Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.77s
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Leibowitz
144 Misc. 611 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 27, 1932
(Martin v. Funk, 75 N. Y. 134 ; Matter of Totten, 179 id. 112; Matter of Brown, 252 id. 366.) I find that the bonds in question are the property of the respective object-ants named upon each bond as the beneficiary.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 12, 1988
THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION REGULATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION AND HANDBOOK ON BUDGETING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT BULLETIN NO. 145-V, AND SPECIFICALLY SECTION II OF THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION STATE, IN PERTINENT … SEE BROOKS V. WOODS, 640 P.2D 1000, AT 1002 (OKLA. APP. 1981). IN LINE WITH THIS REASONING, CHARGING A FEE FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF STUDENTS WHICH LIVE WITHIN THE DISTANCE IN QUESTION DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE PROHIBITED.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 1980
Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 (Okla. 1973); Boydston v. State, 277 P.2d 138 (Okla. 1955). … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 (Okla. 1964).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMassachusetts Land Court · Aug 27, 2021
Pierce v. Bd. of Appeals of Carver, 369 Mass. 804 , 808 (1976); see also O'Blenes v. Zoning Bd. of Lynn, 397 Mass. 555 , 558 (1986) ; Cappuccio v. Zoning Bd. of Spencer, 398 Mass. 304 , 309-312 (1986); Halko v. … Corp. v. Planning Bd. of Auburn, 32 Mass. App. Ct. 319 , 322-323 (1992); County of Norfolk v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Walpole, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 930 (1983).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBriggs v. State Tax Commission
2 Or. Tax 162 · Oregon Tax Court · Jun 17, 1965
He shall preside at all meetings of the Board of Directors and stockholders. … However, in that case plaintiff was not only president of the corporation but the majority stockholder, chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer. In Bloom v. U.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 4, 2011
Brown noted an abrasion to the left lateral abdomen, and a minimal abrasion to the left knee. Mr. Brown prescribed medications and ordered Plaintiff out of work for three days. 4. … Stat. § 97-25 ; Parsons v. The Pantry, Inc. , 126 N.C. App. 540 , 485 S.E.2d 867 (1997); Perez v. American Airlines/AMR Corp. , 174 N.C. App. 128 , 620 S.E.2d 288 (2005); Adams v. Metals USA , 168 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedThomas, Alisha v. Federal Express Corp.
2020 TN WC App. 27 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 8, 2020
Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010). … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAbdelshahaed, Reazkallah v. Taylor Fresh Foods, Inc.
2022 TN WC 82 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 21, 2022
Love v. Delta Faucet Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 45, at *15- 16 (Sept. 19, 2016). Similarly, parties cannot rely solely on their own medical interpretations to support their arguments. Lurz v. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAdiole v. Logan Senior Care, LLC
2019 TN WC App. 54 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 16, 2019
Martin v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 271 S.W.3d 76, 83 (Tenn. 2008). … Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, PLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTown of Morristown v. Womans Club of Morristown
10 N.J. Tax 309 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 5, 1989
The. taxing district challenged the action of the assessor before the Morris County Board of Taxation and has the right to seek review of the Board’s action in the Tax Court. … Turnpike Authority v.
Reversed on other grounds by Town of Morristown v. Woman's Club, 242 N.J. Super. 654 (1990)Cited 4 timesPublished2018 NCBC 26 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 2, 2018
Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, and Lorillard. (Id.) 6. Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, Lorillard, and the Settling States executed a Master Settlement Agreement (the “MSA”). … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGibson, William v. Dawn of Hope Development Center, Inc.
2018 TN WC 176 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 24, 2018
Payne v. D and D Elec., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 21, at *12 (May 4, 2016). … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJim Fisher Motors, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
7 Or. Tax 90 · Oregon Tax Court · Mar 14, 1977
Rogue River Pack. v. Dept. of Rev., 6 OTR 293 (1976). … The power of the board is limited to determinations of value. ORS 309.038 and 309.040. University v. Multnomah Co., 31 Or 498 , 50 P 532 (1897). The "order” dated July 18, 1975, proved to be Mr.
Cited 4 timesPublishedAdams, Pamela v. LHC Group, a/k/a SunCrest Companion Services
2024 TN WC 36 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 25, 2024
Berdnik v. Fairfield Glade Com’ty Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *16 (May 18, 2017). Ms. Adams’s sole proof—Dr. … Hackney v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGehin-Scott v. Willingboro Township
1 N.J. Tax 546 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 30, 1980
Auth. v. … Switz v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedYuckman v. Ohio Univ. Lancaster
2011 Ohio 7032 · Ohio Court of Claims · Dec 20, 2011
[Cite as Yuckman v. Ohio Univ. Lancaster, 2011-Ohio-7032.] … Plaintiff v. OHIO UNIVERSITY-LANCASTER Defendant Case No. 2009-08136 Judge Joseph T. Clark Magistrate Lewis F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1980
The pertinent part of this provision is: "* * * The board shall, for the purposes stated in this paragraph, advertise for bids on any such bulk item to be purchased where the amount involved will exceed One Thousand Five … Woods v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 207 Okl. 490 , 251 P.2d 505 (1953). This merely means that the materials must be procured from the successful bidder.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJones, Jeffrey v. Columbus McKinnon Corp.
2019 TN WC App. 42 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 10, 2019
v. … OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Jeffrey Jones ) Docket No. 2019-01-0024
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 14, 1978
In this same subsection, we find a provision for the exercise of an elector's vote by a corporation when its board of directors has so authorized by resolution filed with the judge of the election. … may not be expanded by construction, Ridley Packing Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedReazkallah, Maikel v. Imperial Guard & Detective Service, Inc.
2019 TN WC 103 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 10, 2019
FILED Jul 10, 2019 01:13 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF CLAIMS TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE Maikel Reazkallah, ) Docket No. 2018-06-2210 Employee, ) v. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna