Case law

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1988

THE TERM "INDIRECT INTEREST", SUCH AS USED IN ARTICLE V, SECTION 23, HAS SIMILARLY BEEN VERY LIBERALLY CONSTRUED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THROUGH THE YEARS. … IN ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 79-202, IT WAS OPINED: "A MEMBER OF A WATER BOARD IS "INDIRECTLY INTERESTED" IN A CONTRACT LET BY THE BOARD WHEN A MEMBER HAS OR IS LIKELY TO HAVE A PECUNIARY OR PERSONAL INTEREST IN THE CONTRACT

In re the Estate of Hall

1 Gibb. Surr. 563 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 15, 1896

Hall and I were married there was the same understanding between us, that the money should go to the boards;’ I asked her what boards, and she said the Home Mission Board, *569 the Foreign Mission Board and the Bible Society … Drury v. Smith, 1 P. Wms. 404; Michener v. Dale, 23 Pa. St. 59; Dresser v. Dresser, 46 Mo. 422 ; Jones v. Deyer, 16 Ala. 221 . In Grymes v.

In re Amati ex rel. Magisterial District 27-1-02 Washington County

52 Pa. D. & C.4th 518 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 2001

Respondent was indicted on April 4, 2000 in the case of United States of America v. … No. 701, under the authority vested in this Court by the Pennsylvania Constitution, Article V, Section 18(d)(2), the relief sought by the Board is granted and Respondent is hereby suspended from his judicial office without

Opinion No. 80-169 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 23, 1980

The Oklahoma Group Health and Life Insurance Board, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," 74 O.S. 1303 [ 74-1303 ](2) (1977). The Board is created pursuant to 74 O.S. 1301 [ 74-1301 ] et seq. (1971). … In the case of Ray v.

Case of Jones

1 Armstrong. Election Cases 93 · New York State Assembly · Jan 7, 1830

the statement made by the town canvassers, nor allowed by the said board of county canvassers to the petitioner or any other person, but were duly presented and delivered to the town clerk of 'that town. … V.

Norwich Union Ins. Co. v. Chancellor

5 S.W.2d 494 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 25, 1928

W.[2d] 495): “Appellee sued in the manner provided by statute to set aside an award of the Industrial Accident Board in favor of appellant for loss of an eye, which, he alleged, resulted from an injury sustained while in … Ormsby v. Ratcliffe (Tex. Sup.) 1 S.W.(2d) 1084 ; Bulin v. Smith (Tex. Com. App.) 1 S. W.(2d) 591 .

Quarles, Keith v. FedEx Ground

2018 TN WC 65 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 7, 2018

.: 2017-08-1170 Employee, ) v. ) FedEx Ground, ) State File Number: 39797-2017 … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Burton, Darnell v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water

2019 TN WC 105 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 12, 2019

Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(C)-(D); Miller v. Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 40, at *13 (Oct. 21, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Woodard, Denny v. Freeman Expositions, LLC

2021 TN WC 147 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 16, 2021

Williams v. Saturn Corp., No. M2004-01215-WC- R3-CV, 2005 Tenn. LEXIS 1032, at *6 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Nov. 15, 2005). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1981

OPINION — AG — (1) UNDER ARTICLE V , SECTION 54 OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION, PERSONS PREVIOUSLY REGISTERED TO PRACTICE SOCIAL WORK WHO DO NOT MEET THE NEW REQUIREMENTS OF HOUSE BILL NO. 1901 CODIFIED AS 59 O.S. 1250 [ 59-1250 ] … IN 59 O.S. 1250 [ 59-1250 ] CITE: 59 O.S. 1261 .1 [ 59-1261.1 ], OPINION NO. 80-285, ARTICLE V, SECTION 54 (PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS, REPEAL OF STATUTE — EFFECT) (KAY HARLEY JACOBS)

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 8, 1998

Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980) (citations omitted). ¶ 2 The Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Act is found at 74 O.S. 1991 and Supp. 1997, §§ 1801 -1892. … Midwest City v. Harris, 561 P.2d 1357 , 1358 (Okla. 1977).

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 8, 1995

Irwin v. … Irwin v. Irwin, 433 P.2d at 934 . See also Gordon v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 11, 1978

OPINION — AG — THE PROMULGATION OF REASONABLE RESTRICTIONS ON THE PROFESSIONAL AND ETHICAL CONDUCT OF THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION IS WITHIN THE DELEGATED REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF THE OKLAHOMA BOARD OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTANCY; TO … IN LIGHT OF THE `OHRALIK V.

Melendez, Anana v. Wolfe Co.

2020 TN WC 64 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 6, 2020

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). At this Compensation Hearing, Ms. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

In re the Estate of Winburn

14 Misc. 2d 950 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 5, 1958

The testatrix had another sister Bertha Brown who was not named in the residuary clause and who also predeceased her, leaving two children who have filed objections to the account on the ground that there has been an intestacy … Under these circumstances, the legacies clearly lapsed and pass as in intestacy because of the rule prohibiting the establishment of a residue upon a residue (Wright v. Wright, 225 N. Y. 329 ). The will is so construed.

Fonseca, Edward v. Rimax Contractors, Inc.

2018 TN WC 180 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 2, 2018

Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538, 554-55 (1974). … Reynolds & Co. v.

Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Neatherlin

48 S.W.2d 967 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 28, 1932

The plaintiff in error contended, and the board decided, that there was no liability. … In Petroleum Casualty Co. v.

Grace & Peace Fellowship Church, Inc. v. Cranford Township

4 N.J. Tax 391 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 10, 1982

Board of National Missions, etc. v. Neeld, 9 N.J. 349, 353 , 88 A.2d 500 (1952). The burden is upon the claimant to clearly bring himself within an exemption provision. Ibid. … Olivet Baptist Church v.

Mullis, Sr., Phillip v. Blount County Community Action Agency

2019 TN WC 116 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 30, 2019

McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). For his hernia claim, Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

660 Riverside Drive Aldo Associates L. L. C. v. Marte

178 Misc. 2d 784 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 24, 1998

(Romag Realty Corp. v Saunders, 77 Misc 2d 11 [Civ Ct, NY County 1974]; see also, Milevoi v Alamilla, 107 Misc 2d 493 [Civ Ct, Queens County 1981]; Maguire v Ardea Realty Corp., 279 App Div 904 [1st Dept 1952]; Romanisky … v Siglon Realty Corp., 122 NYS2d 171 [Sup Ct, Bronx County 1953]; Matter of Silver-Ruth Inc. v Rafferty, 42 Misc 2d 926 [Nassau Dist Ct 1964].)