Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.57s

  • German Apostolic Christian Church v. Department of Revenue

    6 Or. Tax 521 · Oregon Tax Court · Sep 28, 1976

    See YMCA v. Dept. of Rev., 268 Or 633 , 522 P2d 464 (1974) ; Benevolent Society v. … In Benevolent Society v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mays v. First State Bank of Keller

    247 S.W. 845 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 14, 1923

    other officer or board everything the first knew about it. … To the same effect are First National Bank v. Dunbar, 118 Ill. 625 , 9 N. E. 186 ; Holden v. New York & E. Bank, 72 N. Y. 286 ; Commercial Bank v. Tatum, 193 Ala. 120 , 69 South. 508 ; Pensacola Bank v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Sloat

    141 Misc. 710 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 2, 1931

    (Harris v. American Bible Society, 2 Abb. Ct. of App. Dec. 316, 322; Robb v. Washington & Jefferson College, 185 N. Y. 485, 489 ; Amherst College v. Ritch, 151 id. 282, 335; Decker v. … (Hobson v. Hale, 95 N. Y. 588 ; Scholle v. Scholle , 113 id. 261 .)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-207 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 13, 1972

    McVicker v. Board of Commissioners of Caddo County, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 , 302 (1968). … Trask v. Johnson, Okl., 452 P.2d 575 , 577 (1969).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Hurlbut

    5 Mills Surr. 464 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1906

    Amory v. Lord, 9 N. Y. 403 ; Woodruff v. Cook, 61 id. 638, 641; Bailey v. Bailey, 97 id. 460; La Farge v. Brown, 31 App. Div. 542, 545 . … Bowditch v. Ayrault, 138 N. Y. 222, 231 ; Matter of Hoyt, 160; id. 607, 618; Matter of Perkins, 75 Hun, 129 ; affd. on opinion *467 below, 145 N. Y. 599 ; Frethey v. Durant, 24 App. Div. 58 ; Matter of Hunt, 41 Misc.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2002)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 10, 2002

    See, e.g., 67 O.S. 2001 , § 203[ 67-203 ] (d) (defining "agency" as "any department, office, commission, board, authority or other unit, however designated, of the state government." … Osprey L.L.C. v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co., 984 P.2d 194 , 199 (Okla. 1999).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of East Orange v. Joshua Hendy Iron Works

    24 N.J. Misc. 82 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 12, 1946

    Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. et al. v. City of Gloucester, New Jersey Tax Reports, 1912-1934, p. 266. … Howard Savings Institution v. Newark, 63 N. J. L. 547; 44 Atl. Rep. 654 . The action of the Essex County Board of Taxation is affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Med1 Nc Servs., LLC v. Med1 Plus, LLC

    2021 NCBC 38 · North Carolina Business Court · Jun 24, 2021

    The Robeson County Board of Commissioners (“Board of Commissioners”) decides to which provider the contract (the “Robeson County Contract”) will be awarded in their sole discretion. … (June 17, 2019 Board of Commissioner’s Minutes, ECF No. 53.11.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cauble v. Soft-Play Inc.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 26, 1995

    Death Certificate of Jimmy Brown Staton. 4. Death Certificate of Jamey Staton. 5. Marriage License of Jimmy Brown Staton and Venita Elaine Franklin Gilmore. 6. … Murray v. Associated Insurers, Inc. , 114 N.C. App. 506 , 442 S.E.2d 370 (1994), cert. denied , 338 N.C. 519 (1995); Martin v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. , 5 N.C. App. 37 , 167 S.E.2d 790 (1969). 3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 69-308 (1996) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 10, 1969

    Smith v. State Board of Education, 190 Okl. 556 , 126 P.2d 241 (1942). Furthermore, ". . . the tax exemption statute is to be strictly construed against the exemption." Board of Equalization of Oklahoma County v. … Also, in Board of Commissioners v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cohn v. Livingston Township

    18 N.J. Tax 429 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 6, 1999

    In Pennwalt Corp. v. … The judgment of the Essex County Board of Taxation ($83,000) is not a consideration in this court’s determination. Piscataway Assoc. Inc. v. Piscataway Tp., 73 N.J. 546 , 376 A.2d 527 (1977); Feder v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kazanchy v. Borough of Sea Bright

    6 N.J. Tax 353 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 4, 1983

    In Murnick v. … Riverview Gardens v. North Arlington, supra; Glenwood Realty Co., Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re the Accounting of Fusco

    28 Misc. 2d 1010 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 27, 1961

    Brown, Justice of the Supreme Court and Acting Surrogate. … There was an ademption and the specific devisees consequently receive neither the property nor its proceeds (Ametrano v. Downs, 170 N. Y. 388 ; Matter of Brann, 219 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kumbalek v. Multnomah County Assessor

    Oregon Tax Court · Sep 5, 2013

    Jeff Brown (Brown), Residential Appeals Lead Appriser, testified on behalf of Defendant. Plaintiff‟s Exhibits 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7 were offered and admitted. I. … Brown testified that the original listing price was $589,000 “one year prior to the assessment date.”

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In re the Estate of Schlossman

    136 Misc. 893 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 5, 1930

    (Kings County Trust Co. v. Hyams, 242 N. Y. 405, 412 ; Nay v. Curley, 113 id. 575, 578; Clark v. Dada, 183 App. Div. 253, 263 ; Cole v. Sweet, 187 N. Y. 488 ; Merritt v. Campbell, 79 id. 625 .) … (Matter of Brown, 252 N. Y. 366 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pennwalt Corp. v. Township of Holmdel

    4 N.J. Tax 51 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 13, 1982

    In an appeal to the Tax Court, there is a presumption that the county board judgment is correct. Riverview Gardens v. North Arlington, 9 N.J. 167 , 87 A.2d 425 (1952); Glenwood Realty Co., Inc. v. … Samuel Hird & Sons, Inc. v. Garfield, supra; Almax Builders, Inc. v. Perth Amboy, 1 N.J.Tax 31 (Tax Ct. 1980); Newark v. 1013 Corp., 1 N.J.Tax 107 (Tax Ct. 1980).

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

    2020 Ohio 478 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jan 27, 2020

    On June 13, 2018, NCI’s Rules Infraction Board (Board) found plaintiff guilty of violating ODRC Rule 40. (McGilton Aff. ¶ 6.) … The Board found plaintiff guilty of violating ODRC Rule 40. Id., at ¶ 52. Plaintiff appealed the Board’s decision, but his appeal was denied. Id., at ¶ 53.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Merchandise Mart Associates v. Pennsauken Township

    3 N.J. Tax 275 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 28, 1981

    Crewe Corp. v. Feiler, 28 N.J. 316, 320 [ 146 A.2d 458 ] (1958); Becker v. Little Ferry, supra, 126 N.J.L. 338 . … In Stack v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Crawford, Elsie v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

    2021 TN WC App. 60 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 18, 2021

    See Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015). … Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 264-65 (Tenn. 2015).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Osborne, Alonzo, Jr. v. Beacon Transport, LLC

    2016 TN WC App. 49 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 27, 2016

    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Alonzo Osborne, Jr. ) Docket No. 2015-05-0652 ) v. … Phillips v. A & H Constr. Co., 134 S.W.3d 145, 148 (Tenn. 2004).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.