Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.12s
Clark-Pleasant Community School Corp. v. Department of Local Government Finance
899 N.E.2d 762 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 15, 2009
The DLGF referred the petition to the School Property Tax Control Board (Control Board) for its recommendation. On November 15, 2007, the Control Board conducted a hearing on the matter. … See, e.g., Graber v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 727 N.E.2d 802, 806 (Ind. Tax.Ct.2000), review denied; Boaz v. Bartholomew Consol. Sch. Corp., 654 N.E.2d 320, 325-26 (Ind. Tax Ct.1995); Bell v.
Cited 8 timesPublished201 Misc. 383 · New York Court of Claims · Apr 9, 1952
Tax Law, § 280 [prior to 1946]; Marasco v. State of New York, 182 Misc. 505 , and Reiser v. State of New York, 198 Misc. 647 ). … Bankers Trust Co. v. Graves, 270 N. Y. 316 ), and not from the date of the modifying order of July 25, 1951 (Matter of Stannard [Wells] v. Browne, Sup. Ct., Albany Co., 1946, 2 C. C. H. State Tax Reporter, § 89-510.20).
Cited 2 timesPublishedState, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco v. Club 99, Inc.
7 Fla. Supp. 2d 176 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Oct 8, 1984
Anderson and Brown engaged in a conversation while standing approximately three feet from Investigator Oliva. Anderson asked Brown if Brown could obtain a half gram of cocaine. … Nadjawski v. State, 371 So.2d 554 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); State v. Hubbard, 328 So.2d 465 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); State v. Dent, 322 So.2d 543 (Fla. 1975). Section 777.011, Florida Statutes. 6.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRoberts v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
2009 Ohio 7015 · Ohio Court of Claims · Nov 3, 2009
[Cite as Roberts v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2009-Ohio-7015.] … Brown Walter W. Messenger, Jr. Daniel R. Forsythe 1625 Bethel Road, Suite 102 Eric A.
Cited 0 timesPublished2018 Ohio 1717 · Ohio Court of Claims · Apr 17, 2018
McGrath v. … member Andrej Lah during a board meeting.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1969
credit of the State General Revenue Fund shall be subject to appropriation by the Legislature. " (Emphasis added) Your attention is directed also to the following language in the body of the opinion in the case of Draper v. … State Board of Equalization, Okl., 414 P.2d '76 (1966), ". . . Section 23 was adopted in 1941.
Cited 0 timesPublished183 Misc. 66 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 27, 1944
That exclusion was based upon the rule in Rosseau v. Rouss ( 180 N. Y. 116 ), which *72 appears to have been approved in Croker v. New York Trust Co. ( 245 N. Y. 17 ) and Matter of Browning ( 280 N. … The Court of Appeals appears to have definitely enforced that rule in Matter of Browning (supra).
Cited 2 timesPublishedIn re the Accounting of Addison
21 Misc. 2d 29 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 13, 1960
Y. 516 ; Matter of Browning, 165 Misc. 819 , affd. 254 App. Div. 843 , affd. 281 N. Y. 577 ; Matter of Harmon, 80 N. Y. S. 2d 903.) … The court agrees with the conclusion of the petitioner that any construction of other matters arising under paragraph Twentieth should be postponed at this time (Schettler v. Smith, 41 N.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWebb, Rick v. Waupaca Foundry, Inc.
2021 TN WC 165 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 23, 2021
Code Ann. § 20-16-101; see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Waupaca satisfies this burden, Mr. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCantrell v. Upper Pittsgrove Township
1 N.J. Tax 508 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 25, 1980
Rek Investment Co. v. Newark, 80 N.J.Super. 552 (App.Div.1963). … Siegal v. Newark, 38 N.J. 57 , 183 A.2d 21 (1962).
Cited 5 timesPublishedPatton, Ashley v. General Motors
2017 TN WC App. 3 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 17, 2017
See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct. … Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcClain Museum, Inc. v. Madison County Assessor
Indiana Tax Court · Nov 7, 2019
STANDARD OF REVIEW The party challenging an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. See Johnson Cty. Prop. Tax Assessment Bd. of Appeals v. … Assessor v. Duke, 69 N.E.3d 567, 570 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2017) (citing both I.C. § 6-1.1-10-36(a) and State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 1978
been designated as the purchasing officer by the governing board. … Dairy v. Allen, 188 Okl. 287 , 108 P.2d 164 (1940), as repealing all prior general laws, or parts thereof, which are repugnant to, and inconsistent and irreconcilable with the repealing statute.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRichards, Edward v. Kiewit Power Constructors Company
2016 TN WC App. 69 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 9, 2016
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Edward Richards ) Docket No. 2016-01-0212 ) v. … Davidson, III, delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Judge David F. Hensley and Judge Timothy W. Conner joined.
Cited 0 timesPublished2025 TN WC App. 20 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 20, 2025
Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Batey v. Deliver This, Inc., 568 S.W.3d 91, 95-96 (Tenn. 2019).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew Jersey Ass'n of School Business Officials, Inc. v. Hamilton Township
22 N.J. Tax 467 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 8, 2005
Defendant points to Secondary School Admissions Test Board, Inc. v. Princeton Borough, supra, 13 N.J. … Defendant has additionally cited Gwinnett County Board of Tax Assessors v. Georgia School Board Ass’n, 211 Ga.App. 437 , 439 S.E.2d 666 (1993).
Cited 2 timesPublishedAtlantic City v. Atlantic Deauville, Inc.
5 N.J. Tax 459 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 27, 1983
Nor is there any authority for plaintiff’s allegation that council can only ratify the actions of a board member. One of the issues involved in Edgewater Pk. Tp. v. Edgewater Pk. … Both Morton v. Clark Tp., supra, and Kramer v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 29, 1968
Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., Okl., 305 P.2d 298 . In that case the county incurred an indebtedness on March 23, 1955 of $300,000 for road and bridge bonds. … You will note that this fund is distinguishable from that discussed in Okmulgee County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMuenich v. North Township Assessor
801 N.E.2d 783 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 23, 2003
State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs v. Town of St. John et. al, 702 N.E.2d 1034, 1043 (Ind.1998). … See Blackbird Farms v. Dep't of Local Govt Fin., 765 N.E.2d 711, 714 (Ind.Tax Ct.2002); Park Steckley I v. Dep't of Local Gov't Fin., 779 N.E.2d 1270, 1273 (Ind.Tax Ct.2002).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1971
In the case of Phillips v. H. A. … See also: Gray v. Gray, Okl., 459 P.2d 181 . Further, in the case of State of Oklahoma v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna