Case law

Opinion No. 75-185 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 12, 1975

Firemen's Relief and Pension Board v. Ozment, 467 P.2d 502 (1970). Obviously a retirant could not, however contemporaneously draw both a service pension and a retirement pension. … In addition, the Board of Trustees may require other evidence of disability before ordering retirement and payment of a disability pension.

Rockstone Group v. Lakewood Township

18 N.J. Tax 117 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 24, 1999

Cumberland Arms v. Burlington Tp., 10 N.J.Tax 255, 266 (Tax 1988). … Union Minerals and Alloys Corp. v. Kearny, 11 N.J.Tax 280, 283 (Tax 1990) (citing Hudson Terrace Apartments v.

Opinion No. (1991)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 24, 1991

The term office was interpreted in Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Company, 62 P.2d 94 (Okla. 1936). … , cannot be interpreted to make any position created by the Board of OIFA an "office" for the purposes of Oklahoma's dual-office holding prohibition.

Schumann v. Brownwood Mut. Life Ins.

286 S.W. 200 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 23, 1926

Cheattham v. Riddle, 12 Tex. 112 ; Coats v. Elliott, 23 Tex. 613 .” … See Barron v. Railway Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 249 S. W. 825 ; Lilienthal v. Indemnity Exchange (Tex. Com. App.) 239 S. W. 906 ; Turley v. Campbell (Tex. Com. App.) 241 S. W. 682 ; Brown v. City Service Co. (Tex. Com.

Patton, Ashley v. General Motors

2017 TN WC App. 3 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 17, 2017

See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct. … Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010).

In re the Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.

201 Misc. 1008 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 27, 1952

(Denver v. New York Trust Co., 229 U. S. 123, 142 ; Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U. S. 138, 144 ; Miller v. Wilson, 236 U. S. 373 ; Silver v. Silver, 280 U. S. 117 ; Metropolitan Co. v. Brownell, 294 U. … Objection 18, that the permission of the banking board to the trustee to establish the fund, and the authorization of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and of the banking board authorizing investments in

Opinion No. 68-129 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 29, 1968

Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., Okl., 305 P.2d 298 . In that case the county incurred an indebtedness on March 23, 1955 of $300,000 for road and bridge bonds. … You will note that this fund is distinguishable from that discussed in Okmulgee County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, supra.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 4, 2003

governing board." 20 O.S. … Id. ¶ 3 In Court Fund of Tulsa County v.

Powell, Dexter v. United Parcel Service

2023 TN WC App. 54 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 30, 2023

Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). … Yarbrough v. Protective Servs. Co., Inc., No. 2015-08-0574, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 3, at *11 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Jan. 25, 2016); see also Burnette v. WestRock, No. 2016-01-0670, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp.

Thrower v. Brownlee

12 S.W.2d 184 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 9, 1929

Eor this conclusion the court cites Kennedy v. Bender, 104 Tex. 149 , 135 S. W. 524 ; Wolff v. Cohen (Tex. Civ. App.) 281 S. W. 646 ; Texas Harvester Co. v. Wilson Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 210 S. W. 574 , and Gardner v. … See Loper v. Robinson, 54 Tex. 514 ; Wortman v. Young (Tex. Com. App.) 235 S. W. 559 ; Dow-lin v. Boyd (Tex. Com. App.) 291 S. W. 1095 ; Dibrell v. Bank (Tex. Giv. App.) 293 S. W. 874 ; Dossett v. Franklin, etc,, Co.

Life With Joy, Inc. v. Township of Green/Township of Green v. Life With Joy, Inc.

New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 25, 2022

[N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6] While value determinations by County Boards generally enjoy a presumption of validity, MSGW Real Estate Fund, LLC v. Borough of Mountain Lakes, 18 N.J. … “Without timely filing of review petitions a county tax board . . . is without jurisdiction to grant the review sought.” Danis v. Middlesex Cty. Bd. of Taxation, 113 N.J. Super. 6, 10 (App. Div. 1971)).

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 19, 1985

The basic principle concerning the power of an administrative board to adopt rules and regulations was expressed by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in W.S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co. v. Ferguson Inv. … See, Adams v. Professional Practices Comm ., 524 P.2d 932 (Okla. 1974). Similarly, rules must be promulgated in aid of and not in the derogation of legislative purposes.

Hibbitts, Greg v. Kim Royal dba Royal Guttering

2021 TN WC 135 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 4, 2021

.: 2020-020384 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 48762-2020 KIM ROYAL DBA ) ROYAL GUTTERING ) Judge: Brian Kk. … Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2019); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 23, 1999

Clifton v. Clifton, 801 P.2d 693 , 696 (Okla. 1990). … Clifton v. Clifton, 801 P.2d 693 (Okla. 1990).

Fiveash v. Willis

1 S.W.2d 585 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 18, 1928

Willis (Hardy v. Beaty, 84 Tex. 568 , 19 S. W. 778 , 31 Am. St. Rep. 80 ; Titus v. Johnson, 50 Tex. 238 ; Moody v. Holcomb, 26 Tex. 719 ; Rains v. Wheeler, 76 Tex. 392 , 13 S. … W. 324 ), and his claim under the instrument of date October 19, 1892, became res judicata (Nichols v. Dibrell, 61 Tex. 541 ; Beaumont Irrigating Co. v. Delaune, 107 Tex. 384 , 180 S. W 08; Hanrick v.

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. City of Perth Amboy

9 N.J. Tax 571 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 24, 1988

While defendant argues, citing Gehin-Scott v. … Props, v.

CLAYBROOKS, SONDRA L. v. INSIGHT GLOBAL, LLC

2023 TN WC 82 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 14, 2023

On May 30, the Appeals Board affirmed and determined the appeal was frivolous. The Board issued the decision after the scheduled dates for Insight’s summary judgment and compensation hearings. Ms. … Claybrooks v. Insight Global, LLC, 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *11 (May 30, 2023) (citing Sadeekah v. Zaher Abdelaziz d/b/a Home Furniture and More, 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Gray, Tiffany v. Sedgwick Claims Management, Inc.

2024 TN WC App. 15 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 9, 2024

King v. Big Binder Express, LLC, No. 2016-07-0378, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 92, at *10 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Dec. 7, 2016) (citing Overstreet v. TRW Commer. … Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

M.D. v. State of New York

2025 NY Slip Op 25225 · New York Court of Claims · Sep 16, 2025

Bell v Board of Educ. of City of NY ( 90 NY2d 944 [1997]), Doe v Fulton School Dist . ( 35 AD3d 1194 [4th Dept 2006]), Coon v Board of Educ. of City of NY ( 160 AD2d 403 [1st Dept 1990]); and Gonzalez v Mackler ( 19 AD2d … Board of Educ . of the City of NY, 160 AD2d 403, 403 [1st Dept 1990].)

Schetty v. City of Jersey City

18 N.J. Misc. 37 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 9, 1940

See The Colonial Life Insurance Company of America v. City of Jersey City (State Board), opinion filed simultaneously herewith. The case of Koch v. City of Jersey City (Supreme Court, 1937), 118 N. J. L. 85; 191 Atl. … See Gibbs v. State Board (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1925), 101 N. J. L. 371; 129 Atl. Rep. 189 ; City of Hoboken v. Hoboken Land and Improvement Co. (State Board), filed June 7th, 1938.