Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.41s

  • Opinion No. 77-126 (1977) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 31, 1977

    In the case of Morrison v. … The case of Robinson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hopson, Cecilia v. Travelers Property Cas. Corp.

    2022 TN WC 41 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 11, 2022

    Hancock v. Vanderbilt Univ. Med. Ctr., 2022 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *7-8 (Jan. 5, 2022). … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 74-194 (1974) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1974

    The Board of Examiners in Optometry v. John G. … The Board of Examiners in Optometry v. John G.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Accounting of Wind

    1 Misc. 2d 260 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 5, 1955

    (Real Property Law, § 92; 1 Scott on Trusts § 99.3; Matter of Reed v. Browne, 295 N. Y. 184 .) For this reason the decree granting letters testamentary directed the widow to furnish a bond (Surrogate’s Ct. … Y. 196 ; Matter of Brittain, supra; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Leach, 168 Misc. 526 ; Matter of Wilmerding, 135 Misc. 674 ; Matter of Maloney, 120 Misc. 456 ; Matter of McDowell, 102 Misc. 275 ; mod. 193 App.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1992)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 18, 1992

    INSTEAD, ALL SICK LEAVE BENEFITS ARE DISCUSSED IN TERMS OF THE MINIMUM AMOUNT A BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY OFFER THE TEACHERS. … JACKSON V. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. NO. 16 OF PAYNE COUNTY, 648 P.2D 26, 29 (OKLA.1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bach, Evan v. Lynn Fogleman Construction

    2018 TN WC 195 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 4, 2018

    McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Mr. … The Appeals Board previously noted that judges are not well-suited to make independent medical determinations without expert medical testimony supporting such a determination. See Scott v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Manzanillo

    145 Misc. 2d 504 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Oct 24, 1989

    (See, People v Maynard, 80 Misc 2d 279 [Sup Ct, NY County 1974]; People v Lowe, 96 Misc 2d 33 [Crim Ct, Bronx County 1978].) … [People v De Jesus, 69 NY2d 855 (1987), supra.])

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • BURKES, JERRY R. v. SYSCO CORPORATION

    2025 TN WC 50 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 1, 2025

    Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). He must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to the requested benefits. Tenn. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1988

    WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO YOUR INQUIRIES, YOU ASK WHETHER A MEMBER OF THE LOCAL MUNICIPAL GOVERNING BOARD MAY VALIDLY PLACE INTO NOMINATION AND/OR VOTE UPON THE APPOINTMENT OF A MEMBER OF THE LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD … SEE, E.Q., BOARDMAN V. OKLAHOMA CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, 445 P.2D 412 (OKLA. 1968); ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 79-303.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • GANDY, TERRY v. MARTEN TRANSPORT, LIMITED

    2025 TN WC 86 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 2, 2025

    Flowers v. South Cent. Bell Tel. Co., 672 S.W.2d 769, 770 (Tenn. 1984). Thus, an employee is entitled to benefits if the employee’s work causes an actual progression or advances a preexisting condition. See Hill v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sevilla-Palma, Norvin v. Wauford Air Conditioning, Inc.

    2016 TN WC App. 40 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 30, 2016

    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Norvin Sevilla-Palma ) Docket No. 2016-05-0242 ) v. … WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Norvin Sevilla-Palma ) Docket No. 2016-05-0242 ) v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Fredenthal

    25 Misc. 2d 1068 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 27, 1960

    Klug, supra; Kernochan v. Murray, 111 N. Y. 306 ). … Y. 527 ; Matter of Brown, 153 Misc. 282 ; Matter of Van Hoecke, 197 Misc. 339 , affd. 277 App. Div. 832 ; Matter of Colaci, 288 N. Y. 158 ).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 79-032 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 26, 1979

    This office is in receipt of your letter dated January 24, 1979, wherein you ask the Attorney General for an opinion regarding the following questions: Is the Oklahoma State Board of Public Accountancy required to deliberate … discussing the above section's applicability to the need to have the public's business conducted in the open, and the principal of attorney confidentiality, the Supreme Court in Oklahoma Association of Municipal Attorneys v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Salters, Alexis v. Healthchannels, LLC d/b/a Scribe America

    2020 TN WC 115 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 28, 2020

    To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1. … The appealing party has fifieen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Woodrum Truck Lines v. Bailey

    57 S.W.2d 92 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 15, 1933

    Co. v. Cluck, 97 Tex. 181 , 77 S. W. 403 , 64 L. R. A. 494, 104 Am. St. Rep. 863 , 1 Ann. Cas. 261, Judge Brown calls attention to such repeal of the right of view under the common law. In Lovett v. State, 87 Tex. Cr. … R. v. Brown (Tex. Com. App.) 228 S. W. 915 ; Letsinger v. Panhandle & S. E. R. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 286 S. W. 1107 ; Southern Traction Co. v. Wilson (Tex. Com. App.) 254 S. W. 1104 .

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Wake Cty.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 3, 2005

    Lemly v. Colvard Oil Co. , 157 N.C. App. 99 , 577 S.E.2d 712 (2003). … Therefore, under Lemly v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Weddington, Jason v. Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC

    2020 TN WC App. 41 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 1, 2020

    Martin v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 271 S.W.3d 76, 83 (Tenn. 2008). … Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, PLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harden v. Department of Professional Regulation

    18 Fla. Supp. 2d 212 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Mar 4, 1986

    In McDonald v. … In Hill v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 16, 1991

    HOWEVER, THE PRESIDENT OF THE CORPORATION ALSO SITS ON A STATE BOARD. IN A.G. OPIN. … CLEARLY, SUCH A DEFINITION WOULD INCLUDE A MEMBER OF A STATE BOARD.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Bogan

    129 Misc. 119 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 17, 1927

    (Hodgman v. Cobb, 202 App. Div. 259 ; Brown v. Spohr, 180 N. Y. 201 .) In this instance there is no express gift to the executors and no directions for them to apply the income to the use of any one. (Snedeker v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.