Case law

Engler, Jonathan v. Able Moving Co.

2016 TN WC 190 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 17, 2016

Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 638, 643 (Tenn. 2008) (quoting Orman v. … Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 803 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991).

Holloway, Patricia v. Herbalife International, Inc.

2024 TN WC 14 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 1, 2024

However, the Appeals Board held that this employer-directed provider does not replace a panel or relieve that employer of its obligation to provide a panel of physicians. Hawes v. McLane Co., 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … (citing Young v. Young. Elec. Co., TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *16 (May 25, 2016).

In re Miller

171 A.3d 367 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2016

OPINION BY JUDGE DAVID BARTON Respondent Kenneth Miller (Respondent Miller), a former Senior Magisterial District Judge, appears before this Court in response to a Complaint filed by the Judicial Conduct Board. … Article V, § 18(a) of the Pennsylvania Constitution grants to the Judicial Conduct Board the authority to determine whether there is probable cause to File formal charges against a judicial officer, in this Court, and thereafter

In re Miller

171 A.3d 367 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2016

OPINION BY JUDGE DAVID BARTON Respondent Kenneth Miller (Respondent Miller), a former Senior Magisterial District Judge, appears before this Court in response to a Complaint filed by the Judicial Conduct Board. … Article V, § 18(a) of the Pennsylvania Constitution grants to the Judicial Conduct Board the authority to determine whether there is probable cause to File formal charges against a judicial officer, in this Court, and thereafter

McCool, Martha v. Professional Care Services

2025 TN WC App. 57 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 18, 2025

In Sledge v. … Finally, in Conroy v.

Kutas v. State

135 Misc. 2d 1044 · New York Court of Claims · Jun 9, 1987

However, all aspects of claimant’s would-be contract claim can be presented in an article 78 proceeding (cf., Pauk v Board of Trustees, 111 AD2d 17, 21 , affd 68 NY2d 702 ) and the claimed variances in procedures are not … on the contractual relationship existing between the decedent and the respondent” (Matter of Mudzinski v Board of Estimate, 37 Misc 2d 1044, 1045 ; emphasis added).

Clausen v. Ohio State Univ.

2010 Ohio 3932 · Ohio Court of Claims · Apr 21, 2010

[Cite as Clausen v. Ohio State Univ., 2010-Ohio-3932.] … Clausen is a classified civil service employee the State Personnel Board of Review is the proper jurisdiction for her claim.” See Berry v. Kent State Univ., Ct. of Cl. No. 2003-03388, 2004-Ohio-5915.

McGauvran, James v. ATOS Syntel, Inc.

2021 TN WC App. 66 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 21, 2021

Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., 4 Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Harrison, Elizabeth v. Chattanooga Staffing

2021 TN WC App. 55 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 26, 2021

Godkin delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Timothy W. Conner and Judge David F. Hensley joined. Charles G. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Baccallao, Amalia v. Javier H. Sanabria DBA Cleaning Service

2020 TN WC 105 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 14, 2020

.: 2019-04-0203A Employee, ) 2019-04-0203B v. ) 2019-04-0203C Javier H. … The Workers ' Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Cole v. S R Services

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 12, 1998

Rutledge v. Tultex Corp., 308 N.C. 85 , at 93-94, 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983). … Hansel v. Sherman Textiles, 304 N.C. 44 , 283 S.E.2d 101 (1981). 4.

In re Becker

72 Pa. D. & C.2d 711 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Jan 23, 1976

COHEN, Member, This matter is before the board on the appeal of K. … Loudon Hill Farm, Inc. v. Milk Control Commission, 420 Pa. 548 , 217 A.2d 735 (1966); Committee to Preserve Mill Creek, supra . . .”: 342 A.2d at 475 .

Atlantic City Electric Co. v. Taxation Division Director

5 N.J. Tax 15 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 3, 1982

Power and Light Co. v. … Co. v.

Bauknecht, Bauknecht, v Five Star Quality Care, Inc., d/b/a Morningside Assisted Living

2019 TN WC 40 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 7, 2019

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(l) (2018); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Five Star argued that the proposed surgery is not reasonably necessary. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Holdway, Terri v. Lakeside Behavioral Health Systems

2019 TN WC App. 36 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 15, 2019

On May 2, 2018, Employee was evaluated by a board-certified psychiatrist, Dr. Melvin Goldin. Dr. … Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009).

In re the Accounting of Guaranty Trust Co.

190 Misc. 328 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 9, 1947

(Connor v. New York Life Insurance Co., supra; Matter of Miller, 67 Misc. 660 ; Eagle v. Emmet, 4 Bradf. 117 .) … (Gerry v. Post, 13 How. Prac. 118 ; Oppenheim v. Wolf, 3 Sandf. Ch. 571; Merritt v. Thompson, 1 Hilt. 550 .)

Opinion No. 74-239 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 1974

exercise powers hereunder, five persons shall be appointed as commissioners of the authority (1) in the case of a city, by the mayor with the advice and consent of the governing body, or (2) in the case of a county, by the board … The general rule of statutory construction is cited in Board of Regents for Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges for and on behalf of Murray State College of Agriculture and Applied Science v.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 26, 1994

Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, 674 P.2d 547 (Okla. 1983). … provides that no tax levied and collected for one purpose shall ever be devoted to another purpose. ¶ 6 Inseparability of interest from principal was found to be applicable to municipal sales taxes in the City of Oklahoma City v.

In re the Estate of O'Sullivan

173 Misc. 554 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 11, 1940

This new account was then closed, and its total balance, amounting to $4,492.98, transferred to a new account, numbered 1,191,169, in the sole name of his daughter, Mary Browne, the present respondent. … Y. 177, 180 ; Matter of Greenberg, 158 Misc. 446, 449 ; Matter of Powell, 148 id. 53, 54; Matter of Vaughan, 145 id. 332, 338; Sullivan v. Sullivan, 161 N. Y. 554, 557 .)

Sheehan v. Levy

238 S.W. 900 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 22, 1922

See Electric Express & Baggage Co. v. Ablon, 110 Tex. 235 , 218 S. W. 1030 . … V. Pennsyl *902 vania Co., 54 Fed. 730 , 19 L. R. A. 387.