Case law

In re the Construction of the Will of Feinson

196 Misc. 590 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 12, 1949

(Clark v. Dodge, 269 N. Y. 410 ; Kassel v. Empire Tinware Co., 178 App. Div. 176 ; Matter of Block, 186 Misc. 945, 949 .) … (Clark v. Dodge, supra, p. 415 .)

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 24, 1956

OPINION — AG — ** COUNTY — LEASE LAND — PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS ** (1)UNDER THE PRINCIPLES OF THE LAW ANNOUNCED IN THE CASE OF " ATLAS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY V. … BOARD OF EDUCATION TULSA, 200 P. 171 " AND THE CASE OF " BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS V.

ABDELSHAHAED, REAZKALLAH v. TAYLOR FRESH FOODS, INC.

2021 TN WC 244 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 29, 2021

Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). To prove a compensable injury, Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

1326 Apartments Corp. v. Barbosa

147 Misc. 2d 264 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 23, 1990

(Fe Bland v Two Trees Mgt. Co., supra, at 563.) … The board continued the tax without modification through the time of the Pierces’ sale. The action of plaintiffs board of directors in extending the flip tax was within its authority.

Pardue, Flora v. Bridgestone Metalpha, Inc.

2024 TN WC 65 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 10, 2024

Hawes v. McLane Co., Inc., 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 30, at *9-10 (Aug. 25, 2021). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

People v. Looe

51 Misc. 2d 835 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Oct 25, 1966

Vernon, Criminal Court, Queens County, Docket No. [1964] 1130/64; People v. Schwarts, People v. Berkowitz and People v. … .) *839 Adequate review of these orders could be had before the Board of Standards and Appeals under subdivision 6 of section 666 of the New York City Charter (see People v. Ludwig, 262 App.

L & Z Realty Co. v. Borough of Ringwood

6 N.J. Tax 450 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 18, 1984

In 1976, under Mesavage’s direction, 61,700 board-feet of timber were sold for $2,280. … Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the Passaic County Board of Taxation.

Opinion No. 75-119 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 19, 1975

See also Olson v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 180 P.2d 622 (1947), Custer County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., Okl., 207 P.2d 774 (1949) and Shell Petroleum Corp. v. … State Board of Equalization, 41 P.2d 106 (1935).

Nutley Township v. Anzalone

16 N.J. Tax 304 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 3, 1996

Co. v. … State v.

Opinion No. 68-174 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 11, 1968

As the Supreme Court of Oklahoma said in Board of County Commissioners v. … It is the opinion of the Attorney General that although the Board of County Commissioners cannot create a trust, the Board is authorized to accept the beneficial interest in a public trust or authority, in the manner provided

Opinion No. 68-125 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 29, 1968

In the case of Baker v. … Newman v. Ardmore Rod Gun Club, 190 Okl. 470 , 125 P.2d 191 . 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Section 99.

Bottoms & Tops International, Inc. v. United Parcel Service

160 Misc. 2d 810 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 6, 1994

(Independence Mills Co. v Burlington, Cedar Rapids & N. Ry. Co., 72 Iowa 535, 539 , 34 NW 320 , 322 [1887], as cited in Brown, op. cit., at 460.) … , op. cit., at 457, citing Gibson v Culver & Brown, 17 Wend 305 [1837].)

Parham v. N.C. Department of Human Resources

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 4, 1996

Turack v. State

173 Misc. 178 · New York Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1940

(Brown v. Shyne, 242 N. Y. 176 ; Cullen v. State, 247 App. Div. 921 ; affd., 277 N. Y. 541 .) Quoting from the decision of Judge Lehman in the case of Brown v. … (Saumby v. City of Rochester, 145 N. Y. 81 ; Ruback v. McCleary, Wallin & Crouse, 220 id. 188 ; Grant v. Pennsylvania & N. Y. Canal & R. R. Co., 133 id. 657; Cornbrooks v. Terminal Barber Shops, Inc., 255 App.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 13, 2005

Co. v. Ottawa County Excise Board, 207 P.2d 275 , 277 (Okla. 1949) and Black v. … The money is "appropriated" by the county commissioners when its estimate of needs is approved by the county excise board. 68 O.S. 2001 , § 3010[ 68-3010 ]; see Summey v.

Canizio v. State

8 Misc. 2d 943 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 18, 1957

(Grant v. State of New York, 192 Misc. 45 ; Matter of Smith v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, 2 A D 2d 67; Melesky v. State of New York, 2 Misc 2d 690 ; Worden v. State of New York, 2 Misc 2d 955.) … (Nastasi v. State of New York, 185 Misc. 91 ; Cawthorne v. State of New York, 199 Misc. 1078 ; Blatnicky v. State of New York, 206 Misc. 787 ; Jones v. State of New York, 206 Misc. 788 .)

Wilshire Selby West, Ltd. v. Ramsey Borough

6 N.J. Tax 60 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 3, 1983

Hudson Terrace Apts. v. Ft. … See Curtiss Wright Corp. v. Wood-Ridge, 4 N.J.Tax 68 , 73 n. 4 *63 (Tax Ct.1982), and Edgewater v.

Giddings v. Harding

267 S.W. 976 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 28, 1925

In this respect this contract differs from that under consideration in the case of Fink v. Brown (Tex. Com. App.) 215 S. … Kelley Island Lime & Transport Co. v. Masterson, 100 Tex. 38 , 93 S. W. 427 ; Cothran v. Marmaduke & Brown, 60 Tex. 370 ; Freeman v. Huttig Sash & Door Co., 105 Tex. 570 , 153 S. W. 122 , Ann. Cas. 1916E, 446.

Hopson, Michael v. Driven Brands Holdings

2022 TN WC 80 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 18, 2022

Hopson “should place [him]self under the care of another physician as soon as possible.” 6  The Appeals Board wrote in Limberakis v. … The Appeals Board explained that this provision means that “in circumstances where an employee is noncompliant with medical treatment, compensation shall be held in abeyance, not terminated.” Newell v.

Taylor, Debbie v, The Kroger Co.

2023 TN WC 1 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 18, 2023

Assaf, a board- certified neurologist for her headaches.” The “yes/no” blanks are distorted on Kroger’s filing, but Dr. … See Petty v. Convention Prod. Rigging, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.