Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.09s

  • Opinion No. (1993)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 6, 1993

    ISSUED BY SUCH BOARDS." … HAWKS V. BLAND, 9 P.2D 720 (OKLA. 1932).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas, Horace Wade v. Zipp Express

    2017 TN WC App. 71 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 30, 2017

    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Horace Wade Thomas ) Docket No. 2015-06-0546 ) v. … Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Winters

    208 Misc. 953 · New York Family Court · Nov 16, 1955

    I do not have the authority to direct that the board of education be compelled to accept this child in first grade. It would seem from a first reading of the Matter of Isquith v. Levitt ( 285 App. … That section gives further permission to the boards to fix a higher minimum age for admission but is silent as to authority to change the maximum.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hawley v. State

    28 Misc. 2d 150 · New York Court of Claims · Jun 29, 1961

    silo, the board or platform collapsed, causing Lawrence Hawley to be thrown about 40 feet to the ground. … (Arias v. State of New York, 166 Misc. 164 .)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Dilmar Oil Company

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 16, 2009

    Brown recommended that Plaintiff lose weight and perform the exercises given to him during his previous physical therapy. Further, Dr. Brown agreed with Dr. … In Carter v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceeding of Bauerdorf

    9 Mills Surr. 465 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 15, 1912

    The court in Schmidt v. Jewett leans wholly on Soper v. Brown, 136 N. Y. 244, 248 . While in Soper v. … The enunciation of the rule in Soper v. Brown, if not very guarded, is certainly plain and unequivocal. If it evinces anything it evinces an adoption of the principal rule in its integrity.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Reimers

    134 Misc. 753 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 4, 1929

    (Doughty v. Stilwell, 1 Bradf. Sur. 300; Walton v. Walton, 7 Johns. Ch. 258 ; Gardner v. Printup, 2 Barb. 83 ; Brown v. Brown, 16 id. 569; Matter of Howard, 46 Misc. 204 ; Waldo v. Hayes, 96 App. Div. 454 .) … (Hawley v. James, 5 Paige, 318 ; Gifford v. Rising, 51 Hun, 1 ; Borst v. Crommie, 19 id. 209; Walker v. Downer, 55 id. 75; Lasher v. Lasher, 13 Barb. 106 ; Dodge v. Manning, 1 N. Y. 298 ; Thurber v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Birdsall

    2 Gibb. Surr. 293 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1897

    Hatter of Nichols, 91 Hun, 138 ; Tompkins v. Hunter, 149 N. Y. 117 -122. … If v?e hold this to be the meaning of this language it seems to us that it will defeat *315 the very purpose of the amendment.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Catalano v. Long Island Jewish Hospital

    93 Misc. 2d 695 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Mar 29, 1978

    (Brown v University of Rochester, 77 Misc 2d 221, 223 , affd 46 AD2d 1016 .) … (See CPLR 3126; Merck, Sharp & Dohme v Whitted, 77 Misc 2d 8 ; Adamo v Kirsch Beverages, 80 Misc 2d 369 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 75-169 (1975) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 25, 1975

    v. … See, for instance, Board of Commissioners of Comanche County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Aliyy, Rakin v. LG Electronics

    2021 TN WC 250 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 8, 2021

    Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nu Beta Alumni Ass'n v. City of New Brunswick

    7 N.J. Tax 379 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 22, 1984

    Board of National Missions, etc. v. Neeld, 9 N.J. 349, 353 , 88 A. 2d 500 (1952). The burden is upon the claimant to clearly bring himself within the exemption provision. Ibid. … Id. at 606 ; see Cornell v. Thorne, 184 Misc. 630 , 57 N.Y.S.2d 6 (Sup.Ct.1945); Knox College v. Board of Review, 308 Ill. 160 , 139 N.E. 56 (Sup.Ct.1923); Cornell University v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Havey, Julia v. SageHome, LLC, dba New Bath Today

    2025 TN WC App. 23 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 11, 2025

    Weaver delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Timothy W. Conner and Judge Pele I. Godkin joined. … Lindsey v. Trinity Commc’ns Inc., 275 S.W.3d at 418.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-209 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 15, 1972

    We must infer from Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v. … See also Drolte v. Board of Commissioners of Ellis County, 176 Okl. 622 , 56 P.2d 800 (1936). The case of Bass v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Qualls, Steven v. Federal Mogul

    2023 TN WC App. 8 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 7, 2023

    Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Galloway Township v. Dorflinger

    2 N.J. Tax 358 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 31, 1981

    Co. v. … In Bayonne v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-130 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 5, 1968

    See also Bond et al., v. Phelps, 200 Okl. 71 , 191 P.2d 983 , and Aubrey, Superior Court Judge v. … For cases following the same rule from other jurisdictions see Coleman, Auditor v. Hurst, 226 Ky. 501 , 115 S.W.2d 133 ; Kilroy v. Whitmore, 115 Pa. 1 , App. 43, 300 P. 851 ; Livingston v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith, Zackery v. Everidge, Inc.

    2020 TN WC App. 6 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 10, 2020

    Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mannie Joseph, Inc. v. Stewart

    71 Misc. 2d 160 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 7, 1972

    I find that the defense of breach of implied warranty of fitness for human habitation has been more than .sustained (Amanuensis, Ltd. v. Brown, 65 Misc 2d 15 ).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Fifty Central Park West Corp. v. Bastien

    60 Misc. 2d 195 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 10, 1969

    Trust Co. v. Prendergast, 202 N. Y. 188 ; Matter of Church, 92 N. Y. 1 ; Koster v. Coyne, 110 App. Div. 742 , affd. 184 N. Y. 494 ). … (Meltzer v. Koenigsberg, 302 N. Y. 523, 525 .)

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.