Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.14s
654 A.2d 676 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 1994
filed July 11, 1994, by the Judicial Conduct Board. … The Judicial Conduct Board (the Board) has filed a Petition to Implement Automatic Forfeiture of Judicial Office. The Board requests this Court to declare that District *677 Justice Raymond L. Gentile, Jr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYates v. N.C. Department of Transportation
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 29, 2011
. § 143-291 (a) confers upon the North Carolina Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear negligence claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … See Isenhour v. Hutto , 350 N.C. 601 , 604 , 517 S.E.2d 121 , 124 (1999). 4.
Cited 0 timesPublished155 Misc. 311 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 22, 1935
Devine Co., supra; McCullough v. Auditors, 216 App. Div. 510 [2d Dept.]; Mayer v. New York Canners, Inc., 217 id. 202; Cramatan National Bank & Trust Co. v. … Campbell, individually, and United States Shipping Board, by William E. Collins or other officer or managing agent.
Cited 2 timesPublishedHairston v. N.C. Dept. of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 23, 2007
Bolkir v. N.C. State University, 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2. N.C. Gen. … . § 143-291 (a) confers upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 19, 1969
In Town of Chouteau v. … And in Lutes v. Thompson, 193 Okl. 331 , 143 P.2d 135 (1943), the same court said: "Construction and maintenance of county highways fall within the statutory duties of county commissioners.
Cited 0 timesPublished273 S.W. 838 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 27, 1925
Co. v. Smith (Tex. Sup.) 14 S. … McGowen v. McGowen, 52 Tex. 665 ; T. & P. Ry. Co. v. Robertson, 82 Tex. 660 , 17 S. W. 1041 , 27 Am. St. Rep. 929 ; T. & P. Ry. Co. v. Hall, 83 Tex. 682 , 19 S. W. 121 .
Cited 23 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 26, 1990
V. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF TULSA, 468 P.2D 501 (OKLA. 1970). SEVERAL MUNICIPALITIES MEET THE CRITERIA FOR THE QUALIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS AND MANY MUNICIPALITIES DO NOT. … MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF RETIREMENT V. MURGIA, 427 U.S. 307 , 96 S.CT. 2562 , 49 L.ED.2D 520 (1976).
Cited 0 timesPublished458 A.2d 707 · Delaware Family Court · May 21, 1982
On or about April 1,1982, the Industrial Accident Board (hereinafter called “Board”) commuted the loss of use payments to 19 Del.C. § 2358 in the amount of approximately $28,000. … Compensation for a husband’s personal injuries, which were received after the filing for the divorce were found to belong to him as personal property in Jurek v. Jurek, Ariz.Supr., 124 Ariz. 596 , 606 P.2d 812 (1980).
Cited 18 timesPublishedIn re the Accounting of Solomon
18 Misc. 2d 984 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 20, 1959
Co. v. Pink, 276 N. Y. 421, 426 .)” The court went on to say that in collecting a sales tax, the city acts as an agent of the State. Matter of Brown Print. Co. ( 285 N.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJohnson v. N.C. Dept. of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 5, 2010
*Page 8 In Gregory v. W.A. … Gregory v. W.A. Brown Sons , 363 N.C. 750 , 763-764 , 688 S.E.2d 431 (2010). In Booker v. Duke Medical Center , the Supreme Court stated that the purpose of the notice-of-injury requirement contained in N.C. Gen.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKirk, Regina v. Amazon.com, Inc.
2015 TN WC App. 22 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 7, 2015
Manor, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Health & Env't, 849 S.W.2d 755, 759 (Tenn. 1993) (quoting Southern Ry. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196, 199 {Tenn. 1984)). … Serv., Inc. v. Rodell, 42 S.W.3d 846, 865 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas & N. O. Ry. Co. v. Stevens
24 S.W.2d 9 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 12, 1930
Co. v. Syfan, 91 Tex. 562 , 44 S. W. 1064 ; Wilson v. Freeman, 108 Tex. 121 , 185 S. W. 993 , Ann. Cas. 1918D, 1203; Emberlin v. Ry. Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 284 S. W. 539 ; Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. Mann, 130 U. … However, in the Syfan Case the Supreme Court, in a very exhaustive opinion by Justice Brown, reviewed at great length the authorities on this question, and finally upheld the constitutionality of the act, and the power and
Cited 10 timesPublishedCity of Jersey City v. Wright JC Suites LLC
New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 23, 2025
Co. v. Newark, 10 N.J. 99, 105 (1952)). … See Brown v. Borough of Glen Rock, 19 N.J. Tax 366, 377 (App.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJohnston, Johnny v. Siskin Steel & Supply Co./Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
2020 TN WC App. 23 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 8, 2020
See State v. Ostein, 293 S.W.3d 519, 526 (Tenn. 2009); Konvalinka v. Chattanooga-Hamilton Cnty. Hosp. Auth., 249 S.W.3d 348, 358 (Tenn. 2008); Doe 1 ex rel. Doe 1 v. … See, e.g., Richardson v. Board of Dentistry, 913 S.W.2d 446, 454 (Tenn.1995).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 25, 2010
Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2. … Hairston v. Alexander Tank Equip. Co. , 310 N.C. 227 , 232 , 311 S.E.2d 559 , 564 (1984). 3.
Cited 0 timesPublished146 Misc. 17 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 29, 1932
(Kain v. Larkin, 131 N. Y. 300, 307 ; Phillips v. Wooster, 36 id. 412, 414 ; Curtis v. Fox, 47 id. 299, 301; Dunlap v. Hawkins, 59 id. 342, 346, 347, and other authorities too numerous to mention.) … (Patterson v. Patterson, 59 N. Y. 574 , 583 ; Watkins v. Brown, 89 App. Div. 193, 194 ; McCue v. Garvey 14 Hun, 562 -564; Freeman v. Coit, 27 id. 447, 450.)
Cited 9 timesPublished166 Misc. 931 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 16, 1938
An application form was given her which she duly completed and transmitted to the board of managers of the home a week later. … The decedent’s application was accepted after mature consideration by a unanimous vote of the board of managers.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOliver v. N.C. Department of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 9, 2011
Under the Tort Claims Act, the General Assembly has conferred upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction over tort claims filed "against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments … The Act is in partial derogation of sovereign immunity, see *Page 3 Stone v. N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublished42 Misc. 2d 8 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Feb 19, 1964
Elizabeth Brown. *9 Heretofore the court, on tenant’s traverse of service of process, had a hearing before Judge Blattgiabdo on January 31, 1964. … Garage v. Pantex Mills, 274 App. Div. 617 ; O’Toole v. Remy, Inc., 194 Misc. 799 .)
Cited 6 timesPublished41 S.W.2d 57 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jul 22, 1931
Brown v. Ackerman (Tex. Com. App.) 17 S.W.(2d) 771 . In this connection, we quote the following from Judge Gaines’ opinion in White v. McGregor, supra. … v.
Cited 27 timesPublished
Ask Donna