Case law

Opinion No. (2008)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 11, 2008

Tax Comm'n v. Fortinberry Co. , 207 P.2d 301 , 304 (Okla. 1949) (citation omitted). ¶ 11 The implied powers doctrine was also utilized in Board of Examiners v. Tubbs , 307 P.2d 830 , 831-32 (Okla. 1957). … County Excise Bd. v. Kurn , 115 P.2d 113 , 115 (Okla. 1941 ), Okla. Tax Comm'n v. Fortinberry Co. , 207 P.2d 301 , 304 (Okla. 1949 ), Bd. of Exam'rs v. Tubbs , 307 P.2d 830 , 831-32 (Okla. 1957). 3.

People of Faith v. Dept. of Revenue

161 Ariz. 514 · Arizona Tax Court · Sep 1, 1989

Bank of America v. State Board of Equalization, 209 Cal. App.2d 780 , 26 Cal. Rptr. 348 (1962); Southwestern Bell Telephone v. State Commission of Revenue, 168 Kan. 227 , 212 P.2d 363 (1949); Brandtjen & Kluge v. … Brown v. White, 2 Ariz. App. 295 , 408 P.2d 228 (1965); Beach v. Superior Court, 64 Ariz. 375 , 173 P.2d 79 (1946). The bill which amended the exemption statute was Senate Bill 1103. 1981 Ariz. Sess. Laws 301 .

Billings v. Stewart

4 Dem. Sur. 265 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1885

The petitioner insists that even such expenses should be held subordinate to his claim, and in support of his contention cites Storm v. Waddell (2 Sandf. Ch., 494); Edmonston v. McLoud( 16 N. Y., 543 ); Brown v. … It was said by Earl, J., in Brown v.

Hollar v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.

2011 Ohio 6986 · Ohio Court of Claims · Sep 28, 2011

[Cite as Hollar v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 2011-Ohio-6986.] … See Sandu v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., Ct. of Cl. No. 2008-02606-AD, 2008-Ohio-6858.

Township of New Providence v. Lions Club

19 N.J. Misc. 103 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 21, 1941

It was so held in Plainfield Lions Club v. Township of New Providence, New Jersey Tax Reports 1912-1934, p. 453. … A. of Garfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1936), 14 N. J. Mis. R. 831; 186 Atl. Rep. 702 ; City of Trenton v. Trenton Masonic Temple Association (Supreme Court, 1930), 8 N. J. Mis. R. 778; 151 Atl.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 4, 1963

WHICH HE IS A MEMBER, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR HOW HE VOTED THEREON. (3) NO MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE MAY RECEIVE COMPENSATION OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND OF ANY SCHOOL DISTRICT TO WHICH THERE HAS BEEN APPORTIONED BY THE STATE BOARD … CITE: 70 O.S. 1961 , 4-30 [70-4-30], ARTICLE V, SECTION 24, 70 O.S. 1961 , 18-4(1)(C) [70-18-4], 70 O.S. 1961 , 18-4 [70-18-4], 70 O.S. 1961 , 18-1 [70-18-1], 70 O.S. 1961 , 18-4(2) [70-18-4], 70 O.S. 1961 , 18-2 [70-18-2

Appeal of City of Jersey City v. Maritime Petroleum Corp.

25 N.J. Misc. 81 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 12, 1946

Frigidaire Corp. v. City of Newark (State Board, filed February 23d, 1937); Ballmill Lumber and Sales Corp. v. City of Newark (State Board, filed May 29th, 1939).; Continental Purchasing Co., Inc., v. … It will be seen that no method of averaging is found in the statute but it has been held in General Motors Corp. v. State Board, 125 N. J. L. 574; 16 Atl.

Deaguila, Enrique v. Pods Enterprises, LLC

2021 TN WC 249 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 8, 2021

Travis v. Carter Express, Inc., 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 25, at *14 (June 24, 2019); see also Thompson v. Comcast Corp., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *28-9 (Jan. 30, 2018). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

West Ridgelawn Cemetery v. City of Clifton

20 N.J. Misc. 399 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 19, 1942

The proofs made before us in the 1938 case are fully detailed in the opinion of the board. West Ridgelawn Cemetery v. City of Clifton, New Jersey Tax Reports, 1934-1939, p. 775. … It was therefore held, under the authority of Mausoleum Builders of New Jersey v. State Board, 88 N. J. L. 592; 96 Atl. Rep. 494 (Supreme Court, 1916); affirmed, 90 N. J. L. 163; 100 Atl.

BAIRD, BONNIE v. TARGET CORP

2026 TN WC 63 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 7, 2026

In Dennis v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Bailey

8 Wend. 339 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1831

In Brinkerhoof v. Brown, 4 Johns. Ch. … And in Brinkerhoof v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. R. 139, it was held, that different judgment creditors may unite in one bill for discovery and account, to remove impediments at law created by the fraud of their common debtor.

Kalofonos v. State

115 Misc. 2d 692 · New York Court of Claims · Sep 20, 1982

The planks were actually ladders covered over longitudinally with boards. … The board may make rules to carry into effect the provisions of this section.”

Rt. 88 Office Assoc. Ltd. v. Township of Brick

13 N.J. Tax 14 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 7, 1992

Rutherford Board of Education, 90 N.J. 63, 74 , 447 A.2d 140 (1982). … Schneider v. City of East Orange, supra, dealt with the time for payment of taxes on an appeal to the Tax Court from a judgment of a county board of taxation.

Reilly v. Labovsky

120 Misc. 2d 478 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Aug 3, 1983

(See, e.g., Kamm v Drake, 117 Misc 2d 658 ; Kamm v Cotton, NYLJ March 30, 1983, p 13, col 4; Bauer v Zafirau, NYLJ, April 26, 1983, p 12, col 1.) … The Conciliation and Appeals Board has followed the court’s interpretation. (Gambe v Marx [opn No. 26,385], “the owner may no longer refuse a renewal lease for the owner’s own use and occupancy”.)

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 21, 1998

LeForce v. Bullard, 454 P.2d 297 (Okla. 1969). … If the taxpayer wishes to appeal the assessor's determination, the taxpayer may file an appeal with the county board of equalization. ¶ 12 For those taxpayers having property assessed by the State Board of Equalization, the

Arriaga, Elsa v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.

2016 TN WC App. 11 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 9, 2016

Simpson v. Frontier Cmty. Credit Union, 810 S.W.2d 147, 153 (Tenn. 1991). … Lawrence v. Stanford, 655 S.W.2d 927, 929 (Tenn. 1983). Indeed, in most instances, an issue raised for the first time on appeal will be deemed waived. See, e.g., Norton v.

In re Brooks' Will

120 N.Y.S. 596 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 31, 1909

In Tyler v. Gardiner, 35 N. … Forman v. Smith, 7 Lans. 443, 449 . In Swenarton v. Hancock, 9 Abb. N.

Early v. Early

5 Redf. 376 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1882

In Doe v. … In Brown v.

Camacho, Yolanda v. Ricardo Allen, d/b/a Southern Standard Logistics, LLC

2021 TN WC 251 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 8, 2021

See, e.g., Ducros v. Metro Roofing and Metal Supply Co., Inc., TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

In re the Estate of Klein

39 Misc. 2d 960 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 10, 1963

The court therefore directs that the bequest made in Item IV, paragraph (p) be paid to the women’s board of the Home and Hospital of the Daughters of Israel. (St. Luke’s Home v. Assn. for Indigent Females, 52 N. … Y. 191 ; Le Fevre v. Le Fevre, 59 N. Y. 434 ; Matter of Hodges, 26 Misc 2d 771 .)