Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.56s

  • Maples, David ( McClain, Codi) v. Professional Personnel Services

    2021 TN WC 172 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 12, 2021

    Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2020); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Professional Personnel satisfies one of those burdens, Mr. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Stocum's Will

    94 N.Y.S. 588 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 8, 1905

    Stuart v. Brown, 11 App. Div. 492 , 42 N. Y. Supp. 365 . … Stuart v. Brown, supra. As stated in this case, there are no great-grandchildren, but there are grandchildren, and the case is quite similar to that of In re Davis (R. I. 1896) 35 Atl. 1046 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-254 (1973) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 25, 1973

    who is a member of said governing board. … Spearman v. Williams, Okl., 415 P.2d 597 , Matthews v. Board of Education of Town of Irvington, N.J., 106 A.2d 346 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Accounting of Public Administrator of Kings County

    25 Misc. 3d 236 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 10, 2009

    supervise the fees attorneys charge for legal services even though same are agreed upon or are unchallenged by the parties to the proceeding and notwithstanding the existence of a retainer agreement (see Matter of Stortecky v … (Guideline of Administrative Board for Offices of Public Administrators Pursuant to Sur *241 rogate’s Court Procedure Act Section 1128 [approved by Board Mar. 20, 2006].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Estate of Frankel v. Borough of Hillsdale

    10 N.J. Tax 213 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 29, 1988

    Newark v. Fischer, 3 N.J. 488 , 70 A.2d 733 (1950); Danis v. Middlesex Cty. Bd. of Tax, 113 N.J.Super. 6 , 272 A.2d 542 (App.Div.1971); Mayfair Holding Corp. v. North Bergen Tp., 4 N.J.Tax 38 (Tax Ct.1982). … Clairol v. Kingsley, 109 N.J.Super. 22 , 262 A.2d 213 (App.Div.), aff'd 57 N.J. 199 , 270 A.2d 702 (1970); Sun Life Assur. of Canada v. Orange, 2 N.J.Tax 25 (Tax Ct.1980).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McBride, Angela v. McMinnville Boarding, Home for the Elderly, Inc.

    2018 TN WC 135 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 31, 2018

    Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(l) (2017); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). To prevail on causation, Ms. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frausto, Alejandra v. Marketing & Sales Mgmt., Corp.

    2021 TN WC 173 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 14, 2021

    See Baker v. Electrolux, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 65, at *7-10 (Oct. 20, 2017). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 74-188 (1975) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1975

    Attorney General v. Huston, 27 Okl. 606 , 113 P. 190 and State v. District Court of Bryan County, Okl., 290 P.2d 413 . In construing Article VI, Section 1 State ex rel. Attorney General v. … In the case of State v. District Court of Bryan County, Okl., 290 P.2d 413 , the Court indirectly touched on the matter of a board meeting at a place other than the seat of government.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Autoliv North America v. Department of Local Government Finance

    784 N.E.2d 593 · Indiana Tax Court · Mar 6, 2003

    Damico v. Dep't of Local Gov't Fin., 769 N.E.2d 715, 719 (Ind. Tax Ct.2002). … Typically, a taxpayer seeking to deduct the cost of special tools must first prove thai its tools satisfy the State Board's definition of special tools. See Standard Plastic Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Duncan v. Guilford Cty. B.O.E.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 19, 2005

    Lemly v. Colvard Oil Co ., 157 N.C. App. 99 , 577 S.E.2d 712 (2003). 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Weston

    6 Mills Surr. 518 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1908

    Gove v. Harris, 4 Dem. 293 . … Y. 464 ; Matter of O’Neil, 91 id. 523 ; Cook v. White, 43 App. Div. 393 , affd. 167 N. Y. 588 ; Matter of Carll, 38 Misc. Rep. 474 -5; Matter of Emmons, 110 App. Div. 701 . In Brown v. Clark, 77 N.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of the of the Will of Alden

    9 Mills Surr. 46 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1912

    This same rule of law is recognized in O’Brien v. Jackson, 167 N. Y. 31 . It is, therefore, apparent that, if the claimant has a claim for board and care of John S. … . *50 In Skidmore v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Raine, David v. White Castle

    2016 TN WC 292 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 6, 2016

    Specifically, the Appeals Board wrote it had "no difficulty finding the trial court's determinations are supported by a preponderance of the evidence." Raine v. … Rye v. Women's Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • All Monmouth Landscaping & Design, Inc. v. Manalapan Township

    23 N.J. Tax 250 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 20, 2006

    of Taxation (“County Board”). … See also Prowitz v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • SCI N.C. FUNERAL SERVS., LLC v. McEWEN ELLINGTON FUNERAL SERVS., INC.

    2013 NCBC 11 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 18, 2013

    at 305 (citing Brown Chem. Co. v. … Goldston v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Indiana Waste Systems of Indiana, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

    644 N.E.2d 960 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 19, 1994

    Waste Management hauls garbage generated in Indianapolis under a contract (the Contract) with the Indianapolis Board of Public Works (the Board). … See National Serv-All, Inc. v. Indiana Dep't of State Revenue (1994), Ind.Tax, 644 N.E.2d 954 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Borough of Edgewater

    23 N.J. Misc. 199 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 5, 1945

    In the ease of Lehigh and Wilkes-Barre Coal Co. v. Junction, 75 N. J. L. 922, 927; 68 All. … And in the case of State, Lehigh and Wilkesbarre Coal Co., Pros., v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kassmieh, Michael v. NEIS, Inc.

    2019 TN WC App. 35 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 9, 2019

    See Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. … Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McClain, Jackie v. Golden Services, Inc.

    2025 TN WC App. 27 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 31, 2025

    Doe v. Sundquist, 2 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tenn. 1999). … See, e.g., White v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Town of Peru v. State

    59 Misc. 2d 49 · New York Court of Claims · Feb 7, 1969

    J., in Bailey v. … Simpson v. Wells, 181 N. Y. 252, 257 ; Kauffman & Sons Saddlery Co. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Town of Peru v. State, 35 A.D.2d 875 (1970)Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.