Case law

People v. Chalupa

57 Misc. 3d 815 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Sep 18, 2017

(People v Dreyden, 15 NY3d 100, 103 [2010].) … This discourse among the lower courts culminated in the recent Court of Appeals case of People v Brown ( 28 NY3d 392 [2016]).

Rcj Corp. v. Dept. of Revenue, Maricopa Cty.

168 Ariz. 328 · Arizona Tax Court · Jun 10, 1991

A.R.S. § 42-246 authorizes property tax appeals to the Tax Court from other than decisions of the State Board of Tax Appeals. … In County of Maricopa v. Chatwin, 17 Ariz.

People v. Esteves

85 Misc. 2d 217 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Jan 5, 1976

Brown, J. Following a preliminary hearing defendant moves to dismiss the misdemeanor information under which he is charged with violation of section 215.10 of the Penal Law, tampering with a witness. … (People v Grogan, 260 NY 138 ; People v Lang, 36 NY2d 366 ; United States v Harriss, 347 US 612 .)

Cook. Lisa v. Newton Nissan of Gallatin/Newton Ford, LLC

2022 TN WC 81 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 21, 2022

Ducros v. Metro Roofing and Metal Supply Co., Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 62, at *9 (Oct. 17, 2017). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Department of Environmental Resources v. Warren Sand & Gravel Co.

62 Pa. D. & C.2d 679 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Aug 8, 1973

See Everson v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 395 Pa. 168, 171 , 149 A. 2d 63 , (1959); Henry Jacobs v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment, 1 Comm. 197, 273 A. 2d 746 (1971); Derr Flooring Co. v. … Whitemarsh Township Zoning Board of Adjustment, 4 Comm. Ct. 341, 285 A. 2d 538 (1972). And see Bortz Coal Co. v. Commonwealth, 2 Comm. Ct. 441, 279 A. 2d 388 (1971).

Baumgardner , William v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

2017 TN WC App. 61 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 18, 2017

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD William Baumgardner ) Docket No. 2015-05-0619 ) v. … See Seiber v. Reeves Logging, 284 S.W.3d 294, 298 (Tenn. 2009); Hadzic v. Averitt Express, No. 2014-02- 0064, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App Bd. LEXIS 14, at *9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 2000

Dear State Senate, Littlefield ¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following question: Can a Board of County Commissioners in Oklahoma enter … See Cox v. Dawson, 911 P.2d 272 , 276 (Okla. 1996).

In re Bologna

199 Misc. 705 · New York Family Court · Jun 5, 1950

(Bunim v. Bunim, 298 N. Y. 391, 394 .) … The children have already had the experience of boarding for a short time in a Catholic boarding school and the father had to take them out because they were unhappy there.”

Blevins v. Cameron & Mayfield

2 Posey 461 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jul 1, 1882

McFadden v. Crumpler, 20 Tex., 376 . This rule was re-affirmed in Stansberry v. Nichols, 30 Tex., 149 ; Brown v. Ector, 19 Tex., 346 ; Haynes v. Stovall, 23 Tex., 625 . … Gaylord v. Loughridge, 50 Tex., 576 ; Campbell v. Fields, 35 Tex., 754 .

AHS Hospital Corp. v. Town of Morristown

28 N.J. Tax 456 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 25, 2015

The Hospital and Atlantic have a “mirror board” of trustees, which means that the same trustees that serve on the Hospital’s board also serve on Atlantic’s board. … V.

Butler, Larry v. AAA Cooper Transportation

2017 TN WC 114 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 7, 2017

d., citing Phillips v. A & H Constr. Co., 134 S.W.3d 145, 148 (Tenn. 2004) (Emphasis added). … d. at *29, citing Mitchell v. Fayetteville Pub. Utils., 368 S.W.3d 442, 455 (Tenn. 2012).

People v. Alvarez

101 N.Y.S.3d 702 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Mar 28, 2019

The court also asked *135 the Parole Board to "not let these defendants out. Please make them serve their maximum sentence under law[.]" ***310 Both now and when Mr. … He has not even asked to be granted a chance to ask the Parole Board to consider paroling him.

In re the Estate of Hastings

183 Misc. 520 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 12, 1944

J., February 5, 1944, p. 490, col. 1; Matter of Brown, 183 Misc. 470 ; Matter of Selig, N. Y. L. J., April 7, 1944, p. 1359, col. 5.) … Our courts would not undertake to enforce such a tax (State of Colorado v. Harbeck, 232 N. Y. 71 ; Matter of Martin, 255 N.

Mauck v. Cherry Oil Co., Inc.

2021 NCBC 59 · North Carolina Business Court · Sep 20, 2021

v. Piedmont Nat. … Corp. v.

In re the Estate of Ethier

142 Misc. 441 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1932

(Sands v. Sparling, 82 Hun, 401, 402 ; Lashaw v. Croissant, 88 id. 206, 207; Carver v. Wagner, 51 App. Div. 47, 50 ; Briggs v. Devoe, 89 id. 115, 118 .) … (Minehan v. Hill, 144 App. Div. [3d Dept.] 854, 859.)

Russell v. Department of State

26 Fla. Supp. 2d 239 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Jul 1, 1987

Florida Department of Transportation v. J.W.C. … Agrico Chemical Co. v. Department of Environmental Regulation, 406 So.2d 478 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

In re the Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.

186 Misc. 172 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 13, 1945

In such circumstances the courts would not disturb the position taken by the board not to declare more dividends than they actually did (Roberts v. Roberts-Wickes Co., 184 N. Y. 257 ; Ochs v. … In Wilberding v.

In re the Estate of Sweeney

155 Misc. 461 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 8, 1935

(Matter of Brown, 252 N. Y. 366, 374, 375 ; Matter of Brunswick, 143 Misc. 573, 578, 579, 580 ; Matter of Brady, 228 App. Div. 56, 60 .) … (McKenna v. Meehan, 248 N. Y. 206, 213 ; Hodgman v. Cobb, 202 App. Div. 259 ; Matter of Gambrill, 135 Misc. 516 .) These sections are applicable to personal property. (Matter of De Rycke, 99 App. Div. 596 ; Ullman v.

Morgan v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2011 Ohio 3151 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jun 7, 2011

[Cite as Morgan v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2011-Ohio-3151.] … See Reynolds v.

Lake County Trust Co., Trust No. 6, (Flowers for Heaven, Inc.) v. St. Joseph County Assessor

66 N.E.3d 630 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 30, 2016

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On April 25, 2016, the Trust initiated an original tax appeal challenging a final determination of the Indiana Board of Tax Review. … (See Pet’r V. Pet. Original Tax Appeal of Final Determination Ind. Bd. Tax Review at ¶ 8.) On May 6, 2016, the Indiana Board notified the Trust by letter that the certified administrative record was complete.