Case law

Case of Wheeler

1 Armstrong. Election Cases 83 · New York State Assembly · Jan 17, 1829

also testified that a short time after the election, a number of persons were collected at his store and a conversation was held upon the subject of the late election, and the loss of votes claimed for the Jackson elector, v … No reprehension can be too severe, and scarcely any punishment too rigorous, if the inspectors of this board of election are guilty of that with which they are charged.

People v. Ventura

196 Misc. 2d 989 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Aug 26, 2003

(See People v Gonzalez, 173 AD2d 845, 848 [1991] [Brown, J., dissenting].) *991 At the- Gonzalez suppression hearing, the issue was whether the defendant had voluntarily accompanied the arresting officers from his home to … As Justice Brown pointed out in his dissent ( 173 AD2d at 847-848 ), with which the Court of Appeals agreed when it subsequently reversed the Appellate Division (see People v Gonzalez, 80 NY2d 883 [1992]): “the only witness

Opinion No. 92-604 (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 29, 1992

CITY OF DUNCAN V. BINGHAM, 394 P.2D 456 (OKLA.1964). … BECAUSE RELATED LEGISLATIVE ENACTMENTS MUST BE CONSTRUED TOGETHER, JOHNSON V.

Hardin, Gregory v. W.A. Kendall & Co., Inc.

2019 TN WC 26 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 14, 2019

In Andrews v. Yates Serv., LLC, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22 (May 8, 20 18), the Appeals Board held that, although the amended definition does not directly apply to injuries prior to its enactment, like Mr. … Criminal Plea, Brandon Moore 10 The Court reserved ruling on the admissibility of this document until it had an opportunity to review the Appeals Board's decision in Kizer v. Express Servs. Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp.

In re Becker

72 Pa. D. & C.2d 711 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Jan 23, 1976

COHEN, Member, This matter is before the board on the appeal of K. … Loudon Hill Farm, Inc. v. Milk Control Commission, 420 Pa. 548 , 217 A.2d 735 (1966); Committee to Preserve Mill Creek, supra . . .”: 342 A.2d at 475 .

Faulkner, Ivon v. United Parcel Service

2020 TN WC 77 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 24, 2020

See Hartley v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 276 S.W.2d 1, 3 (Tenn. 1954). … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Opinion No. 73-185 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 1973

In the case of Smith v. … In the body of the opinion in the case of State ex rel Hamilton v.

Wilhelm, Andrea v. Walgreen Co.

2022 TN WC 25 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 16, 2022

Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 803 S.W.2d 672, 677 (Tenn. 1991); see also Smith v. TrustPoint Hosp., LLC, 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Appeals Board addressed this question in Walls v. United Technologies Corp., 2021 TN Wrk Comp App Bd LEXIS 27, at *22, 23 (Aug. 6, 2021).

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1992

WOODY V. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 141 OF POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY, 661 P.2D 892 (OKLA. 1983). WORDS USED IN THE STATUTE, UNLESS OTHERWISE DEFINED, ARE TO BE INTERPRETED IN THEIR ORDINARY SENSE. 25 O.S. 1991 , 1. … BOUTWELL V. STATE, 659 P.2D 322 (OKL. CR. 1983).

In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Jacobs

8 Mills Surr. 299 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1911

In case of Morris v. … . *306 In the case of Brown v. Butchers & Drovers’ Bank, 6 Hill, 443 , a man became charged as an indorser by writing the figures “ 1-2-3 ” on the back of a note.

City of Hackensack v. Hackensack Medical Center

9 N.J. Tax 460 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 6, 1988

Overlook Hospital Ass’n v. Summit, 6 N.J.Tax 90 (Tax Ct.1983), aff’d per curiam 6 N.J.Tax 350 (App.Div.1984); Summit v. … Accordingly, the judgment of the county board is reversed and the original assessment will be restored.

Mays, Timothy v. Matthew Pearson, d/b/a Handyman Construction

2019 TN WC 67 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 26, 2019

See Hackney v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 29, at *8- 9 (July 22, 2016). Because Dr. Youseff has already provided substantial care to Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Pollock v. Waspco Corporation

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 2, 2002

Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co ., 305 N.C. 593 , 290 S.E.2d 682 (1982), Watkins v. Central Motor Lines , 279 N.C. 132 , 181 S.E.2d 588 (1971). 3. … Stat. § 97-25 ; Hyler v.

Mann, Geraldine v. ACA Transport, LLC

2021 TN WC 191 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 21, 2021

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2020); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Ms. … More importantly, the Appeals Board has held that a nurse practitioner’s opinion, standing alone, is not enough to establish causation; a doctor’s expertise is required. Noel v. EAN Holdings, LLC, TN. Wrk. Comp. App.

In re Miller

171 A.3d 367 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2016

OPINION BY JUDGE DAVID BARTON Respondent Kenneth Miller (Respondent Miller), a former Senior Magisterial District Judge, appears before this Court in response to a Complaint filed by the Judicial Conduct Board. … Article V, § 18(a) of the Pennsylvania Constitution grants to the Judicial Conduct Board the authority to determine whether there is probable cause to File formal charges against a judicial officer, in this Court, and thereafter

In re Miller

171 A.3d 367 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2016

OPINION BY JUDGE DAVID BARTON Respondent Kenneth Miller (Respondent Miller), a former Senior Magisterial District Judge, appears before this Court in response to a Complaint filed by the Judicial Conduct Board. … Article V, § 18(a) of the Pennsylvania Constitution grants to the Judicial Conduct Board the authority to determine whether there is probable cause to File formal charges against a judicial officer, in this Court, and thereafter

Jeban Realty Corp. v. State

194 Misc. 492 · New York Court of Claims · Jan 21, 1949

(Hayden v. Pierce, 144 N. Y. 512, 516 .) … Y. 233, 238 ; citing Sexauer & Lemke v. Burke & Sons Co., 228 N. Y. 341, 345 . See, also, Matter of Moore v. Board of Education, Canandaigua, 274 App. Div. 403, 410 .)

McGauvran, James v. ATOS Syntel, Inc.

2021 TN WC App. 66 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 21, 2021

Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., 4 Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Opinion No. 80-031 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 2, 1980

Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners, 468 P.2d 501 , 507 , 508 (Okl. 1970), held: "Counties have only such authority as is granted by statute. Citing cases . . . … The Board of County Commissioners in exercising corporate powers is limited to those fields expressly assigned to such subdivisions of the state by the legislature. Citing cases . . .

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 8, 1979

The State Motorpool is created under the direction of the State Board of Public Affairs by the provisions of 47 O.S. 159 .1 (1971). … See Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal CIT Credit Corp. 301 P.2d 212 (Okla. 1956).