Case law

Opinion No. Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 30, 1983

* 60 O.S. 60 [ 60-60 ], AS AMENDED, REQUIRING STATE AGENCIES AND OTHER STATE ENTITIES TO USE CONSULTANT CONTRACT FORMS AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FORMS DEVELOPED BY THE STATE CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATOR, AS APPLIED TO THE BOARD … NOVEMBER 9, 1959 — REGENTS, ARTICLE VIII, SECTION 8, ARTICLE VI, SECTION 31(A), ARTICLE VI, SECTION 31, ARTICLE V, SECTION 36 (GERALD E. WEIS)

Hulett v. Bek Const. Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 5, 2001

Since his injury, plaintiff also worked as a millwright for Brown Root. Plaintiff was employed by Brown Root for two weeks. … Stat. § 97-29 ; Deese v. Champion International Corp ., 133 N.C. App. 278 , 515 S.E.2d 239 (1999). 4.

Harter v. State

106 Misc. 9 · New York Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1919

The leading case on this subject is Carhart v. State of New York, 115 App. Div. 1 . … This principle was affirmed in Ostrander v. State of New York, 192 N. Y. 415 . We applied it in a case identical in principle with the one at bar very recently. In Cooper v. State of New York, 103 Misc.

Opinion No. 68-229 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 11, 1968

I believe the Board of County Commissioners of Carter County would have no objection to the payment of the full salary of this additional employee; and frankly, I have one or two counties in my district that simply cannot … The following language from the second paragraph of the syllabus of the opinion in the case of Rogers v.

In re the Appraisal under the Transfer Tax Law of the Estate of Dunn

118 Misc. 426 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1922

Rep. 648 ) and for that reason was not taxable (Matter of Weiler, supra; Matter of Riemann, supra; Matter of Browning, 95 Misc. Rep. 459 ) unless the realty was devised in lieu of her dower and accepted by her. … Smith v. Browning, 225 N. Y. 358, 363 ; Matter of Terry, 218 id. 218, 222.

In re the Estate of Sparks

1 Mills Surr. 70 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1899

Shannon v. Pickell, 55 Hun, 127, 130 ; Prowitt v. Rodman, 37 N. Y. 42 . … Matter of Brown, 93 N. Y. 295 .

London Terrace Towers, Inc. v. Davis

6 Misc. 3d 600 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 6, 2004

(See Andre v Pomeroy, 35 NY2d 361, 364 [1974].) … to cooperative board’s refusal to reallocate shares]; Rubinstein v 242 Apt.

Gibbs, Doris v. EXPRESS SERVICES, INC., aka ) EXPRESS EMPLOYMENT ) PROFESSIONALS

2020 TN WC 103 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 20, 2020

To appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1. … The appealing party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board.

Opinion No. 68-169 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 23, 1968

The local Board of Education shall reimburse the State Examiner and Inspector for all amounts advanced by him for the making of such audit." … In re Via's Estate, Okl., 295 P.2d 779 ; Anderson Hotels of Oklahoma v. Baker, 190 F.2d 41 (10th Cir. 1951), certiorari denied, 72 S.Ct. 111 , 342 U.S. 869 , 96 L.Ed. 654 .

Lamm Associates v. Borough of West Caldwell

1 N.J. Tax 373 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 9, 1980

See In re Erie Railroad System, 19 N.J. 110, 130 , 115 A.2d 89 (1955); New Brunswick v. State of N. J. Div. of Tax Appeals, 39 N.J. 537, 545 , 189 A.2d 702 (1963); and Park *386 view Village Assoc. v. … See, New Brunswick v. State of N.J. Div. of Tax Appeals, supra.

Bloodsaw, Talisha v. Alexian Brothers Community Services d/b/a Alexian Brothers PACE

2020 TN WC 56 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 16, 2020

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT CHATTANOOGA Talisha Bloodsaw, ) Docket No. 2019-01-0653 Employee, ) V. ) Alexian Brothers Community ) Services d/b/a Alexian Brothers … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Freda, Joseph A. by Acme as Tenant v. City of Sea Isle City

New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 6, 2024

As to the planning board escrow fees, the City is in the same predicament. A municipality collects escrow fees to cover the professional fees it incurs for application reviews and inspections. Flama Constr. Corp. v. … J&J Realty Co. v. Township of Wayne, 22 N.J. Tax 157, 163 (Tax 2005); See also Great Adventure, Inc. v. Township of Jackson, 10 N.J. Tax 230, 233 (App. Div. 1988); ML Plainsboro Ltd. P’ship v.

Bloomingdale's Inc and Bloomingdale's C/O Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Hackensack City (6 Appeals)

New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 29, 2022

City of Elizabeth v. 264 First St., LLC, 28 N.J. Tax 408, 425 (Tax 2015) (citing N.J. State League of Municipalities v. Kimmelman, 105 N.J. 422, 428 (1987)). … [State v. Hawkens, 50 N.J.L. 122, 125 (1887).] See also L. Bamberger & Co. v.

Enriquez, Salvador v. Defender Services, Inc.

2022 TN WC 92 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 27, 2022

Hibbitts v. Kim Royal d/b/a Royal Guttering, 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 10, at *6 (Mar. 23, 2021). In a previous expedited hearing, the Court found Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Martin v. Accel Schools Ohio

2024 Ohio 5965 · Ohio Court of Claims · Nov 25, 2024

That entity is roughly analogous to the board of education of a public school district. Adm. … Brown v. Columbiana Cty. Jail, 2024-Ohio- 4969, is not to the contrary.

Wilson v. Hopewell Township

23 N.J. Tax 240 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 19, 2006

Burlington Tp. v. Messer, 8 N.J.Tax 274 (Tax 1986), aff'd 9 N.J.Tax 634 (App.Div.1987); South Brunswick Tp. v. Bellemead Development Corp., 8 N.J.Tax 616, 624-25 (Tax 1987); Angelini v. … In Alexandria Tp. v.

Scruggs, Carla v. Amazon.com Services, LLC

2022 TN WC App. 43 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 19, 2022

Yarbrough v. Protective Servs. Co., Inc., No. 2015-08-0574, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 3, at *11 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Jan. 25, 2016); see also Burnette v. … R. & Regs. 0800-02-22-.09(4), which states: When it appears to the appeals board that an appeal was frivolous or taken solely for delay, the appeals board may, either upon motion of a party or of 1 Penalties

Mendez, Jose v. Eskola Roofing

2022 TN WC 12 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 9, 2022

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Here, Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Linden Hill No. 1 Cooperative Corp. v. Kleiner

124 Misc. 2d 1001 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jun 20, 1984

(Hauptman v 222 East 80th St. … Corp. v Kenny (supra, at p 1003) the court stated: “An examination of the relationship in a housing co-operative reveals that a minority shareholder is often as powerless against the board of directors as any tenant vis-á-vis

Opinion No. 68-291 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 22, 1968

"The boards questions are whether or not under the provisions of 2 O.S. 99 [2-99] those students attending Woods County School District No. … (See Dierks v. Walsh, Okl., 218 P.2d 920 .) It is therefore the opinion of the Attorney General that the answer to your first question is that the students attending Woods County School District No.