . § 143-291 (a) confers upon the North Carolina Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear negligence claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … Bolkhir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.