Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

4.10s

  • City of East Orange v. Township of Livingston

    27 N.J. Tax 161 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 31, 2013

    Centorino v. … Murnick v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Fee, Jack v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.

    2020 TN WC 9 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 27, 2020

    Hadzic v. Averitt Express, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 14, at *8 (May 18, 2015) (courts must consider the plain and ordinary meaning of the statutory language when no guiding precedent exists). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Walls, Bob v. United Technologies Corp.

    2021 TN WC 150 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 26, 2021

    The Appeals Board addressed this question in Morgan v. Macy’s, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 39 (Aug. 31, 2016). It gave two methods by which UTC might rebut the presumption of necessity of the proposed surgery. … Thomas v. Aetna Life and Cas. Co., 812 S.W.2d 278, 283 (Tenn. 1991).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dawson, Beandy v. Optum services, Inc.

    2024 TN WC 25 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 27, 2024

    Robert Thompson, a board-certified vascular surgeon and brachial plexus specialist, with “uncommon” expertise in thoracic outlet. Dr. … See Thompson v. Comcast Corp., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bell Pub. Co. v. Garrett Engineering Co.

    170 S.W.2d 197 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 17, 1943

    Moore v. Levcrett, Tex.Com.App., 52 S.W.2d 252 ; A. H. Belo & Co. v. Looney, 112 Tex. 160 , 246 S.W. 777 ; Ferguson v. … Moore v. Leverett, A. H. Belo & Co. v. Looney, Ferguson v. Houston Press Co., affirmed Tex.Com.App., and Galveston Tribune v. Johnson, Tex.Civ.App., 141 S.W. 302 (writ refused), all supra.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Gibbons v. Department of Revenue

    9 Or. Tax 285 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 15, 1982

    Tollefsen v. Commissioner, 431 F2d 511 (2d Cir 1970), 26 AFTR2d 70-5037, cert denied 401 US 908 (1971); Gibbs v. Tomlinson, 362 F2d 394 (5th Cir 1966), 17 AFTR2d 1251; Chism’s Est. v. … In Alterman Foods, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Taft

    143 Misc. 387 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 11, 1932

    Div. 934 ; Marre v. … Since the testator died prior to 1921, in which year section 47-a of the Decedent Estate Law took effect, the rule of Soper v. Brown ( 136 N.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Ephran, Linda v. Trane Commercial Systems

    2016 TN WC 125 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 20, 2016

    McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7- 8, 9 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015). … ENTERED THIS THE 2o'•o~~ L Robert V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc. v. Feldman

    109 Misc. 2d 403 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Sep 19, 1980

    The purpose of Regulation T is to prevent the draining of a disproportionate amount of the Nation’s credit resources into the stock market (see Newman v Pershing & Co., 412 F Supp 463 ; Stonehill v Security Nat. … (See Newman v Pershing & Co., 412 F Supp 463 , supra.)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Vickers, Kimberly v. Amazon

    2019 TN WC 72 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 2, 2019

    Dye v. Witco Corp. , 216 S.W.3d 317,321 (Tenn. 2007). 1 class mail today." … To appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Haynes

    14 Wend. 546 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1835

    Rex v. Ellins, Russ, & Ryan’s C. C. R. 188. See also Rex v. Shaw, 3 W. Black. R. 790. In the case of The King v. Hunt, 3 Camb. … Young v. The King, 3 T.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Laboyteaux, Karen v. Benjamin Begley & Tiffany Begley d/b/a/ Homestead Family Table & Monstermash Concepts, LLC

    2021 TN WC 240 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 16, 2021

    Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alumni Ass'n of Delta Chapter of Zeta PSI Fraternity of North America v. City of New Brunswick

    18 N.J. Misc. 131 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 20, 1940

    Petitioner heretofore duly filed its petition of appeal with the board, praying cancellation of an assessment levied for the year 1938 by the respondent taxing district upon a college fraternity house and lot and personalty … See Rutgers Association of Beta Theta Pi v. City of New Brunswick (State Board), filed November 28th, 1939.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation

    22 N.J. Tax 399 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 9, 2005

    Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. 159, 169 , 103 S.Ct. 2933, 2942 , 77 L.Ed.2d 545, 556 (1983). … Ry. v. Browning, 310 U.S. 362, 365 , 60 S.Ct. 968, 970 , 84 L.Ed. 1254 (1940)).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Oviett v. Warner

    288 S.W. 434 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 1, 1926

    W. 816 ; Foster v. Ross, 33 Tex. Civ. App. 615 (writ refused) 77 S. W. 990 ; Simmons Hdw. Co. v. Adams (Tex. Civ. App.) 147 S. W. 1196 ; and Bergman Produce Co. v. Brown (Tex. Civ, App.) 156 S. … Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Mid Oil Co. v. Department of Revenue

    9 Or. Tax 381 · Oregon Tax Court · Feb 13, 1984

    appealed to the Lane County Board of Equalization. … Erwin v. Dept. of Rev. et al, 7 OTR 539, 544-545 (1978), and Rosboro Lbr Co. v. Heine et al, 8 OTR 221, 226 (1979).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Norton v. Sillcocks

    4 Dem. Sur. 145 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1885

    Ch., 375; Andrews v. Partington, 3 Brown, C. C., 60; Buckworth v. Buckworth, 1 Cox Eq. Cas., 80; Holtzman v. Castleman, 2 McArthur, 555; Tompkins v. Tompkins, 18 N. J. Eq., 393 ; McKnight’s Exr’s v. Walsh, 23 N. J. … Eq., 136; Harring v. Coles, 2 Bradf., 353 ; Voessing v. Voessing, 4 Redf., 364 ; Brown v. Casamajor, 4 Ves. Jr., 498; Matter of Burke, 4 Sandf. Ch., 617, and cases cited in note).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-181 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 3, 1968

    This concept of constitutional interpretation was applied by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in McCurtain County Excise Board v. St. … In Baker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bockey v. Johnson Constr.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 1, 2004

    Faircloth saw plaintiff step on the scaffolding board on the outside of the ladder jack. As would be expected, the other end of the board went up in the air and plaintiff began to fall. … Anderson v. Century Data Systems, Inc. , 71 N.C. App. 540 , 547 , 322 S.E.2d 638 , 642 (1984).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Steele v. State

    19 Misc. 3d 766 · New York Court of Claims · Feb 22, 2008

    of New York, 1 NY3d at 210 ; Matter of Miller v Board of Assessors, 91 NY2d at 86 ). … Board of Assessors, 91 NY2d 82 [1997], supra)] . . .

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.