Case law

Global Textile All., Inc. v. Tdi Worldwide, LLC

2017 NCBC 106 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 21, 2017

Tack is a member of GTA’s Board of Directors. 2. … Timothy remained on GTA’s Board of Directors until on or about September 22, 2016, and Steven remained on GTA’s Board of Directors until on or about August 11, 2017. 18.

In re the Estate of Burrows

139 Misc. 802 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 13, 1931

(Murphy v. Walsh, 113 App. Div. 428 ; Matter of Sutton, 159 id. 21; Crow v. Gleason, 141 N. Y. 489 ; Brooklyn Bank v. Barndby, 197 id. 210.) … (Soper v. Brown, 136 N. Y. 244 ; Matter of Brown, 93 id. 295 ; Scott v. Guernsey, 48 id. 106; Low v. Harmony, 72 id. 408; Matter of Werlich, 230 id. 516, 520; Matter of Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 213 id. 172.)

Opinion No. 72-288 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 1973

Title 74 O.S. 1409 [ 74-1409 ](i) (1971) and Article V, Section 23 of Article 5 of the Oklahoma Constitution require that no legislator may receive, directly or indirectly, any compensation from State appropriated funds other … Settles v. Board of Education, McCurtain County, Oklahoma, Okl., 389 P.2d 356 (1964), and the holdings quoted above were approved by the Court.

People v. Francisco

176 Misc. 2d 288 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Mar 19, 1998

(People v Lassiter, supra, at 294 , citing People v Brown, supra, at 311 ; see also, People v Drake, 205 AD2d 996 [3d Dept 1994].) … People v Lassiter (supra) and People v Brown (supra), however, were decided in the postindictment context, i.e., defense counsel’s failure to appear occurred after the filing of the indictment.

Beard v. Captain D'S of Hickory

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 24, 1996

Brown on this issue that the opinion testimony of Dr. Lorenz and Dr. Dunaway. 9. … G.S. § 97-17 ; Pruitt v. Knight Publishing Company , 289 N.C. 254 (1976). 2.

Primm, Chad v. Central Sales & Service, Inc.

2026 TN WC 89 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 24, 2026

Further, as Central Sales argued, the Appeals Board reduced an award of costs “incurred in the pursuit of permanent total disability benefits,” which claim was unsuccessful. Oldham v. Freeman Webb Co. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Holloway, Patricia v. Herbalife International, Inc.

2024 TN WC 14 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 1, 2024

However, the Appeals Board held that this employer-directed provider does not replace a panel or relieve that employer of its obligation to provide a panel of physicians. Hawes v. McLane Co., 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … (citing Young v. Young. Elec. Co., TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *16 (May 25, 2016).

Headen v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 14, 2011

. § 143-291 (a) confers upon the North Carolina Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear negligence claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … See Isenhour v. Hutto , 350 N.C. 601 , 604 , 517 S.E.2d 121 , 124 (1999). 5.

Cucinotta v. Saljon Enterprises, Ltd.

140 Misc. 2d 681 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Aug 10, 1988

It is, however, at most an amendable irregularity which may be disregarded (Berkley Assocs. v Jordan, NYLJ, Feb. 1, 1980, at 5, col 1 [App Term, 1st Dept]; City of New York v Brown, 119 Misc 2d 1054 ). … To the extent that S.P.S.G., Inc. v Collado ( 113 Misc 2d 167 ) is to the contrary, I decline to follow it.

Cole v. S R Services

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 12, 1998

Rutledge v. Tultex Corp., 308 N.C. 85 , at 93-94, 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983). … Hansel v. Sherman Textiles, 304 N.C. 44 , 283 S.E.2d 101 (1981). 4.

Willett's Estate

2 N.Y.S. 665 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 14, 1888

Sur. 141 ; Laytin v. Davidson, 95 N. Y. 263 ; Estate of Mason, 98 N. Y. 527 ,) but not on the full amount. … Hill v. Nelson, 1 Dem. Sur. 357 ; In re Harris, 4 Dem. Sur. 463 .

Kutas v. State

135 Misc. 2d 1044 · New York Court of Claims · Jun 9, 1987

However, all aspects of claimant’s would-be contract claim can be presented in an article 78 proceeding (cf., Pauk v Board of Trustees, 111 AD2d 17, 21 , affd 68 NY2d 702 ) and the claimed variances in procedures are not … on the contractual relationship existing between the decedent and the respondent” (Matter of Mudzinski v Board of Estimate, 37 Misc 2d 1044, 1045 ; emphasis added).

Atlantic City Electric Co. v. Taxation Division Director

5 N.J. Tax 15 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 3, 1982

Power and Light Co. v. … Co. v.

Kent, Robert v. Delatorre Art Design, Inc.

2019 TN WC App. 51 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 4, 2019

See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013). … See Wright v.

Bauknecht, Bauknecht, v Five Star Quality Care, Inc., d/b/a Morningside Assisted Living

2019 TN WC 40 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 7, 2019

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(l) (2018); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Five Star argued that the proposed surgery is not reasonably necessary. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

In re Miami Christian School, Inc.

15 Fla. Supp. 2d 171 · Dade County Property Appraisal Adjustment Board · Mar 31, 1985

Thus, in Lummus v. … The undersigned is mindful of the general principle that determinations made by the Property Appraiser come to the Property Appraisal Adjustment Board with the presumption of correctness. Markham v.

Holdway, Terri v. Lakeside Behavioral Health Systems

2019 TN WC App. 36 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 15, 2019

On May 2, 2018, Employee was evaluated by a board-certified psychiatrist, Dr. Melvin Goldin. Dr. … Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009).

Opinion No. 74-239 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 1974

exercise powers hereunder, five persons shall be appointed as commissioners of the authority (1) in the case of a city, by the mayor with the advice and consent of the governing body, or (2) in the case of a county, by the board … The general rule of statutory construction is cited in Board of Regents for Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges for and on behalf of Murray State College of Agriculture and Applied Science v.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 26, 1994

Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, 674 P.2d 547 (Okla. 1983). … provides that no tax levied and collected for one purpose shall ever be devoted to another purpose. ¶ 6 Inseparability of interest from principal was found to be applicable to municipal sales taxes in the City of Oklahoma City v.

In re the Estate of Fontheim

171 Misc. 24 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 11, 1939

Her application is still pending and no award has as yet been made by the State Industrial Board on the compensation claims. … In Surace v. Danna ( 248 N.