Case law

In re the Account of Proceedings of Tharp

113 Misc. 199 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 15, 1920

Pro. § 2680; Matter of Brown, 60 Misc. Rep. 35 . … Cady v. Bradshaw, 116 N. Y. 188 .

Wiesenfeld v. Director, Division of Taxation

3 N.J. Tax 3 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 26, 1981

The ball returns are made of plastic or metal and are affixed to the building by means of screws in 12"-wide boards. The boards, in turn, are “ram-shot” into the concrete flooring. … Y. v. City of N. Y., supra; San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. San Diego Cty., supra.

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 3, 1995

Ledbetter v. … See City of Duncan v.

De Peyster v. Clarkson

2 Wend. 77 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1828

In 1 Brown’s R. 375, the liability of the' executor to pay interest is placed upon the ground that he had applied the funds to his own use, and had made profits.In the case of Treves v. … The counsel also cited 2 Brown’s R, 430, 2 Cox, 113, S.

Gunnels, Jewell v. Walgreens Co.

2016 TN WC 264 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 7, 2016

See Johnson v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc., No. 2014-06-0069, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 18 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. July 2, 2015); Smith v. The Newman Grp., No. 2015-08-0075, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. … McCaffery v. Cardinal Logistics, No. 2015-08-0218, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 50, at * 10 (Tenn. Workers" Comp. App. Bd. Dec. 10, 2015). See also English v.

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 28, 1996

Baker, 718 P.2d at 351 (prior cases, Board of Trustees v. Burns, 348 P.2d 1067 (Okla. 1959); Board of Trustees v. … Police Pension and Relief Board of Denver v.

Phelps v. Stabilus

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 14, 2010

Stat. § 97-53 (13), Rutledge v. Tultex Corp. , 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983). 2. … Jones v. Beaunit Corp. , 72 N.C. App. 351 , 324 S.E.2d 324 (1985). 5.

Morris v. Southern Surety Co.

29 S.W.2d 1051 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 25, 1930

This exact question, under a state of facts very similar, is involved in the case of Federal Surety Co. v. … Co. v. Salser, 224 S. W. 557 , reached the conclusion that such right does not survive. In view of its opinion in the Salser Case, and also of the opinion in Moore v. Lumbermqn’s Reciprocal Association (Tex. Com.

Princeton Campus Club v. Princeton Borough

4 N.J. Tax 632 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 24, 1982

Each assessment had been appealed to the Mercer County Board of Taxation and each assessment was affirmed by the county board in a separate judgment. … See Pleasantville Taxpayers v. Pleasantville, 115 N.J.Super. 85 , 278 A.2d 229 (App.Div.1971), certif. den. 59 NJ. 268, 281 A.2d 530 (1971).

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 6, 1989

Co. v. … Examples include the State Burial Board, the Board of Registration for Foresters and the Polygraph Examiners Board.

Smith v. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 29, 2007

. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Mason v. N.C. State Hwy. Comm'n , 7 N.C. App. 644 , 173 S.E.2d 515 (1970). 5. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this requirement may be fatal to his tort action at the Industrial Commission. Laughinghouse v.

Philalom, Lynnese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.

2021 TN WC App. 77 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 8, 2021

As explained by the Tennessee Supreme Court in Wilson v. … Sharp v. Tenn. DOC, No. M2016-01207- COA-R3-CV, 2017 Tenn. App. LEXIS 740, at *8 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2017). In Arnold v. City of Chattanooga, 19 S.W.3d 779 (Tenn. Ct.

Frederick v. State

23 Misc. 3d 1008 · New York Court of Claims · Jan 23, 2009

action for the intentional tort of false imprisonment (CPLR 215 [3] [a one-year statute of limitations]), and a constitutional tort for violation of claimant’s rights (CPLR 214 [5] [a three-year statute of limitations]; see Brown … State of New York, 54 AD3d 1117 [3d Dept 2008]; Matter of Brown v State of New York, 52 AD3d 1136 [3d Dept 2008]).

United Ancient Order of Druidsgrove 29 v. Wayne County Property Tax Assessment Bd. of Appeals

867 N.E.2d 296 · Indiana Tax Court · May 17, 2007

867 N.E.2d 296 (2007) United Ancient Order of DruidsGrove #29 v. Wayne County Property Tax Assessment Bd. of Appeals. No. 49T10-0406-TA-25. Tax Court of Indiana. May 17, 2007. … The final determination of the Indiana Board is Affirmed.

Thorpe v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 12, 2011

. § 143-291 (a) (2007) confers upon the North Carolina Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear negligence claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions … See Isenhour v. Hutto , 350 N.C. 601 , 604 , 517 S.E.2d 121 , 124 (1999). 4.

Reeves v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 9, 2011

Under the Tort Claims Act, the General Assembly has conferred upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction over tort claims filed "against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments … The Act is in partial derogation of sovereign immunity, see Stone v. N.C.

Friendsview Manor v. State Tax Commission

2 Or. Tax 130 · Oregon Tax Court · Mar 19, 1965

The Board of Directors, at the start, allocated two of the 125 rooms for charity residents. It was also planned that every 20th room would be set aside on the basis of need. … The Board of Directors receives no compensation and the manager receives a nominal salary.

Bunch v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 16, 2009

Bolkir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2. N.C. Gen. … . § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State.

Regent Care Center, Inc. v. Hackensack City

20 N.J. Tax 181 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 24, 2001

See Corrado [v. Tp. of Montclair, 18 N.J.Tax 20 0 ] supra, at 202, citing [Tp. of West Milford v.] … Following a reassessment of a portion of the taxing district pursuant to an approved compliance plan, the assessor shall certify to the county board of taxation, through such sampling as the county board of taxation deems

Opinion No. 79-035 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 28, 1979

Tate v. … Watson v. Lee, 163 A.L.R. 362, 370 ; Franklin v. Savannah, 199 Ga. 426 , 34 S.E.2d 506 (1945); Hughes v. Traeger, 264 Ill. 612 , 106 N.E. 431 (1914). In Krebs v.