Case law

McCorkhill, Aaron v. Landon Electric Co., Inc.

2023 TN WC App. 33 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 26, 2023

Sharp v. Northwestern Nat’l. Ins. Co., 654 S.W.2d 391, 392 (Tenn. 1983). … Carter v. Hodges, 132 S.W.2d 211, 214 (Tenn. 1939) (internal citations omitted) (citing Tennessee Chem. Co. v. Smith, 238 S.W. 97, 99 (Tenn. 1921)).

Gibbs, Doris v. Express Services, Inc., aka Express Employment Professionals

2021 TN WC 227 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 14, 2021

See Adiole v. Logan Senior Care, LLC, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Parrish, Robert v. Digit Dirt Work, Inc.

2016 TN WC App. 25 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 15, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Robert Parrish ) Docket No. 2015-07-0467 ) v. … WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Robert Parrish ) Docket No. 2015-07-0467 ) v.

BURDESHAW, CHARLES v. SCOTT MANAGEMENT, LLC

2023 TN WC 83 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 21, 2023

Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2023); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). … See the Rules governing the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board on the Bureau’s website If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will become final by operation of law thirty

Pulley v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 16, 2005

Bolkir v. N.C. State University, 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2. N.C. Gen. … Stat. § 143-291 ; Frazier v. Murray, 135 N.C.

VA ZQUEZ ROJAS, MARTIN v. MARTIN CANTU MODESTO

2025 TN WC 23 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 29, 2025

COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT KNOXVILLE MARTIN VAZQUEZ ROJAS, ) Docket No. 2024-30-6935 ) v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Opinion No. 71-195 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 26, 1971

This principle is supported by the following cases: Franklin, et al. v. Morgay Oil Corp., et al., 194 Okl. 519 , 153 P.2d 486 ; Heffelflinger, et al., v. Scott, et al., 47 P.2d 66 (Kan. 1935). … In Town of Fort Cobb v.

Bellmon v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield

98 Misc. 2d 445 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Feb 23, 1979

Y., 68 NY 23, 27 ; see, also, Pauk v Board of Higher Educ., 62 AD2d 660, 664 ; Miller v City of New York, 39 Misc 2d 424 , mod on other grounds 20 AD2d 720 , affd 15 NY2d 34 .) … (Clifford v Corrigan, 117 NY 257, 263 .)

Opinion No. (2008)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 3, 2008

Allen v. … No. 7. v.

Parham v. N.C. Department of Human Resources

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 4, 1996

Farmers Reliance Insurance v. City of Trenton

18 N.J. Misc. 569 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 10, 1940

Cumberland Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. City of Bridgeton (State Board), filed October 9th, 1939. … The judgment of the Mercer County Board in affirming the assessment, is sustained.

Frausto, Alejandra v. Marketing & Sales Mgmt., Corp.

2021 TN WC 173 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 14, 2021

See Baker v. Electrolux, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 65, at *7-10 (Oct. 20, 2017). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

In re the Estate of Hitchins

4 Mills Surr. 290 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1904

Smith v. Edwards, 88 N. Y. 92 . It is important to understand the reason for this rule and we find it very clearly stated in Dougherty v. Thompson, 167 N. … Y. 391 ; Goebel v. Wolf, 113 id. 405 .

State ex rel City of Happy Valley v. Dept. of Rev.

23 Or. Tax 193 · Oregon Tax Court · Sep 18, 2018

See City of Damascus v. Brown, 266 Or App 416, 437-39, 337 P3d 1019 (2014). The court held that the department “plays no role in ‘approving’ the withdrawal itself.” … See Domogalla et al v.

Ferrari-Bullock, Jennifer v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

2020 TN WC 30 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 28, 2020

Bazner v. Am. States Ins. Co., 820 S.W.2d 742, 745 (Tenn. 1991). Therefore, the Court further concludes Ms. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Opinion No. 68-140 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1968

Article V , Section 36 Oklahoma Constitution provides: "The authority of the Legislature shall extend to all rightful subjects of legislation, and any specific grant of authority in this Constitution, upon any subject whatsoever … Read v.

In re the Accounting of Public Administrator of Kings County

25 Misc. 3d 236 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 10, 2009

supervise the fees attorneys charge for legal services even though same are agreed upon or are unchallenged by the parties to the proceeding and notwithstanding the existence of a retainer agreement (see Matter of Stortecky v … (Guideline of Administrative Board for Offices of Public Administrators Pursuant to Sur *241 rogate’s Court Procedure Act Section 1128 [approved by Board Mar. 20, 2006].)

Ketterman v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2010 Ohio 3794 · Ohio Court of Claims · Apr 9, 2010

Radford v. … . {¶ 10} The court of claims does not have jurisdiction over decisions of the Rules Infraction Board. Chatman v. Dept. of Rehabilitation and Correction (1985), 84-06323- AD; Ryan v.

City of Hoboken v. East German Annual Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church

19 N.J. Misc. 266 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 18, 1941

The property involved herein was ordered exempt from taxation for the year 1939 by the Hudson County Board of Taxation. … A. of Garfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1936), 14 N. J. Mis. R. 831; 186 Atl. Rep. 702 ; City of Trenton v. Trenton Masonic Temple Association (Supreme Court, 1930), 8 N. J. Mis. R. 778; 151 Atl.

Schumann v. Brownwood Mut. Life Ins.

286 S.W. 200 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 23, 1926

Cheattham v. Riddle, 12 Tex. 112 ; Coats v. Elliott, 23 Tex. 613 .” … See Barron v. Railway Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 249 S. W. 825 ; Lilienthal v. Indemnity Exchange (Tex. Com. App.) 239 S. W. 906 ; Turley v. Campbell (Tex. Com. App.) 241 S. W. 682 ; Brown v. City Service Co. (Tex. Com.