Case law

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 11, 1982

OPINION — AG — ** CONFLICT OF INTEREST — LEGISLATOR — SCHOOL SYSTEM ** (1) ARTICLE V , SECTION 23 OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION, WHICH PROHIBITS A LEGISLATOR FROM BEING INTERESTED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN ANY CONTRACT WITH THE STATE … (EMPLOYMENT, LEGISLATOR, SCHOOL BOARD, BOARD OF EDUCATION, STATE FUNDS, SUPPORT, SALARY) CITE: 74 O.S. 1409 [ 74-1409 ], 74 O.S. 1413 [ 74-1413 ], ARTICLE II, SECTION 11, ARTICLE V, SECTION 23, OPINION NO. 71-233, OPINION

Sloan v. State Employees Credit Union

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 11, 2000

Leighton, only board eligible, is an osteopath and not a medical doctor. … Hansel v. Sherman Textiles, 304 N.C. 44 , 283 S.E.2d 101 (1981).

Seiferth, Stephen v. Ingles Markets, Inc.

2015 TN WC App. 39 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 4, 2015

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Robin Moore ) Docket No. 2015-02-0193 … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.

Hanna, Emad v. Gaylord Opryland, d/b/a Marriott International

2022 TN WC 24 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 7, 2022

As to past medical expenses, in Miller v. Lowe’s Home Center, Inc., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Opinion No. 68-116 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 8, 1968

In New Mexico Board of Examiners v. … The court in New Mexico Board of Examiners v. Roberts, Head, et al, supra, in concluding there was no unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce quoted from Kelly v.

Rockaway Pacific Corp. v. State

119 Misc. 550 · New York Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1922

Y. 140 , which was a case decided by the former Board of Claims. … Jermain v. Thayer, 63 N. Y. 348, 352 .

Branch, Chasidy v. Professional Care Services

2022 TN WC 61 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 26, 2022

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT JACKSON CHASIDY BRANCH, ) Docket No. 2021-07-0486 Employee, ) V. ) PROFESSIONAL CARE SERVICES, ) State File No. 34241-2021 Employer … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 7, 1991

DAVIS V. SPURRIER LUMBER CO., 15 P.2D 131 (OKLA. 1932). HOWEVER, THIS LEGAL PRINCIPLE HAS BEEN HELD NOT TO APPLY TO A GOVERNMENTAL TENANT BECAUSE SUCH WOULD CONSTITUTE AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL GIFT TO A PRIVATE PERSON. … DERIEA V. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWN OF CARNEAIE, 216 P.2D 307 (OKLA. 1950).

In re the Estate of Braun

194 Misc. 791 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1949

The respondent testified that during all her married life with the decedent, she was a housewife with no independent income except such as she received during one period from a married couple who boarded with them. … Each, by the form of these accounts, must have intended to create a right of survivorship in the other (Belfanc v. Belfanc, 252 App. Div. 453 , affd. 278 N.

Opinion No. 75-236 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 31, 1975

Schindledecker v. Borough of New Bethlehem, 20 A.2d 867 (Pa. 1941). … Chavez v. Sprague, 209 C.A.2d 101, 25 Cal.Rptr. 603 .

Abdullah v. Ohio State Univ.

2025 Ohio 5876 · Ohio Court of Claims · Dec 3, 2025

Orr v. Schweitzer, 2021- Ohio-1786, ¶ 12, quoting Murphy v. Reynoldsburg, 65 Ohio St.3d 356, 358 (1992). … Grubach v.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Central Union Trust Co.

119 Misc. 190 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1922

Kershaw v. Kelsey, 100 Mass. 561 ; Clarke v. Morey, 10 Johns. 68 , 72; Brown v. United States, 8 Cranch, 110 . As was said by Chief Justice Marshall in Brown v. … Sands v. N. Y. Life Insurance Co., 50 N. Y. 626 ; Brown v. United States, supra. Nor did the fact that the bequest became operative during the war violate the Trading With the Enemy Act.

Opinion No. 50-0318

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 1950

OPINION — AG — ** FUNDS TRANSFER — SURPLUS TO SINKING ** QUESTION: CAN THE SCHOOL BOARD OF GARBER LEGALLY TRANSFER A GENERAL FUND SURPLUS TO ITS SINKING FUND ? — NEGATIVE (SEE: 'TULSA COUNTY EXCISE BOARD V.

Opinion No. (1997)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 12, 1997

See Northwest Datsun v. … Taylor v.

In re the Accounting of Kings County Trust Co.

203 Misc. 956 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 20, 1953

That duty of general care and conduct of the corporate affairs is cast upon the board of directors as a body and not as individuals (Fox v. Arctic Placer Mining & Milling Co., 229 N. Y. 124,132 ). … v.

Question Submitted by: Senator Mary B. Boren, Oklahoma State Senate, District 16

2024 OK AG 5 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 2024

Hatfield v. Jimerson, 1961 OK 250, ¶ 9 , 365 P.2d 980, 982 (quoting State ex rel. Tayrien v. … , Transportation Commission, ODOT County Advisory Board, ODOT Tribal Advisory Board, Committee on the Pilot Shortage, Highway Construction Materials Technician Certification Board, Interstate Midwest Reginal Passenger Rail

Williams, Devery v. JL Malone & Associates/Fishel Company

2019 TN WC 118 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 2, 2019

Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). Concerning temporary partial disability, Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

In re Preadoption Certificate Concerning the Child Carballo

137 Misc. 2d 553 · New York Family Court · Nov 2, 1987

of this section shall not restrict or limit the right of a parent, legal guardian or relative within the second degree to place out or board out a child.” … In concluding that the activities of the attorney in this case are in violation of the Social Services Law this court is not unmindful of the Court of Appeals decision of People v Scopas ( 11 NY2d 120 [1962]).

Opinion No. 80-072 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 7, 1980

See In re Block 1, Donly Heights Addition, 194 Okl. 221 , 149 P.2d 265 , (1944); Wright v. State, 192 Okl. 493 , 137 P.2d 796 (1943), and Ward v. State, 176 Okl. 368 , 56 P.2d 136 (1936). … Board of Education of City of Tulsa v. Morley, 168 Okl. 259 , 34 P.2d 258 (1934).

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 1983

OPINION — AG — ** INDIAN TERRITORY — COUNTY EXCISE BOARD — MILLAGE RATE ** (1) PURSUANT TO 11 O.S. 21 -109 [ 11-21-109 ], A COUNTY EXCISE BOARD OF ANY COUNTY IN THE STATE CAN APPLY A DIFFERENT MILLAGE RATE, THAN IS APPLIED … , ARTICLE V, SECTION 6, ARTICLE X, SECTION 8 (GERALD E.