Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

2.01s

  • Chadwick 99 Associates v. Director, Division of Taxation

    23 N.J. Tax 390 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 10, 2007

    Corp. v. … Plaintiffs rely on Baldwin Construction Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 16 N.J. 329 , 108 A.2d 598 (1954), and West Milford Tp. v. Van Decker, supra, 120 N.J. 354 , 576 A.2d 881 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1979

    The State Employees Group Health and Life Insurance Board may also extend dependent life insurance in an amount to be determined by the Board to each insured employee who elects to insure his eligible dependents. … Janes v. Janes, Okla. 21 P.2d 500 (1933); Whitney v. Whitney, 134 P.2d 357 (1943); Blunt v. Blunt, 176 P.2d 471 (1947).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Diaz

    85 Misc. 2d 41 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Dec 4, 1975

    (See, also, Brown v State, 3 Md App 90; Kroehler v Scott, 391 F Supp 1114 . … (People v Brown, 24 NY2d 421 ; People v Corrado, 22 NY2d 308 ; Agnello v United States, 269 US 20 ; Jones v United States, 357 US 493 ; see, also, People v Oden, 36 NY2d 382 ; People v Brown, 32 NY2d 172 .) , Consequently

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1995)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 1995

    Jackson v. … Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma County, 618 P.2d 915 , 919 (Okla. 1980). See also Independent School District No. 1 v. Board of County Commissioners, 674 P.2d 547 (Okla. 1983) and City of Tulsa v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Curtis v. Indiana Bd. of Tax Review

    891 N.E.2d 193 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 24, 2007

    891 N.E.2d 193 (2007) CURTIS v. INDIANA BD. OF TAX REVIEW. No. 71T10-0704-SC-21 Tax Court of Indiana. September 24, 2007. Disposition of case by unpublished memorandum decision. … Each of the Indiana Board's motions to dismiss is denied. The Indiana Board's motions to strike are denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harris, Shunekari v. American International Group, Inc., d/b/a American Home Assurance

    2024 TN WC 20 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 13, 2024

    As seen in the Appeals Board’s opinion in Hawes v. McLane Company, Inc., 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … As determined by the Appeals Board in Garcia Carrillo v. Hurtado, 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moss, Laundell v. Nationwide Surplus, LLC

    2022 TN WC 48 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 20, 2022

    Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2021); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Nationwide is successful in meeting this burden, Mr. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-196 (1973) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 26, 1973

    Under the rule of statutory construction announced in McVicker v. … Also, in Bridal v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clark-Pleasant Community School Corp. v. Department of Local Government Finance

    899 N.E.2d 762 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 15, 2009

    The DLGF referred the petition to the School Property Tax Control Board (Control Board) for its recommendation. On November 15, 2007, the Control Board conducted a hearing on the matter. … See, e.g., Graber v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 727 N.E.2d 802, 806 (Ind. Tax.Ct.2000), review denied; Boaz v. Bartholomew Consol. Sch. Corp., 654 N.E.2d 320, 325-26 (Ind. Tax Ct.1995); Bell v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Milevoi v. Alamilla

    107 Misc. 2d 493 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 12, 1981

    Respondent, in support of his position,<■ cites a number of cases, among them, Maguire v Ardea Realty Corp. ( 279 App Div 904 ) and Romag Realty Corp. v Saunders ( 77 Misc 2d 11 ). … In Spezio v Sutphin — Flushing Realty Corp. ( 181 NYS2d 933, 935 ), the court held that: “It is apparent that plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • 1326 Apartments Corp. v. Barbosa

    147 Misc. 2d 264 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 23, 1990

    (Fe Bland v Two Trees Mgt. Co., supra, at 563.) … The board continued the tax without modification through the time of the Pierces’ sale. The action of plaintiffs board of directors in extending the flip tax was within its authority.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Maurer v. Slickedit, Inc.

    2005 NCBC 4 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 12, 2005

    Maurer v. … Fletcher v. Fletcher, 123 N.C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 69-244 (1969) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 26, 1969

    Polk v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Okl., 420 P.2d 520 (1966) and Taff v. State, Okl., 425 P.2d 970 (1966). … Those statutes do not authorize the incorporation of such associations or "fair boards". The eleventh paragraph of the syllabus of Shaw v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Canizio v. State

    8 Misc. 2d 943 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 18, 1957

    (Grant v. State of New York, 192 Misc. 45 ; Matter of Smith v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, 2 A D 2d 67; Melesky v. State of New York, 2 Misc 2d 690 ; Worden v. State of New York, 2 Misc 2d 955.) … (Nastasi v. State of New York, 185 Misc. 91 ; Cawthorne v. State of New York, 199 Misc. 1078 ; Blatnicky v. State of New York, 206 Misc. 787 ; Jones v. State of New York, 206 Misc. 788 .)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • People v. Frias-Acevedo

    27 Misc. 3d 889 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Mar 26, 2010

    , J., docket No. 2006NY085745) and People v Brown ( 15 Misc 3d 1143[A] , 2007 NY Slip Op 51129[U] [Crim Ct, NY County 2007]). … People v Brown, supra.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-303 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1976

    As to other entities under 74 O.S. 902 [ 74-902 ](14) who are or may become eligible employers no formal agreement to contribute is required as stated in Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System v. … The action available to the Board of Trustees however may depend upon the status of the employee at the time it becomes known to the Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edgeboro Disposal, Inc. v. Division of Taxation

    11 N.J. Tax 463 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 22, 1991

    See Bernards Tp. v. Taxation Div. Director, 7 N.J. … See Robson v. Rodriquez, 26 N.J. 517, 523 , 141 A.2d 1 (1958); see also Wilson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Ross

    115 Misc. 41 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1921

    This is not compelling the contestants to furnish their evidence as in the case of Smidt v. Bailey, 132 App. … J., April 29, 1916; Matter of Cramer, Id., Nov. 14, 1916; Matter of Brown, Id., Dec. 20, 1919; Matter of Emmons, Id., Jan. 8, 1920.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Bassham, Stephen v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.

    2023 TN WC 7 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 17, 2023

    Petty v. Convention Prod. Rigging, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 95, at *21 (Dec. 29, 2016). In this case, none of the physicians recommended surgery. Dr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-197 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 1972

    ** Summary ** SOURCES FOR SALARY OF COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Pursuant to 70 O.S. 4 -103 [ 70-4-103 ] (1971), the State Board of Education is to pay to a county superintendent an amount equal to the difference between … The Supreme Court in construing this provision of the Constitution, enunciated the rule in Tulsa v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.