Case law

Ragone v. State

123 Misc. 48 · New York Court of Claims · Mar 29, 1924

(Kerrigan v. Hart, 40 Hun, *52 390 , 391; Williams Case, supra; Ryan v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 35 N. Y. 210 ; Lowery v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 99 id. 158; Pollett v. Long, 56- id. 200; Hofnagle v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. … The case of Smith v. State, 227 N.

Beeler, Bert v. Eric Corum d/b/a Gable to Stable Construction

2020 TN WC 15 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 31, 2020

See Ducros v. Metro Roofing and Metal Supply Co., Inc., TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … See Young v. Young Elec., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *16 (May 25, 2016). Concerning temporary disability benefits, Mr.

Dworkin v. Duncan

116 Misc. 2d 853 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Nov 15, 1982

(See, e.g., Matter of Nostra Realty Corp. v Joy, NYLJ, Jan. 16, 1981, p 4, col 1.) … The latter has referred it to the Loft Board with a letter indicating that if the building is covered by the new law, the Loft Board and possibly the court will ultimately determine issues of coverage and compliance under

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 1976

in which such child resides, under rules and regulations approved by the State Board of Education; provided, however, that the eligibility of exceptional children shall be reevaluated at least once every three (3) years. … In this regard see Sebring v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 401 P.2d 479 , and other cases cited at 13 Okla. Digest, page 503, et seq.

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 2002

Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 946 P.2d 1140 , 1143 (Okla. 1997). For an expenditure to be for a public purpose it must benefit the public, as opposed to special interests or persons, and consideration must be given. … Burkhardt v. City of Enid, 771 P.2d 608 , 611 (Okla. 1989) (quoting Bd. of County Comm's v. Shaw, 182 P.2d 507 , 515 (Okla. 1947)).

Thompson, David v. Comcast Corporation

2018 TN WC App. 1 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 30, 2018

Brown v. Erachem Comilog, Inc., 231 S.W.3d 918, 921 (Tenn. 2007) (internal citation omitted). … The Appeals Board has consistently described this burden of proof as a “lesser evidentiary standard” than the preponderance of the evidence. Helgerson v. Packer Sanitation Servs., Inc., No. 2014-03-0023, 2015 TN Wrk.

In re the Estate of Herman

43 Misc. 2d 309 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 25, 1964

Brown, J. and Acting Surrogate. … Hochstadt, 23 Misc 2d 803 ; Truesell v. Kostiw, 35 Misc 2d 60 ). As mentioned in Jacobs v.

Taylor v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.

2011 Ohio 5726 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jul 21, 2011

[Cite as Taylor v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 2011-Ohio-5726.] … See Sandu v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., Ct. of Cl. No. 2008-02606-AD, 2008- Ohio-6858, Gerzina v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., Ct. of Cl. No. 2010-09809-AD, 2011-Ohio- 1952.

In re the Estate of Berman

33 Misc. 2d 1038 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 16, 1962

The widow therefore has a legal life estate in one half of the residuary and is entitled to the income earned thereon (Matter of Reed v. Browne, 295 N.

In re Zupsic

893 A.2d 900 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 2006

See, Matter of Glancey, 518 Pa. 276 , 542 A.2d 1350 (1988); Judicial Inquiry and Review Board v. Snyder, 514 Pa. 142 , 523 A.2d 294 (1987). … In Disciplinary Counsel v.

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 21, 2000

The Oklahoma State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners' Rule, OAC 775:10-5-30 (f)(3) (2000) set forth above, is a clear prohibition on such practice. … "Rules and regulations enacted by administrative agencies and boards pursuant to the powers delegated to them have the force and effect of law." Cox v.

Dubrow v. Briansky Saratoga Ballet Center, Inc.

68 Misc. 2d 530 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 27, 1971

See, also, Lacy v. Getman ( 119 N. Y. 109 ); Spalding v. Rosa ( 71 N. Y. 40 ). … In this respect the case differs from William v. Stein ( 100 Misc. 677 ) and Drucker v.

Hawes, James v. McLane Company, Inc.

2021 TN WC App. 72 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 25, 2021

Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, a trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence is reviewed do novo with no presumption of correctness. Goodman v. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Matrix Bordentown, Lot 2, LLC v. Director, Division of Taxation

New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 25, 2025

In Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. … Ridgewood Commons Group v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 25 N.J. Tax 188, 195 (Tax 2009). In Metromedia, Inc. v.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 2005

. ¶ 4 Your question relates to the portion of the Act governing funding by state agencies, departments, boards, councils and commissions, referred to collectively herein as governmental entities. … Brigance v. Velvet Dove Rest., 756 P.2d 1232 , 1235 (Okla. 1988). "[R]ules of statutory construction are not applied where the Legislature plainly expresses its intent." Id.

Jones v. Office of the Sheriff

31 Fla. Supp. 2d 134 · Jacksonville Civil Service Board · Apr 11, 1988

Pasco County School Bd. v Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, 353 So.2d 108, 120 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Spicer v Metropolitan Dade County, 458 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Adams v School Bd. of Brevard County, 470 … the Boards’ decision.

City of Newark v. New Jersey Investment Co.

18 N.J. Misc. 182 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 19, 1940

Herdman Motor Co. v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1937), 119 N. J. L. 164; 194 Atl. Rep. 870 . The determination is one of fact in each ease. … See Hoboken v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment (Supreme Court, 1930), 107 N. J. L. 35; 151 Atl. Rep. 364 ; affirmed (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1931), 108 N. J. L. 195; 156 Atl. Rep. 377 ; Hoboken v.

Diorio v. Atlantic City Sewerage Co.

20 N.J. Misc. 105 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 10, 1942

See Post v. Warren Point Volunteer Firemens (State Board, 1941), 19 N. J. Mis. R. 367; 19 Atl. Rep. (2d) 636. … Central Railroad Co. v. Thayer Martin (Supreme Court, 1934), 114 N. J. L. 69, 76; 175 Atl. Rep. 637 ; Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1939), 122 N. J. L. 596; 7 Atl. Rep. (2d) 628.

Classen v. State

131 Misc. 2d 346 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1985

(See, e.g., Matter of Calzadilla v Dooley, 29 AD2d 152 ; Matter of Griffith v Krulewitch, 51 Misc 2d 352 ; Matter of Tilelli v Christenberry, 1 Misc 2d 139 .) … (Asch v City of New York, 34 AD2d 778 ; Rios v State of New York, 67 AD2d 744 ; cf. Boland v State of New York, 30 NY2d 337 .)

Thomas, Kenneth v. Thompson Industrial Services

2020 TN WC 46 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 26, 2020

Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.