Case law

Town of New Lebanon v. State

14 Misc. 310 · New York Court of Claims · Mar 15, 1920

See Garr v. Bright, 1 Barb. Ch. 157 ; Kiersted v. People, 1 Abb. Pr. 392 ; Coster v. City of Albany, 43 N. Y. 399 ; People v. Dennison, 84 id. 272; Rexford v. State of New York, 105 id. 229; Locke v. … State of New York, *316 140 id. 480; Smith v. State of New York, 227 id. 405; Cunningham v. Macon & Brunswick R. R. Co., 109 U. S. 446 ; Board of Liquidation v. McComb, 92 id. 351; Briscoe v.

Wilson, Louis v. O. G. Kelley and Company

2019 TN WC App. 13 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 15, 2019

Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … Pentecost v. Anchor Wire Corp., 695 S.W.2d 183, 185 (Tenn. 1985). In Mahle, Inc. v. Rouse, No. E2005-02432-WC-R3-CV, 2006 Tenn. LEXIS 939 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp.

Opinion No. (1986)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 1986

Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief and Pension Fund of City of Tulsa v. Naughton , 173 P.2d 425 , 426 (Okla. 1946) (emphasis added). … Firemen's Relief and Pension Board v. Ozment , 467 P.2d 502 (Okla. 1970); Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief and Pension Fund in and for City of Tulsa v. Naughton , 68 P.2d 845 (Okla. 1937).

Opinion No. 73-185 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 1973

In the case of Smith v. … In the body of the opinion in the case of State ex rel Hamilton v.

Opinion No. 80-031 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 2, 1980

Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners, 468 P.2d 501 , 507 , 508 (Okl. 1970), held: "Counties have only such authority as is granted by statute. Citing cases . . . … The Board of County Commissioners in exercising corporate powers is limited to those fields expressly assigned to such subdivisions of the state by the legislature. Citing cases . . .

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 8, 1979

The State Motorpool is created under the direction of the State Board of Public Affairs by the provisions of 47 O.S. 159 .1 (1971). … See Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal CIT Credit Corp. 301 P.2d 212 (Okla. 1956).

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 10, 1989

CLOUD V. … OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD, 696 P. 2D 10 (OKL. APP. 1984), WHERE THE MAJORITY OPINION DEEMS THE SUPREME COURT TO HAVE MODIFIED CLOUD IN ITS LATER OPINION IN STONE V.

In re the Estate of Heughes

144 Misc. 922 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 17, 1932

Div. 715 ) the contestant asked the privilege of a “ general examination ” of the proponent, on the authority of Herbage v. City of Utica ( 109 N. … (Citing Matter of Hodgman, [1920] 113 Misc. 215 ; Matter of Oakley, Id. 135; Matter of Kimmerle, 130 id. 767, and Sands v. Comeford, 211 App. Div. 406 .)

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1979

Dear Director Edmison, The Attorney General is in receipt of your request for an opinion wherein you ask, in effect, the following question: May the Pollution Control Coordinating Board adopt a rule or regulation which redefines … Co. v.

Opinion No. 80-039 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1980

Ponca City v. Edwards, Okl., 460 P.2d 418 (1969). … The Legislature has left to the municipal governing board the discretion as to which form of financial institution may be utilized.

Jeban Realty Corp. v. State

194 Misc. 492 · New York Court of Claims · Jan 21, 1949

(Hayden v. Pierce, 144 N. Y. 512, 516 .) … Y. 233, 238 ; citing Sexauer & Lemke v. Burke & Sons Co., 228 N. Y. 341, 345 . See, also, Matter of Moore v. Board of Education, Canandaigua, 274 App. Div. 403, 410 .)

Munyan, Bart v. PCL Industrial Construction Co.

2016 TN WC 121 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 18, 2016

In Willis v. All Staff, No. 2014-05-0005, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *27-8 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. … See also Sirkin v. Trans Carriers, Inc., No. 2015-08-0292, 2016 TN Work. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *7-8 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd.

In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Jacobs

8 Mills Surr. 299 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1911

In case of Morris v. … . *306 In the case of Brown v. Butchers & Drovers’ Bank, 6 Hill, 443 , a man became charged as an indorser by writing the figures “ 1-2-3 ” on the back of a note.

City of Hackensack v. Hackensack Medical Center

9 N.J. Tax 460 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 6, 1988

Overlook Hospital Ass’n v. Summit, 6 N.J.Tax 90 (Tax Ct.1983), aff’d per curiam 6 N.J.Tax 350 (App.Div.1984); Summit v. … Accordingly, the judgment of the county board is reversed and the original assessment will be restored.

In re the Property of Wood

7 Mills Surr. 542 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1910

Brown, S. This is an appeal from an order made in the above-entitled matter upon the report of Hon. Robert Averill,. appraiser, which order was entered on D'ecember 4, 1909. … Ford v. Knapp, 102 N. Y. 142 ; Jones v. Duerk, 25 App. Div. 551 ; Satterlee v. Kobbe, 173 N. Y. 91 .

Mays, Timothy v. Matthew Pearson, d/b/a Handyman Construction

2019 TN WC 67 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 26, 2019

See Hackney v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 29, at *8- 9 (July 22, 2016). Because Dr. Youseff has already provided substantial care to Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Myers, Althea v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

2018 TN WC 194 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 4, 2018

See Lewis v. Molly Maid, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 19, at *8-9 (Apr. 20, 2016). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Mann, Geraldine v. ACA Transport, LLC

2021 TN WC 191 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 21, 2021

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2020); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Ms. … More importantly, the Appeals Board has held that a nurse practitioner’s opinion, standing alone, is not enough to establish causation; a doctor’s expertise is required. Noel v. EAN Holdings, LLC, TN. Wrk. Comp. App.

In re the Construction of the Will of Markowitz

205 Misc. 267 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1953

The proviso for payment over of the remainder of Dorothy’s trust indicates that decedent intended it to be an active trust (Brown v. Spohr, 180 N. Y. 201, 209 ; Matter of Black, 33 N. Y. S. 2d 359, affd., 262 App. … Div. 582 ; Morse v. Morse, 85 N.

Montgomery v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 28, 2005

. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkir v. N.C. State University, 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 3.