Case law

Opinion No. 77-197 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1978

You further refer this office to the Supreme Court decision of Cox v. … Dillingham, supra, in order to avoid the necessity of a hearing before the County Board of Equalization and appeal therefrom. In distinguishing the Cox et al. v.

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1999

Under the Act, the State Board of Corrections ("the Board") first certifies the capacity of the prison system. … Turner v.

Opinion No. 73-308 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 1974

sold and issued to eligible recipients of the county in pursuance of an agreement for such purpose entered into by the board with the Oklahoma Public Welfare Commission. … It is well settled that state boards and commissions as creatures of the law have only such powers as are granted by the law. See Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 .

Heath v. State

199 Misc. 104 · New York Court of Claims · Sep 15, 1950

(New York State) Eating Board respectively considered that it was unnecessary and I so Find.” … The board’s decision was thereafter affirmed by the Appellate Division, Third Department (Matter of Fortner v. Heath, 274 App. Div. 958 ).

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 1989

Simons v. Benson, 244 P.2d 1126 (Okla. 1952). … Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v.

Reazkallah, Maikel v. Amazon.com Services, LLC

2024 TN WC App. 14 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 25, 2024

Employee did send an email to the Clerk of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, which appears to reiterate his request to have Dr. … State v. Banks, 271 S.W.3d 90, 116 (Tenn. 2008). We can find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s exclusion of Dr. Burleson’s C-32. See Henderson v.

McCullough v. Moss

5 Denio 567 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1846

The concurrence of a majority of the board, when duly assembled, is requisite to constitute a valid act. The assent of the several members separately is not enough. (Livingston v. Lynch, 4 John. Ch. Rep. 596, 597.) … The rule on this subject was" properly laid down by Juáticé JeWett, in Hodge's v.

Guatemala, Concepcion v. Tyson Food, Inc.

2020 TN WC 83 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 31, 2020

Petty v. Convention Prod. Rigging, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. 95, at *18-19 (Dec. 29, 2016). Here, Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Islet Scis., Inc. v. Brighthaven Ventures, LLC

2017 NCBC 4 · North Carolina Business Court · Jan 12, 2017

On October 25, 2013, Islet’s board appointed Green as CEO and Wilkison as COO of Islet. … Bluebird Corp. v. Aubin, 188 N.C.

Parker, Sharon v. Ozark Motor Lines, Inc.

2020 TN WC 84 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 3, 2020

Code Ann. § 20-16-101; see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Ozark meets this burden, Ms. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Tan Holding Corp. v. Wallace

178 Misc. 2d 900 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Nov 13, 1998

Although application to the Loft Board seeking IMD status for the building may not be timely, the courts have concurrent jurisdiction with the Loft Board to determine IMD status. … (Metzendorf v 130 W. 57 Co., 132 AD2d 262, 265 [1st Dept 1987], citing Mandel v Pitkowsky, 102 Misc 2d 478 , affd 76 AD2d 807 .)

Opinion No. 71-395 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 17, 1972

In the case of Boydston v. … In the case of Lairmore, et al. v.

Cunningham, Wendy v. Trustpoint Hospital, LLC

2022 TN WC 33 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 8, 2022

.: 2019-05-1358 Employee, ) v. ) ) TRUSTPOINT HOSPITAL, LLC, ) State File No.: … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

In re the Estate of Riggs

158 Misc. 95 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 20, 1935

(Wood *96 bridge v. Bockes, 170 N. Y. 596 ; Weeks v. Frankel, 197 id. 304; Brown v. Spohr, 180 id. 201.) The application to dispense with the appointment of a successor trustee is, therefore, denied.

In re the Estate of Tims

7 Mills Surr. 140 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1909

Warner v. Durant, 76 N. Y. 133 ; Matter of Baer, 147 id. 348. This rule, however, has many exceptions and is seldom alone relied upon (Clark v. Cammann, 160 N. … Goebel v. Wolf, supra.

VESTAL, COLTON v. TBDN TENNESSEE CO.

2026 TN WC 84 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 18, 2026

Patterson v. Huff & Puff Trucking, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 33, at *9 (July 6, 2018). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Thompson

4 Mills Surr. 10 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1903

Fowler v. Lockwood, 3 Redf. 465; Du Bois v. Brown, 1 Dem. 317 ; Gibbons v. … Du Bois v. Brown, 1 Dem. 317 .

Opinion No. (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 23, 2007

Supp.2007, § 1414 in budget board counties. See A. G . Opin. 07-6 (describing in detail non-budget board counties and budget board counties). … DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General of Oklahoma JAMES V.

Vodafone Americas Inc. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

991 N.E.2d 626 · Indiana Tax Court · Jun 18, 2013

See also May Dep’t Stores v. Indiana Dep't of State Revenue, 749 N.E.2d 651, 655-57 (Ind. … Kelsey v. Kelsey, 714 N.E.2d 187, 190-91 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (citation omitted).

Hoyle v. Carolina Associated Mills

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 15, 1994

Brown made no findings as to the problems that he found that were related to her October 9, 1986 injury, but instead his notes states "recurrent disc." 7. Dr. Brown referred plaintiff to Dr. … Hendrix v. Linn-Corriher Corp. 317 N.C. 179 (1986) 2.