Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.18s
Lincoln Hills Development Corp. v. Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners
521 N.E.2d 1360 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 22, 1988
The State Board also relies on Don Meadows Motors, Inc. v. State of Indiana, Board of Tax Commissioners (1988), Ind. … In State Board of Tax Commissioners v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMueller-Rice, Meagan v. MEDATAG, Inc. d/b/a Poblanos Mexican Cuisine
2022 TN WC 9 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 4, 2022
Buchanan v. Mission Ins. Co., 713 8.W.2d 654, 656 (Tenn. 1986). By failing to give Ms. … See Russell v. Genesco, Inc., 651 S.W.2d 206, 211 (Tenn. 1983). Further, Dr. Brown is designated as Ms. Mueller-Rice’s authorized physician for future medical care.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Department of Revenue
Oregon Tax Court · Aug 3, 2012
BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) TC-MD 111014N ) … Feves v. Dept. of Revenue, 4 OTR 302, 312 (1971). “[I]f the evidence is inconclusive or unpersuasive, the taxpayer will have failed to meet [her] burden of proof.” Reed v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCredle v. N.C. Department of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 9, 2008
Stat. § 143-291 (a) confers the North Carolina Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … Pulley v. Rex Hospital , 326 N.C. 701 , 392 S.E.2d 380 (1990).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Ass'n of Miniature Enthusiasts v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
671 N.E.2d 218 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 18, 1996
Encyclopaedia, 663 N.E.2d at 1232 ; K & I Asphalt, 638 N.E.2d at 903 . *220 FINDINGS OF FACT This court may not consider facts that were not presented to the State Board. Hi-Temp, Inc. of Decatur County v. … State Board Order and Written Findings at 3. A.
Cited 10 timesPublishedSony Music Entertainment, Inc. v. Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners
681 N.E.2d 800 · Indiana Tax Court · May 22, 1997
STANDARD OF REVIEW The determinations of the State Board are accorded great deference when the Board is operating within the scope of its authority. Dav-Con, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 644 N.E.2d 192, 194 (Ind. … National Assoc. of Miniature Enthusiasts v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 671 N.E.2d 218, 220 (Ind. Tax Ct.1996) (quoting St. Mary’s Med. Ctr., Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 534 N.E.2d 277, 280 (Ind.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBrown v. Multnomah County Assessor
Oregon Tax Court · Jan 10, 2012
Plaintiff asked Babcock if he had copies of information Plaintiff submitted for the board of county property tax appeals. … Schaefer v. Dept. of Rev., TC No 4530 at 4 (July 12, 2001) (citing Feves v. Dept. of Rev., 4 OTR 302 (1971)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSterling Management-Orchard Ridge Apartments v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
730 N.E.2d 828 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 26, 2000
John v. … CDI, Inc. v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1975
In the case of Brown v. … Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corporation v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedVANDERFORD, MICHAEL v. E.S. DOCKERY COMPANY
2025 TN WC 26 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 13, 2025
Brown did not keep his handwritten notes of their conversation but created a report on August 28, 2025. As to the symptoms Mr. … See Sanker v. Nacarato Trucks, Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 27, at *12 (July 6, 2016).
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlmax Builders, Inc. v. City of Perth Amboy
1 N.J. Tax 31 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 26, 1980
Isadore Brown, the president of plaintiff Almax Builders, Inc., testified on behalf of plaintiff. … This practice was followed, also without comment, in Gannon v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 N.J.L. 450 , 9 A.2d 531 (Sup.Ct.1939); Atlantic City Electric Co. v.
Cited 28 timesPublishedTaylor, Angela v. Knox County Board of Education and Knox County Givernment
2017 TN WC 233 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 18, 2017
McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … As the Appeals Board explained in Panzarella v. Amazon.com, Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Reciprocal Ins. Ass'n v. Stadler
166 S.W.2d 121 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 11, 1942
Ass’n v. Sewell, Tex.Civ.App., 32 S.W.2d 262 , writ refused. … Brown v. Mitchell, 88 Tex. 350 -357, 31 S.W. 621 , 36 L.R.A. 64 ; Berger v. Kirby, 105 Tex. 611 -615, 153 S.W. 1130 , 51 L.R.A.,N.S., 182.
Cited 20 timesPublished29 Fla. Supp. 2d 252 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Dec 11, 1987
Gray’s expert opinion, Respondent’s personal performance in the classroom has seriously reduced her effectiveness as an employee of the Dade County School Board. 45. Dr. … ; * * * (h) Has otherwise violated the provisions of law or rules of the State *260 Board of Education, the penalty for which is the revocation of the teaching certificate.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPlainfield Elks Lodge No. 2186 v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
733 N.E.2d 32 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 2, 2000
See State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Fraternal Order of Eagles, Lodge No. 255, 521 N.E.2d 678, 681 (Ind.1988). In addition, this Court stated in Foursquare Tabernacle Church of God in Christ v. … See State Board of Tax Commissioners v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCominco Products, Inc. v. State Tax Commission
2 Or. Tax 157 · Oregon Tax Court · May 27, 1965
Brown v. Maryland, 25 US (12 Wheat) 419, 6 L Ed 678 (1827); Low v. Austin, 80 US (13 Wall) 29, 20 L Ed 517 (1871). … *161 In State v. Board of Review, City of Milwaukee, supra, and Parrot & Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 15, 2003
Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 946 P.2d 1140 , 1144 (Okla. 1997). Absent a showing of fraud or arbitrariness, a finding by a governing body that a project serves a public purpose will not be disturbed by the courts. … Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 946 P.2d 1140 , 1144 (Okla. 1997); Grimes v. City of Oklahoma City, 49 P.3d 719 , 726 (Okla. 2002).
Cited 0 timesPublishedU.S. Steel Corp. v. Lake County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals
785 N.E.2d 1209 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 1, 2003
McGinnis, 34 Ind. 452, 454 (1870) (voiding the acts of an unlawfully constituted board of equalization); Donch v. … See Central Realty, Inc. v. Hillman's Equipment, Inc., 253 Ind. 48 , 246 N.E.2d 383, 389 (1969); Young v. Citizens' St. R. Co., 148 Ind. 54 , 47 N.E. 142 , 143 (1897); Union Sch. Tp. v. First Nat.
Cited 7 timesPublishedKnox County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals v. Grandview Care, Inc.
826 N.E.2d 177 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 29, 2005
The Knox County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals (PTABOA) appeals the final determination of the Indiana Board of Tax Review (Indiana Board) granting Grandview Care, Inc. … STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the scope of its authority. Miller Village Prop. Co., LLP v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedLouis D. Realty Corp. v. Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners
743 N.E.2d 379 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 18, 2001
John v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 690 N.E.2d 370, 386-387 (Ind. Tax Ct.1997) (St. John III), rev'd in part on other grounds by State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Town of St. … In Clark v.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna