Case law

Wright, Keith v. Cummins Engine Company, Inc.

2019 TN WC 66 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 24, 2019

Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *18 (Nov. 9, 2015); see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(c)(6) (2018). … To appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

In re the Estate of Campanelli

15 Misc. 2d 663 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 28, 1958

as to her aAvard, and the court reserved decision on the issue raised by petitioner’s ansAver pending the board’s action. … (Matter of Voelker v. Rosenberg's Sons, 275 N. Y. 565 ; Matter of Szuba v. Laub's Sons, supra; Matter of Marconi v. Marshall, 284 App. Div. 728 , motion for leave to appeal denied 308 N. Y. 1050 ; Matter of Kennedy v.

Sanders, Brandy v. NORTHSHORE HEIGHTS ASSISTED LIVING

2025 TN WC 42 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 10, 2025

Thomas v. Zipp Express, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *11 n.4 (Mar. 15, 2017). … See Williamson v. Prof. Care Servs., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Opinion No. 76-118 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1976

In the many opinions issued subsequent to the April 8, 1944, opinion and the Supreme Court ruling in State v. … This result was found to be in accordance with the provisions and intent of 51 O.S. 24 [ 51-24 ], and State v. Nix, supra.

In Re Stoltzfus

29 A.3d 151 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 2011

This action is taken pursuant to the authority of the Board under Article V, of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania by which the Board is granted authority to determine whether there is probable cause to … Subsection (b) of section 17 of Article V of the Pennsylvania Constitution has no subsections. The Board is referring here to § 17(b). 2 . Pa. Const., Article V, § 18(d)(1).

Anderson,Bennie v. City of Knoxville Department of Recreation

2026 TN WC App. 1 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 5, 2026

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Bennie Anderson Docket No. 2022-03-0885 v. … Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Resp. of the Sup.

Jos. L. Muscarelle Dev. Co. v. Manalapan Tp.

13 N.J. Tax 330 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 8, 1993

, the failure is not a *335 jurisdictional defect such as to invalidate the board’s judgment. … In Lecross Assocs. v.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 24, 1992

See, e.g., Andrews v. Independent School District No. 29, 737 P.2d 929 , 931 (Okla. 1987); International Association of Firefighters Local v. … by appointment by the board of county commissioners.

Ford v. Jurgens

2021 NCBC 64 · North Carolina Business Court · Oct 5, 2021

Ford v. Jurgens, 2021 NCBC 64. … Co. v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1971

O.S. 1970 Supp., 3208 [ 70-3208 ], THE OKLAHOMA REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION HAVE THE POWER TO DETERMINE AND/OR CHANGE THE FUNCTIONS OF AN INSTITUTION IN THE OKLAHOMA SYSTEM FOR HIGHER EDUCATION; (2) PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V, … AN INSTITUTION WITHIN THE OKLAHOMA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION; (4) FURTHER, THE LEGISLATURE HAS THE POWER TO REMOVE AN INSTITUTION FROM ONE GOVERNING BOARD AND TO PLACE SAID INSTITUTION UNDER ANOTHER BOARD NEWLY ESTABLISHED

Opinion No. 76-128 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 1976

to hold positions created under such Boards or Commissions by this Act, and the said persons so appointed shall hold office at the will of such officer, Boards or Commissions making said appointment, provided that any Board … The United States Supreme Court in Sugarman v.

Opinion No. 68-326 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1968

This language is mandatory and indicates that the board of education of each school district in the state must adopt a plan providing for sick leave benefits for teachers. In the case of State ex rel. Ogden v. … A substitute teacher shall be paid in an amount and under such terms as may be agreed upon in advance by the substitute teacher, the regular teacher and the board of education or according to — — regulations of the board.

Opinion No. 73-287 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 22, 1974

Smith v. Colson, 31 Okl. 703 , 123 P. 149 (1912), Ritchie v. Raines, Okl. Cr., 374 P.2d 772 (1962). "Expenditure" is normally defined as an actual disbursement or spending of money. Crow v. … Board of Sup'rs. of County of Stanislaus, 135 Cal.App. 451 , 27 P.2d 655 (1933). Merely allowing a booth in the Student Union would not be an "expenditure of public funds" as contemplated by Section 501.

Avadim Health, Inc. v. Daybreak Cap. Partners, LLC

2021 NCBC 73 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 30, 2021

Brown, Jr., and Stanley Yorsz, for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Avadim Health, Inc. and Counterclaim Defendant Stephen Woody. … At all relevant times Woody was Avadim’s Chief Executive Officer and served on Avadim’s Board of Directors. (Countercls. ¶ 2.) 4.

State v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.

62 S.W.2d 81 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 24, 1933

Ry. v. Shannon, 100 Tex. 379 , 100 S. W. 133 , 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 081; Lively v. Ry., 102 Tex. 545 , 120 S. W. 852 . … The standard by which such apportionment is to be made by the board is prescribed in the act.

Salt & Light Co. v. Mount Holly Township

15 N.J. Tax 274 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 8, 1995

Franklin v. … See Yorgason v.

Sullivan, Leah v. Petree Arbor Lawn & Landscape, Inc.

2024 TN WC App. 44 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 13, 2024

Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Judge Pele I. Godkin and Judge Meredith B. Weaver joined. Tiffany B. … See, e.g., Matlock v. Ltv Steel, Inc., No. W2001-02512-SC-WCM- CV, 2002 Tenn. LEXIS 559 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp.

Opinion No. 69-150 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 27, 1969

to employ or appoint attorneys to advise or represent said Officer, Board or Commission, in any matter, and all the legal duties of such Officer, Board or Commission shall devolve upon and are hereby vested in the Attorney … In Darling Apartment Co. v. Springer, 25 Del.

Konig v. McCoy

63 Misc. 2d 1038 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Aug 18, 1970

(Fuerst v. Incorporated Vil. of Bayville, 40 Misc 2d 909 .) Plaintiff’s testator served the City of New York well and true for over 28 years. As part of his employment he was entitled to vacation and holiday time. … Board of Educ., 54 Misc 2d 206, 209 .)

Otelsberg v. Bloomfield Township

18 N.J. Tax 243 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 25, 1999

Taxpayer received his 1997 notice of assessment for $162,300, and appealed same to the Essex County Board of Taxation (“County Board”). … The Supreme Court in Edwards v.