Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.43s

  • Reigert v. State of Ohio Med. Bd.

    2023 Ohio 1489 · Ohio Court of Claims · Apr 19, 2023

    See Cross v. … Master v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schillinger & Albert, Inc. v. Myral Hats, Inc.

    55 Misc. 2d 178 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Nov 22, 1967

    Where the board refuses its sanction, a suit initiated by the president against his coequal director cannot be maintained (Sterling Inds. v. Ball Bearing Pen Corp., 298 N. … If the controversy is obvious, a formal request for approval of suit by the board of a closely held corporation may be deemed a vain gesture (Ripley v. International Rys., 8 A D 2d 62; Syracuse Tel. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cassini v. City of Orange

    16 N.J. Tax 438 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 8, 1997

    Great Adventure, Inc. v. … Corp. v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Collier v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

    2010 Ohio 5683 · Ohio Court of Claims · Oct 12, 2010

    [Cite as Collier v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2010-Ohio-5683.] … Brown Andre Collier, #233-115 Emily M. Simmons London Correctional Institution James P. Dinsmore P.O. Box 69 Jennifer A.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1979

    The State Employees Group Health and Life Insurance Board may also extend dependent life insurance in an amount to be determined by the Board to each insured employee who elects to insure his eligible dependents. … Janes v. Janes, Okla. 21 P.2d 500 (1933); Whitney v. Whitney, 134 P.2d 357 (1943); Blunt v. Blunt, 176 P.2d 471 (1947).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1995)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 1995

    Jackson v. … Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma County, 618 P.2d 915 , 919 (Okla. 1980). See also Independent School District No. 1 v. Board of County Commissioners, 674 P.2d 547 (Okla. 1983) and City of Tulsa v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Curtis v. Indiana Bd. of Tax Review

    891 N.E.2d 193 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 24, 2007

    891 N.E.2d 193 (2007) CURTIS v. INDIANA BD. OF TAX REVIEW. No. 71T10-0704-SC-21 Tax Court of Indiana. September 24, 2007. Disposition of case by unpublished memorandum decision. … Each of the Indiana Board's motions to dismiss is denied. The Indiana Board's motions to strike are denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harris, Shunekari v. American International Group, Inc., d/b/a American Home Assurance

    2024 TN WC 20 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 13, 2024

    As seen in the Appeals Board’s opinion in Hawes v. McLane Company, Inc., 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … As determined by the Appeals Board in Garcia Carrillo v. Hurtado, 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moss, Laundell v. Nationwide Surplus, LLC

    2022 TN WC 48 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 20, 2022

    Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2021); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Nationwide is successful in meeting this burden, Mr. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Abdelshahaed, Reazkallah v. Taylor Farms

    2021 TN WC App. 58 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 27, 2021

    Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). … See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clark-Pleasant Community School Corp. v. Department of Local Government Finance

    899 N.E.2d 762 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 15, 2009

    The DLGF referred the petition to the School Property Tax Control Board (Control Board) for its recommendation. On November 15, 2007, the Control Board conducted a hearing on the matter. … See, e.g., Graber v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 727 N.E.2d 802, 806 (Ind. Tax.Ct.2000), review denied; Boaz v. Bartholomew Consol. Sch. Corp., 654 N.E.2d 320, 325-26 (Ind. Tax Ct.1995); Bell v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • City of East Orange v. Lismarc Realty Management Corp.

    7 N.J. Tax 469 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 16, 1985

    Melone v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co., 18 N.J. 163 , 113 A.2d 13 (1955). … Evesham Tp. v. Nye, 3 N.J.Tax 183, 187 (Tax Ct.1981).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-315 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1976

    In the case of Riley v. … In the case of O'Neal v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chadwick 99 Associates v. Director, Division of Taxation

    23 N.J. Tax 390 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 10, 2007

    Corp. v. … Plaintiffs rely on Baldwin Construction Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 16 N.J. 329 , 108 A.2d 598 (1954), and West Milford Tp. v. Van Decker, supra, 120 N.J. 354 , 576 A.2d 881 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Milevoi v. Alamilla

    107 Misc. 2d 493 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 12, 1981

    Respondent, in support of his position,<■ cites a number of cases, among them, Maguire v Ardea Realty Corp. ( 279 App Div 904 ) and Romag Realty Corp. v Saunders ( 77 Misc 2d 11 ). … In Spezio v Sutphin — Flushing Realty Corp. ( 181 NYS2d 933, 935 ), the court held that: “It is apparent that plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Diaz

    85 Misc. 2d 41 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Dec 4, 1975

    (See, also, Brown v State, 3 Md App 90; Kroehler v Scott, 391 F Supp 1114 . … (People v Brown, 24 NY2d 421 ; People v Corrado, 22 NY2d 308 ; Agnello v United States, 269 US 20 ; Jones v United States, 357 US 493 ; see, also, People v Oden, 36 NY2d 382 ; People v Brown, 32 NY2d 172 .) , Consequently

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • People v. Pacheco

    74 Misc. 2d 113 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Apr 27, 1973

    (People v. Brown, supra, p. 424.) The observed activity in the instant case was similiar in most respects to that of the Brown case. … (People v. Brown, supra, p. 423.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 69-244 (1969) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 26, 1969

    Polk v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Okl., 420 P.2d 520 (1966) and Taff v. State, Okl., 425 P.2d 970 (1966). … Those statutes do not authorize the incorporation of such associations or "fair boards". The eleventh paragraph of the syllabus of Shaw v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-196 (1973) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 26, 1973

    Under the rule of statutory construction announced in McVicker v. … Also, in Bridal v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bassham, Stephen v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.

    2023 TN WC 7 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 17, 2023

    Petty v. Convention Prod. Rigging, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 95, at *21 (Dec. 29, 2016). In this case, none of the physicians recommended surgery. Dr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.