Case law

People v. Bergen Beach Yacht Club

160 Misc. 2d 939 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Feb 16, 1994

Corp. v Klein, supra, at 695; Matter of Di Maggio v Brown, 19 NY2d 283 [1967].) … Corp. v Klein, supra, at 693.) A mere showing of selective enforcement or nonenforcement against others similarly situated will not suffice. (Matter of Di Maggio v Brown, supra, at 291.)

In re the Construction of the Will of Hennig

6 Misc. 2d 156 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 10, 1956

The court holds that these bequests were not absolute as gifts to the petitioner individually but were made to him in his fiduciary capacity (Reynolds v. Reynolds, 224 N. … Y. 429 ; Matter of Lehmaier, 183 Misc. 592 ; Matter of Brown, 122 N. Y. S. 2d 640; Matter of Sutta, 54 N. Y. S. 2d 572, affd. 265 App. Div. 994 ).

Thomas v. McLeod

Massachusetts Land Court · Aug 2, 2021

Unless brought by a municipal officer or board, a court has jurisdiction to consider a zoning appeal only if it is taken by an aggrieved person." Barvenik v. Board of Alderman, 33 Mass. App. Ct. 129 , 131 (1992). … SO ORDERED FOOTNOTES [Note 1] Marashlian v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 421 Mass. 719 , 721 (1996), quoting Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 324 Mass. 427 , 430 (1949). Accord Picard v.

Nelson v. Alliance Hospitality Mgmt., LLC

2011 NCBC 42 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 22, 2011

Nelson v. Alliance Hospitality Mgmt., LLC, 2011 NCBC 42. … See, e.g., Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 102−03, 176 S.E.2d 161, 166 (1970); Crouse v. Mineo, 189 N.C. App. 232, 237, 658 S.E.2d 33, 36 (2008); Harris v. NCNB Nat’l Bank of N.C., 85 N.C.

Taub v. Rolfe

93 Misc. 2d 184 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Feb 24, 1978

(Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 743; De Vita v Pianisani, 127 Misc 611 .) There is one exception. … To add to the confusion, it appears that the petitioner has applied to the Conciliation and Appeals Board for the very same relief.

Beeler, Bert v. Eric Corum d/b/a Gable to Stable Construction

2020 TN WC 15 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 31, 2020

See Ducros v. Metro Roofing and Metal Supply Co., Inc., TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … See Young v. Young Elec., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *16 (May 25, 2016). Concerning temporary disability benefits, Mr.

Ragone v. State

123 Misc. 48 · New York Court of Claims · Mar 29, 1924

(Kerrigan v. Hart, 40 Hun, *52 390 , 391; Williams Case, supra; Ryan v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 35 N. Y. 210 ; Lowery v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 99 id. 158; Pollett v. Long, 56- id. 200; Hofnagle v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. … The case of Smith v. State, 227 N.

Thompson, David v. Comcast Corporation

2018 TN WC App. 1 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 30, 2018

Brown v. Erachem Comilog, Inc., 231 S.W.3d 918, 921 (Tenn. 2007) (internal citation omitted). … The Appeals Board has consistently described this burden of proof as a “lesser evidentiary standard” than the preponderance of the evidence. Helgerson v. Packer Sanitation Servs., Inc., No. 2014-03-0023, 2015 TN Wrk.

Roman Catholic Archdiocese v. City of East Orange

17 N.J. Tax 298 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 27, 1998

In National Music Camp v. … Lease to the East Orange Board of Education Finally, I turn to that portion of the Our Lady of All Souls property leased to the East Orange Board of Education in 1993 and 1994.

In re the Estate of Herman

43 Misc. 2d 309 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 25, 1964

Brown, J. and Acting Surrogate. … Hochstadt, 23 Misc 2d 803 ; Truesell v. Kostiw, 35 Misc 2d 60 ). As mentioned in Jacobs v.

Taylor v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.

2011 Ohio 5726 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jul 21, 2011

[Cite as Taylor v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 2011-Ohio-5726.] … See Sandu v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., Ct. of Cl. No. 2008-02606-AD, 2008- Ohio-6858, Gerzina v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., Ct. of Cl. No. 2010-09809-AD, 2011-Ohio- 1952.

Moffitt, David v. Allied Metals Company

2018 TN WC App. 17 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 30, 2018

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD David Moffitt ) Docket No. 2016-02-0282 ) v. … Hensley delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge Timothy W. Conner joined. Larry V.

Dubrow v. Briansky Saratoga Ballet Center, Inc.

68 Misc. 2d 530 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 27, 1971

See, also, Lacy v. Getman ( 119 N. Y. 109 ); Spalding v. Rosa ( 71 N. Y. 40 ). … In this respect the case differs from William v. Stein ( 100 Misc. 677 ) and Drucker v.

Matrix Bordentown, Lot 2, LLC v. Director, Division of Taxation

New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 25, 2025

In Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. … Ridgewood Commons Group v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 25 N.J. Tax 188, 195 (Tax 2009). In Metromedia, Inc. v.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 2005

. ¶ 4 Your question relates to the portion of the Act governing funding by state agencies, departments, boards, councils and commissions, referred to collectively herein as governmental entities. … Brigance v. Velvet Dove Rest., 756 P.2d 1232 , 1235 (Okla. 1988). "[R]ules of statutory construction are not applied where the Legislature plainly expresses its intent." Id.

City of Newark v. New Jersey Investment Co.

18 N.J. Misc. 182 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 19, 1940

Herdman Motor Co. v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1937), 119 N. J. L. 164; 194 Atl. Rep. 870 . The determination is one of fact in each ease. … See Hoboken v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment (Supreme Court, 1930), 107 N. J. L. 35; 151 Atl. Rep. 364 ; affirmed (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1931), 108 N. J. L. 195; 156 Atl. Rep. 377 ; Hoboken v.

Classen v. State

131 Misc. 2d 346 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1985

(See, e.g., Matter of Calzadilla v Dooley, 29 AD2d 152 ; Matter of Griffith v Krulewitch, 51 Misc 2d 352 ; Matter of Tilelli v Christenberry, 1 Misc 2d 139 .) … (Asch v City of New York, 34 AD2d 778 ; Rios v State of New York, 67 AD2d 744 ; cf. Boland v State of New York, 30 NY2d 337 .)

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 21, 2000

The Oklahoma State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners' Rule, OAC 775:10-5-30 (f)(3) (2000) set forth above, is a clear prohibition on such practice. … "Rules and regulations enacted by administrative agencies and boards pursuant to the powers delegated to them have the force and effect of law." Cox v.

Wrightstown Borough v. Medved

4 N.J. Tax 582 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 20, 1982

Orr v. Orr, supra 440 U.S. at 279 , 99 S.Ct. at 1111 , 59 L.Ed.2d at 319 ; Baker v. Harris, 503 F.Supp. 863, 865 (D.C.Dist.1980). *591 In Kahn v. … The judgment of the county board of taxation is reversed and the assessment, as reduced by the county board’s prior judgment of October 13, 1981, is reinstated.

Opinion No. 74-152 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1974

Boydston v. State, 277 P.2d 138 (1955); Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 , 668 . … City of Duncan v. Bingham, Okl., 394 P.2d 456 (1964).