Case law

Bryant, Joshua v. Malco Theaters, Inc.

2021 TN WC 180 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 27, 2021

Code Ann. § 20-16-101; see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). … Further, the Appeals Board has stated the filing requirements of Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 56 “are not mere suggestions,” but plain and unambiguous requirements. Thomas v. Zipp Express, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App.

Milevoi v. Alamilla

107 Misc. 2d 493 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 12, 1981

Respondent, in support of his position,<■ cites a number of cases, among them, Maguire v Ardea Realty Corp. ( 279 App Div 904 ) and Romag Realty Corp. v Saunders ( 77 Misc 2d 11 ). … In Spezio v Sutphin — Flushing Realty Corp. ( 181 NYS2d 933, 935 ), the court held that: “It is apparent that plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought.

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 6, 1985

If any of said board of county commissioners finds that substantial detriment to the roads and bridges in their respective counties would occur, said board shall determine reasonable measures necessary to upgrade the roads … Cavett v. Geary Board of Education , 587 P.2d 991 , 993 (Okla. 1978).

Sanders, Brandy v. NORTHSHORE HEIGHTS ASSISTED LIVING

2025 TN WC 42 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 10, 2025

Thomas v. Zipp Express, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *11 n.4 (Mar. 15, 2017). … See Williamson v. Prof. Care Servs., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Gray

10 Mills Surr. 398 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1913

Mount v. Tuttle, 183 N. Y. 358 . … Murray v. Miller, 178 N. Y. 316 ; Matter of Durand, 194 N. Y. 477 .

Opinion No. 76-118 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1976

In the many opinions issued subsequent to the April 8, 1944, opinion and the Supreme Court ruling in State v. … This result was found to be in accordance with the provisions and intent of 51 O.S. 24 [ 51-24 ], and State v. Nix, supra.

Petrizzo v. Borough of Edgewater

2 N.J. Tax 197 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 9, 1981

The history of the assessments and County Board action follows: Block 50, Lots 17 & 18 Assessment County Board Land $20,700 $20,700 Improvement 4,000 1,000 $24,700 $21,700 Total Block 50, Lots 19 & 20 Assessment County Board … See Newark v. West Milford, 9 N.J. 295 , 88 A.2d 211 (1953) and Venino v. Carlstadt, 1 N.J.Tax 172 (1980).

Warchol v. Superintendent of Washington Local School Dist.

2022 Ohio 3140 · Ohio Court of Claims · Aug 31, 2022

Morgan v. … Neither Superintendent Anstadt nor the members of the school board receive compensation for that activity.

Cedar Glen Lakes Water Co. v. Taxation Division Director

7 N.J. Tax 233 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 24, 1985

Initially, plaintiff relies upon Parsippany-Troy Hills *240 v. … Velasco v. Goldman Builders, Inc., supra at 134, 225 A.2d 148 .

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 26, 1980

May a school district be penalized in terms of reduced state aid based on average daily attendance if the local school board or administration had cut short a school day or days because said school board or administration … See Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Moss, Okl. 509 P.2d 666 (1973); Eason Oil Co. v. Corporation Comm'n., Okl. 535 P.2d 283 (1975).

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1971

O.S. 1970 Supp., 3208 [ 70-3208 ], THE OKLAHOMA REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION HAVE THE POWER TO DETERMINE AND/OR CHANGE THE FUNCTIONS OF AN INSTITUTION IN THE OKLAHOMA SYSTEM FOR HIGHER EDUCATION; (2) PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V, … AN INSTITUTION WITHIN THE OKLAHOMA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION; (4) FURTHER, THE LEGISLATURE HAS THE POWER TO REMOVE AN INSTITUTION FROM ONE GOVERNING BOARD AND TO PLACE SAID INSTITUTION UNDER ANOTHER BOARD NEWLY ESTABLISHED

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1980

Alfalfa Co. v. … Mitchener v. City Cmr's. of City of Okmulgee, 100 Okl. 98 , 228 P. 159 (1924); Worley v. French, 184 Okl. 116 , 85 P.2d 296 (1938); Board of Education of Okla. City v.

Spencer County Assessor and Grass Township Assessor v. AK Steel Corporation

61 N.E.3d 406 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 5, 2016

from the Indiana Board’s factual findings de novo. … Nickey v.

In re the Estate of Campanelli

15 Misc. 2d 663 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 28, 1958

as to her aAvard, and the court reserved decision on the issue raised by petitioner’s ansAver pending the board’s action. … (Matter of Voelker v. Rosenberg's Sons, 275 N. Y. 565 ; Matter of Szuba v. Laub's Sons, supra; Matter of Marconi v. Marshall, 284 App. Div. 728 , motion for leave to appeal denied 308 N. Y. 1050 ; Matter of Kennedy v.

Throckmorton v. Egg Harbor Township

12 N.J. Tax 419 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 2, 1992

In Cooter & Gell v. … However, Fagas v.

Anderson,Bennie v. City of Knoxville Department of Recreation

2026 TN WC App. 1 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 5, 2026

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Bennie Anderson Docket No. 2022-03-0885 v. … Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Resp. of the Sup.

Collier v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2010 Ohio 5683 · Ohio Court of Claims · Oct 12, 2010

[Cite as Collier v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2010-Ohio-5683.] … Brown Andre Collier, #233-115 Emily M. Simmons London Correctional Institution James P. Dinsmore P.O. Box 69 Jennifer A.

Opinion No. 76-128 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 1976

to hold positions created under such Boards or Commissions by this Act, and the said persons so appointed shall hold office at the will of such officer, Boards or Commissions making said appointment, provided that any Board … The United States Supreme Court in Sugarman v.

Schillinger & Albert, Inc. v. Myral Hats, Inc.

55 Misc. 2d 178 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Nov 22, 1967

Where the board refuses its sanction, a suit initiated by the president against his coequal director cannot be maintained (Sterling Inds. v. Ball Bearing Pen Corp., 298 N. … If the controversy is obvious, a formal request for approval of suit by the board of a closely held corporation may be deemed a vain gesture (Ripley v. International Rys., 8 A D 2d 62; Syracuse Tel. v.

Opinion No. 68-326 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1968

This language is mandatory and indicates that the board of education of each school district in the state must adopt a plan providing for sick leave benefits for teachers. In the case of State ex rel. Ogden v. … A substitute teacher shall be paid in an amount and under such terms as may be agreed upon in advance by the substitute teacher, the regular teacher and the board of education or according to — — regulations of the board.