Case law

Opinion No. 80-214 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 9, 1980

In construing 364, the Supreme Court said in Board of Trustees v. … State v. Police Pension Board, 56 Wis.2d 602 , 203 N.W.2d 74 (1973); City of Duncan v. Bingham, Okl., 394 P.2d 456 , 460 (1964); Board of Trustees v. Hicks, supra.

Sadigur v. State

173 Misc. 645 · New York Court of Claims · Mar 7, 1940

Y. 308 ; People v. Dennison, 84 id. 272; Metropolitan Trust Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 220 id. 344; MacMullen v. City of Middletown, 187 id. 37.) … However, this case must be read and considered in the light of the decision of the same court in the case of Spa Baths Co. v. Board of Commissioners ( 98 Misc. 399 ; affd., 181 App. Div. 960 ).

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 15, 1994

Sneed v. Sneed, 585 P.2d 1363 (Okla. 1978). … Southwestern Bell Co. v. Oklahoma Co., 618 P.2d 915 , 919 (Okla. 1980).

Axelrod v. Various Tenants

123 Misc. 2d 922 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 19, 1984

board), or other authority, acting pursuant to state or local law as it affects projects covered by this subpart.” … In City of Boston v Harris (619 F2d 87), the City of Boston challenged the HUD regulations which preempted all local rent-control laws as applied to Federally insured subsidized projects.

Johnson, Essie v. First United Methodist Church

2016 TN WC 179 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 5, 2016

Prior to the Court's ruling on Employer's Motion to Dismiss, the Appeals Board issued its decision in Syph v. Food Choice Group, Inc., No. 2015-06-0288, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 18 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. … Rye v. Women's Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).

Strong v. Strong

98 S.W.2d 346 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 2, 1936

See Gilmore v. O’Neil, 107 Tex. 18 , 173 S.W. 203 ; Deaton v. Rush, 113 Tex. 176, 197 , 252 S.W. 1025 ; Pure Oil Co. v. Swindall (Tex.Com.App.) 58 S.W.(2d) 7 ; Edwards v. Brown, 68 Tex. 329 , 4 S.W. 380, 5 . … B. slept and ate in the home with the other members of the family and paid no board except by his work on the farm. His father furnished him horses, corn, and implements.

Plushanski v. Union Township

1 N.J. Tax 520 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 29, 1980

Schere v. Tp. of Freehold, 150 N.J.Super. 404 , 375 A.2d 1218 (App.Div.1977). The highest and best use of the property must be considered in valuing land under N.J.S.A. 54:4-23. Hackensack Water Co. v. … S.A. 54:4-23, was addressed in Division of Tax Appeals v. Ewing Tp., 72 N.J.Super. 238 , 178 A.2d 229 (App.Div.1962).

Quaker Oats Co. v. Department of Local Government Finance

782 N.E.2d 1077 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 7, 2003

ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review The Court gives great deference to the State Board's final determinations when it acts within the seope of its authority. Wetzel Enters., Inc. v. … The taxpayer bears the burden of demonstrating the invalidity of the State Board's final determination. 4 Clark v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 694 N.E.2d 1230, 1233 (Ind. Tax Ct.1998).

Rolffs v. Springfield Tp.

26 N.J. Misc. 326 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 11, 1949

City of Newark v. Timer, 170 A. 37 , 12 N.J.Misc. 125. … In Becker v.

Williams, Bobby v. CoreCivic

2019 TN WC App. 44 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 15, 2019

See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013). … Pfizer, Inc. v. Johnson, No. M2004-00041-COA-R3-CV, 2006 Tenn. App. LEXIS 44, at *7 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2006).

Klamath Production Credit Assoc. v. State Tax Commission

3 Or. Tax 16 · Oregon Tax Court · May 5, 1967

General Motors Corp. v. District of Columbia, 380 US 553 , 85 S Ct 1156 , 14 L ed2d 68, 73 (Í965). Speaking of the allocation formula, Justice Warner in Dutton Lbr. Corp. v. … Transit Co. v.

Opinion No. (2004)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 3, 2004

Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16, 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). … Cooper v. State ex rel. Dep't of Pub.

Franco, Gilbert v. Jaime Rivera and Oscar Sanchaz, d/b/a J&O Construction and Remodeling

2022 TN WC 39 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 4, 2022

Mollica v. EHHI Holdings, Inc., 2020 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *7 (Apr. 21, 2020). Further, Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Bryant, Stephanie v. Frito Lay, Inc.

2018 TN WC 163 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 8, 2018

CLAIMS IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MURFREESBORO STEPHANIE BRYANT, ) Docket No. 2018-05-0187 Employee, ) v. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Bennett, Preston v. Suretech Construction

2020 TN WC App. 37 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 3, 2020

Doe 1 v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Nashville, 154 S.W.3d 22, 42 (Tenn. 2005); Benton v. Snyder, 825 S.W.2d 409, 416 (Tenn. 1992). … Konvalinka v. Chattanooga-Hamilton Cnty. Hosp. Auth., 249 S.W.3d 346, 358 (Tenn. 2008). “Whether a court applied an incorrect legal standard is a question of law that is reviewed de novo.” Funk v.

Opinion No. 78-249 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1978

The first manner of actual distribution contemplated by the act would be, where appropriate, a direct distribution of the total increase by the governing board of education to the teacher, i.e., an across the board increase … U.S. v. Allen, 179 F. 13 , 103 CCA 1 (1910); Missouri, OG Ry Co. v. State, 119 P. 117 , 29 Okl. 640 (1911).

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 11, 1998

Section 789 of Title 19 mandates in pertinent part: It shall be the duty of the board of county commissioners to place the management and control of said hospital either under a board of control composed of five, seven or … If the board of county commissioners determines it is for the best interest of the county, they may in lieu of operation of the hospital through a board of control lease the hospital and equipment therein to a charitable

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1989

YORK V. … SEE, RASURE V. SPARKS, OKL. 75 OKL. 181, 183 P. 495 , 498 (1919) AND PAN AMERICAN PETRO. CORP. V. BOARD OF TAXROLL COR., OKL., 510 P.2D 680, 681 (1973).

Opinion No. (2004)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 19, 2004

Howard v. Crawford, 16 P.3d 473 , 477 (Okla.Ct.App. 2000). … Co. v. Excise Bd., 29 P.2d 586 (Okla. 1934). 5.

Chillicothe Gazette v. Chillicothe City Schools

2018 Ohio 5445 · Ohio Court of Claims · Dec 26, 2018

Thomas v. … The October 13, 2017 letter merely identifies the general title of the matter being handled, notifies the school board that Liberty Mutual had retained the author to represent the board in that matter, gives contact information