Case law

Opinion No. 73-101 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 30, 1973

(Emphasis added) In Board of County Commissioners v. … (Emphasis added) In Sheldon v.

New Jersey Manufacturers Casualty Insurance v. City of Trenton

20 N.J. Misc. 331 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 30, 1942

Fidelity Trust Co. v. Board of Equalization (Supreme Court, 1908), 77 N. J. L. 128; 71 Atl. Rep. 61 . … See, also, Newark Fire Insurance Co. v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1937), 118 N. J. L. 525; 193 Atl. Rep. 912 ; Universal Insurance Co. v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1937), 118 N. J. L. 538; 193 Atl.

Belmont v. Wayne Township

5 N.J. Tax 110 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 4, 1983

City of Newark v. … Compare Sirota v.

Clark, Stanley v. Calvin Hinton

2022 TN WC App. 37 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 3, 2022

See Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015). … Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

Smith v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 17, 2011

Bolkhir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 3. … Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 4.

Thompson, Gary v. MESA INTERIOR CONST. CO., INC.

2016 TN WC 240 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 14, 2016

McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015). … Furthermore, the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board has determined that an employee has no right to a panel of physicians solely for evaluation purposes. See also Coolidge v.

Williams v. State

77 Misc. 2d 396 · New York Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1974

(Barski v. State of New York, 43 A D 2d 767; Matter of Kohnberg v. Murdock, 4 A D 2d 750; Matter of Lake Mahopac Hgts. *399 v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 278 App. Div. 779 ; Chalmers & Son v. … (Matter of Smith v. Board of Standards & Appeals, supra; People ex rel. Denney v. Clark, 257 App. Div. 905 ; Court of Claims Act, § 9, subd. 8; CPLR 2001.)

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 16, 1989

THE COURT CITED AND FOLLOWED THE CASE OF DERIEG V. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 216 P.2D 307 (OKLA. 1950). … REMY V. AGAR, 559 PP.2D 1235 (OKLA. 1977). THE LAW MAKES A DISTINCTION BETWEEN PROPERTY HELD BY THE MUNICIPALITY FOR ITS USE AS AN ENTITY AND PROPERTY HELD FOR PUBLIC USE.

Taylor v. Taylor

3 Bradf. 54 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1854

Whittaker, 4 Brown’s C. C. 31. 1 Sugden, V. and P., p. 180, 9th ed.)

Willingboro Chrysler/Plymouth, Inc. v. Edgewater Park Township

6 N.J. Tax 168 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 14, 1983

Riverview Gardens v. N. Arlington Borough, 9 N.J. 167, 174-175 , 87 A.2d 425 (1952). A similar presumption attaches to the judgment of the county board on further appeal to the Tax Court. Rodwood Gardens, Inc. v. … Where the municipality seeks to increase the assessment entered by the county board, it has the burden of ultimate persuasion to upset the county board’s judgment. Passaic v.

KSS Transportation Corp. v. Baldwin

9 N.J. Tax 273 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 21, 1987

Board of National Missions v. Neeld, 9 N.J. 349, 353 , 88 A.2d 500 (1952); Phelps Dodge Indus. v. Taxation Div. Director, 8 N.J.Tax 354, 358 (Tax Ct.1986). … My conclusion is supported by the case of Pacific Southwest Airlines v. State Board of Equalization, 140 Cal.Rptr. 543 , 73 Cal.App.3d 32 (App.Div.1977).

In re the Estate of Chafee

122 Misc. 768 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1924

Rep. 66 ; Markey v. Brewster, 10 Hun, 16 ; affd., 70 N. Y. 607 ; Wilsey v. Franklin, 57 Hun, 382 . … Shafer v. Pratt, 79 App. Div. 447 , cited as distinguishing from Davis v.

Im re the Estate of Carson

58 Misc. 2d 819 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 8, 1968

Y. 384 ; United States Trust Co. v. Hogencamp, 191 N. Y, 281). … Since, however, she is also named, as the sole trustee, a legal, and thus alienable, life estate, rather than a valid trust was created (Matter of Reed v. Browne, 295 N.

In re the Estate of Hoole

156 Misc. 821 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 9, 1935

(Flynn v. McDermott, 183 N. Y. 62, 67 ; Sterritt v. Lee, 44 App. Div. 619, 620 ; Berkeley v. Kennedy, 62 id. 609; Walter v. Walter, 60 Misc. 383, 393 ; affd., 133 App. Div. 893 ; affd., 197 N. Y. 606 ; Palmer v. … Green, 63 Hun, 6, 7 ; Matter of Brown, 135 Misc. 611, 614 .) *823 Since by reason of the manner of determination of the first question, the second has become academic, it will not be decided. (Matter of Mount, 185 N.

Lee, Dana v. Journeypure Holdings,Inc.

2021 TN WC 171 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 8, 2021

Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). As noted above, Ms. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Dittman v. Cornelius

234 S.W. 880 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 30, 1921

Tarbox, 27 Tex. 145 ; McRee v. Brown, 45 Tex. 506 ; Shields v. Hunt, 45 Tex. 424 .” In the case of Robertson v. Du Bose, 76 Tex. 1 , 13 S. W. 300 , Judge Henry holds: “In the case of Chamblee v. … Still further, the rule is splendidly stated by Judge Brown in the case of Jester v. Steiner, 86 Tex. 415 , 25 S.

Robinson v. N.C. D.O.C.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 29, 2005

. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkir v. N.C. State University, 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 3.

Dunbar Associates v. Mulzac

93 Misc. 2d 870 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Mar 15, 1978

(Tonetti v Penati, 48 AD2d 25 ; Amanuensis Ltd. v Brown, 65 Misc 2d 15 .) Prior to the decision in Amanuensis Ltd. v Brown (supra) a claim based on an implied warranty of habitability would not have been actionable. … (Klipack v Raymar Novelties, 273 App Div 54 .)

Newton v. Ranger Transportation, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 22, 1999

. § 97-2 (2); Brown v. Truck Lines , 227 N.C. 299 , 42 S.E.2d 71 (1947). 2. … Stat. § 97-2 (2); Hoffman v. Truck Lines, Inc. , 306 N.C. 502 , 293 S.E.2d 807 (1982); Brown v. Truck Lines , 227 N.C. 299 , 42 S.E.2d 71 (1947); Smith v. Central Transport , 51 N.C. App. 316 , 276 S.E.2d 751 (1981). 4.

Soule v. Corning

4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 76 · Saratoga Chancery Court · Jan 27, 1845

In Tillotson v. Ganson ( 1 Verm. Rep. 103,) an order that the complainant should elect was discharged as irregular, because it was obtained before the defendant had answered. And in Brown v. Poyntz (3 Mad. … And in Fish er v. Mec, (3 Mer.