Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.41s

  • SITC Inc. v. Riverplace I Holdings LLC

    23 Misc. 3d 219 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 30, 2008

    The leases executed between the parties were standard form of apartment leases, issued by the Real Estate Board of New York, form number A1/88/A. … no need to restore respondent to possession simply to be subject to eviction after a writ of assistance was obtained and executed (see also Brown v 165 Conover Assoc., 5 Misc 3d 128[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51244[U] [App Term

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Weddington, Jason v. Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC

    2020 TN WC App. 41 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 1, 2020

    Martin v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 271 S.W.3d 76, 83 (Tenn. 2008). … Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, PLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hancock, Jurine v. Federal Express Corporation, et al.

    2018 TN WC App. 45 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 11, 2018

    APPEALS BOARD Jurine Hancock ) Docket No. 2017-08-1354 ) v. ) State File No. 938 … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fields v. Trustees of Princeton University

    28 N.J. Tax 574 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 5, 2015

    Ctr. v. … “The burden of persuading the Tax Court that a tax exemption is merited is on the claimant ‘even when the county board has granted exemption and the appeal is by the municipality.’ ” Borough of Hamburg v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hollis v. Tarrant County

    102 S.W.2d 1055 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 17, 1937

    In construing that section this court held in Brown v. … . * * * ” In the case of Mooers v. Hunter (Tex.Com.App.) 67 S.W.(2d) 860 , the construction given that section in the Brown v. Fore Case was reaffirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Leibowitz

    144 Misc. 611 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 27, 1932

    (Martin v. Funk, 75 N. Y. 134 ; Matter of Totten, 179 id. 112; Matter of Brown, 252 id. 366.) I find that the bonds in question are the property of the respective object-ants named upon each bond as the beneficiary.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kassmieh, Michael v. NEIS, Inc.

    2019 TN WC 83 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 23, 2019

    See, Joiner v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd., LEXIS 54, at *21 (Sept. 14, 2018). In this case, Dr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Tims

    7 Mills Surr. 140 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1909

    Warner v. Durant, 76 N. Y. 133 ; Matter of Baer, 147 id. 348. This rule, however, has many exceptions and is seldom alone relied upon (Clark v. Cammann, 160 N. … Goebel v. Wolf, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Barry v. Consolati

    Massachusetts Land Court · Aug 27, 2021

    Pierce v. Bd. of Appeals of Carver, 369 Mass. 804 , 808 (1976); see also O'Blenes v. Zoning Bd. of Lynn, 397 Mass. 555 , 558 (1986) ; Cappuccio v. Zoning Bd. of Spencer, 398 Mass. 304 , 309-312 (1986); Halko v. … Corp. v. Planning Bd. of Auburn, 32 Mass. App. Ct. 319 , 322-323 (1992); County of Norfolk v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Walpole, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 930 (1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mitchell, Dwight v. Randstad North America

    2016 TN WC 232 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 5, 2016

    Mitchell appealed, but the Tennessee Workers Compensation Appeals Board affirmed. … Our Appeals Board held that self-represented litigants "must comply with the same standards to which lawyers must adhere." Burnette v. K-Mart Corp., No. 2014-02- 0020, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 2, at *6 (Tenn.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas, Alisha v. Federal Express Corp.

    2020 TN WC App. 27 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 8, 2020

    Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010). … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Abdelshahaed, Reazkallah v. Taylor Fresh Foods, Inc.

    2022 TN WC 82 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 21, 2022

    Love v. Delta Faucet Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 45, at *15- 16 (Sept. 19, 2016). Similarly, parties cannot rely solely on their own medical interpretations to support their arguments. Lurz v. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Adiole v. Logan Senior Care, LLC

    2019 TN WC App. 54 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 16, 2019

    Martin v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 271 S.W.3d 76, 83 (Tenn. 2008). … Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, PLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Lombardi

    27 Misc. 2d 422 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1961

    Petitioner cities Burke v. Brown ( 180 Misc. 903 , affd. 266 App. … Brown (supra), the defendant Brown moved to vacate a demand for a bill of particulars on the law alone and made no claim of inability to furnish the particulars requested.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Garrett v. Big Lots, Inc.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 4, 2011

    Brown noted an abrasion to the left lateral abdomen, and a minimal abrasion to the left knee. Mr. Brown prescribed medications and ordered Plaintiff out of work for three days. 4. … Stat. § 97-25 ; Parsons v. The Pantry, Inc. , 126 N.C. App. 540 , 485 S.E.2d 867 (1997); Perez v. American Airlines/AMR Corp. , 174 N.C. App. 128 , 620 S.E.2d 288 (2005); Adams v. Metals USA , 168 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reazkallah, Maikel v. Imperial Guard & Detective Service, Inc.

    2019 TN WC 103 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 10, 2019

    FILED Jul 10, 2019 01:13 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF CLAIMS TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE Maikel Reazkallah, ) Docket No. 2018-06-2210 Employee, ) v. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown's Accounting

    16 Abb. Pr. 457 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1874

    Minchin, 7 Vesey, 196; Langford v. Gascoyne, 11 Id., 333; Robertson v. Armstrong, 28 Beav., 123). Mr. Brown recognizes his liability for the other loss of six thousand dollars. … The common-law doctrine has thus been abrogated (Hawley v. Ross, 7 Paige, 103 ; Glen v. Gibson, 9 Barb., 634 ; Bunn v. Vaughan, 1 Abb. Ct. App. Dec., 253 ; Milbank v. Crane, 25 How. Pr., 193 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tysons Associates v. Tribeca Audio Research Inc.

    140 Misc. 2d 38 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 23, 1988

    Co. v Kagan, NYLJ, Oct. 6, 1987, at 14, col 1 [App Term, 1st Dept].) … Seafood City, 67 Misc 2d 625 , revd on other grounds 71 Misc 2d 302 ; Finkelstein v Reyes, 75 Misc 2d 340 ; also see, Ying Lung Corp. v Medrano, 123 Misc 2d 1074 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stallion, Samuel v. Trugreen, L.P.

    2016 TN WC 301 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 13, 2016

    In Sanker v. Nacarato Trucks, Inc., No. 2016-06-0101, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 27 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. … In White v. Boles Trucking, No. 2016-04-0074, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 86, at *7-8 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2002)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 2002

    See Bd. of County Comm'rs v. … (citation omitted); Bd. of County Comm'rs v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.