Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.53s
Laymance , Glenda v K-VA-T Food Stores, Inc., dba Food City
2026 TN WC App. 3 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 14, 2026
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Glenda Laymance Docket No. 2024-30-5862 v. … Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009).
Cited 0 timesPublished10 F. Cas. 302 · Pennsylvania Admiralty Court · Jul 1, 1781
The brig Susannah, belonging to George Gibbs, cleared out from the naval office in the port of Rhode Island, and sailed with a cargo on board, as for Hispaniola, but in fact for Turk’s Islands. … See [Vance v. Campbell] 1 Black [66 U. S.] 429.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 8, 2004
See Guyton v. Board of Transportation , 30 N.C. App. 87 , 226 S.E.2d 175 (1976). … See Guyton v. Board of Transportation , 30 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedElk Realty Co. v. Town of Nutley
18 N.J. Misc. 691 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 12, 1940
See Trenton Lodge No. 105, Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks v. City of Trenton, 18 N. J. Mis. R. 513; 15 Atl. Rep. (2d) 97 (State Board, 1940). … The judgment of the Essex County Board is reversed, and the assessment ordered canceled.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFreeman, Joshua v. Certified Maintenance Service, Inc.
2023 TN WC App. 14 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 29, 2023
Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).
Cited 0 timesPublished153 Misc. 395 · New York Court of Claims · Nov 5, 1934
So far as liability for interference with such waters is concerned, it was said in Dillon v. … (See, also, Flanigan v. State, 113 Misc. 91 ; Thompson v. Board of Education, 124 id. 840.)
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 25, 1973
who is a member of said governing board. … Spearman v. Williams, Okl., 415 P.2d 597 , Matthews v. Board of Education of Town of Irvington, N.J., 106 A.2d 346 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 23, 1968
In the case of City of Tahlequah ex rel Johnson v. … Your second question involves the exercise of discretion by an executive board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorwich Union Indemnity Co. v. Wilson
67 S.W.2d 225 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 24, 1934
It becomes proper to add that the fact is undisputed that, when Wilson filed his claim with the Industrial Accident Board, more than 6 months after he sustained said injuries had elapsed. … Ass’n v. Henson (Tex. Com. App.) 52 S.W.(2d) 247 ; *227 Ocean Accident & Guaranty Corp. v. McCall (Tex. Com. App.) 45 S.W.(2d) 178 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedBECKMAN, NENA v. MANHEIM TENNESSEE, LLC
2026 TN WC 88 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 24, 2026
Frye v. Vincent Printing Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 34, at *15 (Aug. 2, 2016). … Beene v. Metro Servs., Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *7 (Jan. 12, 2017).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 25, 1996
Darnell v. Chrysler, 687 P.2d 132 , 134 (Okla. 1984). ¶ 4 Subsection 6 specifically provides for proration in the event the funds appropriated for the purpose of paying the midterm supplement are not sufficient. … This question has been answered by the Supreme Court in Fair School Finance Council of Oklahoma v. State, 746 P.2d 1135 (Okla. 1987).
Cited 0 timesPublished154 Misc. 2d 17 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Jan 18, 1991
cooperation agreement between prosecution and a key witness that his testimony against the defendant would be communicated to the Parole Board]; cf., People v Fappiano, 134 Misc 2d 693 [Sup Ct, Kings County 1987], affd 139 … Agurs, 427 US 97, 106 [1976], supra; People v Brown, 67 NY2d 555, 559 [1986]; People v Cwikla, 46 NY2d, supra, at 441-442.)
Cited 6 timesPublishedIn re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of McDowell
17 Mills Surr. 515 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 15, 1916
(Fritz v. City Trust Co., 72 App. Div. 532 ; Bascom v. Weed, 53 Misc. Rep. 508 ; Ridgeley v. Johnson, 11 Barb. 527 .) … Y. 363 ; Hurlburt v. Durant, 88 id. 121; Cluff v. Day, 124 id. 195; Olcott v. Baldwin, 190 id. 99; Matter of Kellogg, 214 id. 460.) Counsel for the executors rely on the decision in Matter of Kellogg ( 214 N.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCarter, Paulette v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
2020 TN WC App. 33 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 6, 2020
Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublished171 A.3d 367 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2016
OPINION BY JUDGE DAVID BARTON Respondent Kenneth Miller (Respondent Miller), a former Senior Magisterial District Judge, appears before this Court in response to a Complaint filed by the Judicial Conduct Board. … Article V, § 18(a) of the Pennsylvania Constitution grants to the Judicial Conduct Board the authority to determine whether there is probable cause to File formal charges against a judicial officer, in this Court, and thereafter
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1975
Attorney General v. Huston, 27 Okl. 606 , 113 P. 190 and State v. District Court of Bryan County, Okl., 290 P.2d 413 . In construing Article VI, Section 1 State ex rel. Attorney General v. … In the case of State v. District Court of Bryan County, Okl., 290 P.2d 413 , the Court indirectly touched on the matter of a board meeting at a place other than the seat of government.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1989
THE TERM "INDIRECT INTEREST", SUCH AS USED IN ARTICLE V, SECTION 23, HAS SIMILARLY BEEN VERY LIBERALLY CONSTRUED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THROUGH THE YEARS. … IN ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 79-202, IT WAS OPINED: "A MEMBER OF A WATER BOARD IS "INDIRECTLY INTERESTED" IN A CONTRACT LET BY THE BOARD WHEN A MEMBER HAS OR IS LIKELY TO HAVE A PECUNIARY OR PERSONAL INTEREST IN THE CONTRACT
Cited 0 timesPublished2016 TN WC 292 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 6, 2016
Specifically, the Appeals Board wrote it had "no difficulty finding the trial court's determinations are supported by a preponderance of the evidence." Raine v. … Rye v. Women's Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPayne, Tracy v. D and D Electric
2014 TN WC App. 6 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 17, 2014
Clay County Manor, Inc. v. State of Tennessee, 849 S.W.2d 755, 759 (Tenn. 1993) (quoting Southern Railway Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196, 199 (Tenn. 1984)). … Simpson v. Satterfield, 564 S.W.2d 953, 955 (Tenn. 1978).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJones, Alfrend v. F S Sperry Co., Inc.
2021 TN WC 210 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 5, 2021
Watson v. City of Jackson, 448 S.W.3d 919, 926 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna