Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.41s
SITC Inc. v. Riverplace I Holdings LLC
23 Misc. 3d 219 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 30, 2008
The leases executed between the parties were standard form of apartment leases, issued by the Real Estate Board of New York, form number A1/88/A. … no need to restore respondent to possession simply to be subject to eviction after a writ of assistance was obtained and executed (see also Brown v 165 Conover Assoc., 5 Misc 3d 128[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51244[U] [App Term
Cited 1 timesPublishedWeddington, Jason v. Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC
2020 TN WC App. 41 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 1, 2020
Martin v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 271 S.W.3d 76, 83 (Tenn. 2008). … Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, PLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHancock, Jurine v. Federal Express Corporation, et al.
2018 TN WC App. 45 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 11, 2018
APPEALS BOARD Jurine Hancock ) Docket No. 2017-08-1354 ) v. ) State File No. 938 … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFields v. Trustees of Princeton University
28 N.J. Tax 574 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 5, 2015
Ctr. v. … “The burden of persuading the Tax Court that a tax exemption is merited is on the claimant ‘even when the county board has granted exemption and the appeal is by the municipality.’ ” Borough of Hamburg v.
Cited 4 timesPublished102 S.W.2d 1055 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 17, 1937
In construing that section this court held in Brown v. … . * * * ” In the case of Mooers v. Hunter (Tex.Com.App.) 67 S.W.(2d) 860 , the construction given that section in the Brown v. Fore Case was reaffirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Leibowitz
144 Misc. 611 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 27, 1932
(Martin v. Funk, 75 N. Y. 134 ; Matter of Totten, 179 id. 112; Matter of Brown, 252 id. 366.) I find that the bonds in question are the property of the respective object-ants named upon each bond as the beneficiary.
Cited 2 timesPublishedKassmieh, Michael v. NEIS, Inc.
2019 TN WC 83 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 23, 2019
See, Joiner v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd., LEXIS 54, at *21 (Sept. 14, 2018). In this case, Dr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished7 Mills Surr. 140 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1909
Warner v. Durant, 76 N. Y. 133 ; Matter of Baer, 147 id. 348. This rule, however, has many exceptions and is seldom alone relied upon (Clark v. Cammann, 160 N. … Goebel v. Wolf, supra.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMassachusetts Land Court · Aug 27, 2021
Pierce v. Bd. of Appeals of Carver, 369 Mass. 804 , 808 (1976); see also O'Blenes v. Zoning Bd. of Lynn, 397 Mass. 555 , 558 (1986) ; Cappuccio v. Zoning Bd. of Spencer, 398 Mass. 304 , 309-312 (1986); Halko v. … Corp. v. Planning Bd. of Auburn, 32 Mass. App. Ct. 319 , 322-323 (1992); County of Norfolk v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Walpole, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 930 (1983).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMitchell, Dwight v. Randstad North America
2016 TN WC 232 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 5, 2016
Mitchell appealed, but the Tennessee Workers Compensation Appeals Board affirmed. … Our Appeals Board held that self-represented litigants "must comply with the same standards to which lawyers must adhere." Burnette v. K-Mart Corp., No. 2014-02- 0020, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 2, at *6 (Tenn.
Cited 0 timesPublishedThomas, Alisha v. Federal Express Corp.
2020 TN WC App. 27 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 8, 2020
Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010). … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAbdelshahaed, Reazkallah v. Taylor Fresh Foods, Inc.
2022 TN WC 82 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 21, 2022
Love v. Delta Faucet Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 45, at *15- 16 (Sept. 19, 2016). Similarly, parties cannot rely solely on their own medical interpretations to support their arguments. Lurz v. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAdiole v. Logan Senior Care, LLC
2019 TN WC App. 54 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 16, 2019
Martin v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 271 S.W.3d 76, 83 (Tenn. 2008). … Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, PLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublished27 Misc. 2d 422 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1961
Petitioner cities Burke v. Brown ( 180 Misc. 903 , affd. 266 App. … Brown (supra), the defendant Brown moved to vacate a demand for a bill of particulars on the law alone and made no claim of inability to furnish the particulars requested.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 4, 2011
Brown noted an abrasion to the left lateral abdomen, and a minimal abrasion to the left knee. Mr. Brown prescribed medications and ordered Plaintiff out of work for three days. 4. … Stat. § 97-25 ; Parsons v. The Pantry, Inc. , 126 N.C. App. 540 , 485 S.E.2d 867 (1997); Perez v. American Airlines/AMR Corp. , 174 N.C. App. 128 , 620 S.E.2d 288 (2005); Adams v. Metals USA , 168 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedReazkallah, Maikel v. Imperial Guard & Detective Service, Inc.
2019 TN WC 103 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 10, 2019
FILED Jul 10, 2019 01:13 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF CLAIMS TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE Maikel Reazkallah, ) Docket No. 2018-06-2210 Employee, ) v. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished16 Abb. Pr. 457 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1874
Minchin, 7 Vesey, 196; Langford v. Gascoyne, 11 Id., 333; Robertson v. Armstrong, 28 Beav., 123). Mr. Brown recognizes his liability for the other loss of six thousand dollars. … The common-law doctrine has thus been abrogated (Hawley v. Ross, 7 Paige, 103 ; Glen v. Gibson, 9 Barb., 634 ; Bunn v. Vaughan, 1 Abb. Ct. App. Dec., 253 ; Milbank v. Crane, 25 How. Pr., 193 ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTysons Associates v. Tribeca Audio Research Inc.
140 Misc. 2d 38 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 23, 1988
Co. v Kagan, NYLJ, Oct. 6, 1987, at 14, col 1 [App Term, 1st Dept].) … Seafood City, 67 Misc 2d 625 , revd on other grounds 71 Misc 2d 302 ; Finkelstein v Reyes, 75 Misc 2d 340 ; also see, Ying Lung Corp. v Medrano, 123 Misc 2d 1074 .)
Cited 1 timesPublishedStallion, Samuel v. Trugreen, L.P.
2016 TN WC 301 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 13, 2016
In Sanker v. Nacarato Trucks, Inc., No. 2016-06-0101, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 27 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. … In White v. Boles Trucking, No. 2016-04-0074, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 86, at *7-8 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 2002
See Bd. of County Comm'rs v. … (citation omitted); Bd. of County Comm'rs v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna